[Aireal]

Profpat

I had reference points even for theories I did not agree with in my paper, like String Theory. I just used my theory as an example for the framework.

Some basic conclusions for any TOE was found, and used to build a framework for a number of theories.
1. We have to reduce the number of gluon's and other particles, and thereby reduce the energy density and bring it in line with observation.
2. Some means of connecting the weak, strong, static electrical, gravitational forces was needed.
The Casimir / van der Waals force needed to be explained.
Mach's principle has been used with accurate results, but the why and how needs to be explained.
Why do so many theories like harmonics and other non mainstream theories also give good results?
3. A true TOE should be able to be explained by all of these, mainstream and non-mainstream alike.


So I guess in a way it is a doctoral dissertation in physics. But I only have a 2 year A.S. degree due to a couple of heart attacks putting my formal education on hold. With Time on my hands I started work on a design for radiation shielding for space craft. Sounds cool, but it was not a complex concept in and of itself. But I had to learn about cosmic radiation too learn how to stop it effectively.

I was referred to a physicist doing work like mine but trying to try and prove W.S.M. theory, based on Milo's work with it. He was kind and very helpful, so I gave their theory a look. I joined their forum and later became one of the admin for the W.S.M. forum. People coming to the forum kept asking questions W.S.M. did not have answers for, so I started trying to find those answers for them.

Over time I started to diverge from some of the points in W.S.M. theory. My paper is the result.


While reading my paper, insert your model into it. Replace my waves with the strings of your model.
The nodes in a string correspond to the point where the scalar waves are in mine. The crest and the trough of the wave falls between the scalar wave. In this manner your strings will match the observed frequency for all the particles.

The finite center amplitude within a 1/2 spin particle is the link to other dimensions as that is where Amplitude, time, etc reach zero in our dimensions.

By keeping your model in mind this way while reading my paper, it may help you to understand some of the other physics.

Hope that helps. Best Regards
Charles

[Profpat]

Thank you Charles.

That is a very good idea you suggested.
So armed with a Physics textbook, a dictionary, your theory and mine, and about a weeks work, maybe I'll learn something.

Mind you strings are both necessary in my theory, but also the weak point. It is the only thing of substance in my theory. Everything else are waves and fields, including protons, neutrons, electrons, indeed the universe itself. ( Austin and RP also like fields and waves ).

I once considered strings to be perhaps tiny vortexs, but I gave that idea up as being too speculative even for me.

So give me some time with our theories and maybe I'll be able to resolve some issues.

Best to you,

Pat

[dipayankar]

I read in an article that there is a type of neutrino that avoids detection because it probably communicates through the extra dimensions of space-time as predicted by String theory... so probably String theory is true..

[mkirkpatrick]

Originally Posted by dipayankar I read in an article that there is a type of neutrino that avoids detection because it probably communicates through the extra dimensions of space-time as predicted by String theory... so probably String theory is true..

Thanks for your input here Dip,I would be interested in the link regarding this neutrino
if you can remember it,thanks mate.


regards michael.

[neutralino]

Originally Posted by dipayankar I read in an article that there is a type of neutrino that avoids detection because it probably communicates through the extra dimensions of space-time as predicted by String theory... so probably String theory is true..

This isn't very scientific, is it, since you have two "probably's" in your post. I think you should provide a reference to this, since I don't believe that it's true! String theory says that only gravity can travel through the bulk (i.e. utilise the extra dimensions) and that the other forces cannot use the other dimensions. Thus, either you are tralking about some sort of gravitino, or you have got your facts wrong somewhere.

[neutralino]

Also, note that the presnece of extra dimensions does not imply that string theory is correct, just like that presence of 3 spatial dimensions does not imply newtonian gravity, or gtr are correct!

[dipayankar]

It just slips my mind as to where I read about it (I seem to be forgetting things. Probably I am growing old). But I am certain I read it about neutralino and not about gravitino.. I will try searching about the article...

Originally Posted by neutralino This isn't very scientific, is it, since you have two "probably's" in your post. I think you should provide a reference to this, since I don't believe that it's true! String theory says that only gravity can travel through the bulk (i.e. utilise the extra dimensions) and that the other forces cannot use the other dimensions. Thus, either you are tralking about some sort of gravitino, or you have got your facts wrong somewhere.

[Profpat]

Originally Posted by neutralino Also, note that the presnece of extra dimensions does not imply that string theory is correct, just like that presence of 3 spatial dimensions does not imply newtonian gravity, or gtr are correct!

Hi Neutralino;

I know you are an advocate of the standard model, but what are your thoughts regarding strings?

Best,

Pat

[RascalPuff]

Originally Posted by dipayankar I read in an article that there is a type of neutrino that avoids detection because it probably communicates through the extra dimensions of space-time as predicted by String theory... so probably String theory is true..

Dear dipayankar:
An 'undetectable neutrino that is predicted by string theory...'

Ergo, 'probably string 'theory' is true... ?

Best regards,
- RP

[neutralino]

Originally Posted by dipayankar It just slips my mind as to where I read about it (I seem to be forgetting things. Probably I am growing old). But I am certain I read it about neutralino and not about gravitino.. I will try searching about the article...

I presume you mean neutrino, and not me Still, I'm no expert in string theory, but I don't see how it could be neutrino and not be a gravitino. (Note that a gravitino is a type of neutrino).