GUILLE,
I putting all my chips on the workable principle of the cold fusion engines. I am independently working on this with some references to the Tokomaks, which are the most promising fusion engines to date.
GUILLE,
I putting all my chips on the workable principle of the cold fusion engines. I am independently working on this with some references to the Tokomaks, which are the most promising fusion engines to date.
The string theory has much merit,andcould be developed into something remarkable and substantial.It would take just a little more thought,now this
here brane!what is it? and the subatomic strings,or waves,maybe they are just
to keep it simple Thought Waves,They are the Potential thing that will arise if
it is given Focus of Intent,otherwise will remain wavy or string like.Another name
for these here strings,or waves would be maybe something that flows like a river
lets call it for want of a better name,Liquid Consciousness,that flows around and
in this here Membrane,the membrane acts like a conductor that allows the free
flow of potential thought to be ominipresent and instantly available if focussed
upon.this Membrane in which weall live and have our being,fills all there is,I did not mention the word Space,because in reality there is None,this universe is absolutly full to the brim,as I havesaid many times you would be hard pressed to squeeze a banknote between any socalled space.the Membrane or mindful
substance,ather,whatever,it is all the same stuff,fills all to maximum capacity.
kind regards michael.
What I think is that theorists came up with the brane ideas in order to resolve the problem of dimensionality. I am one of those who strongly believed only at most four dimensions for each level of existence (LOE). However, there can be infinite numbers of LOE. Since we are living in one particular LOE, there is no way we can prove the existence of the many others unless we can cross the dimensional plane of our four dimensional spacetime LOE.Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
But if the graviton is a closed loop string .... can't it cross the dimensional plane to carry some kind of information to and fro ??
I don't know a lot about this ... i thought the 'branes' were first discovered as unidentified objects predicted by the equations ... ??What I think is that theorists came up with the brane ideas in order to resolve the problem of dimensionality
Greg
Then we still have to catch one graviton and extract the information out of it. Nobody has done that just yet.Originally Posted by Graybeard
I think Ed Witten came up with the idea of membrane or brane (M-theory) in order to unify the five distinct types of string theories.Originally Posted by Graybeard
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)