[thomas cuny]

Politics has a center. A checking account has a center. A solar system has a center. The universe is a collection of spinors. The center of the universe
is the spinor with the least degrees of freedom. The center of a solar system
is the chunk of mass that does not move relative to the other chunks of
mass in the solar system.

[mkirkpatrick]

Originally Posted by thomas cuny Politics has a center. A checking account has a center. A solar system has a center. The universe is a collection of spinors. The center of the universe is the spinor with the least degrees of freedom. The center of a solar system is the chunk of mass that does not move relative to the other chunks of mass in the solar system.

That is an interesting idea Thomas,is this
arisen in your own mind,or have you read about it somewhere!Let me know
please.

kind regards michael.

[thomas cuny]

It is an idea that I came up with in the process of reverse engineering
the quark.

[Mohan.C]

Originally Posted by thomas cuny Politics has a center. A checking account has a center. A solar system has a center. The universe is a collection of spinors. The center of the universe is the spinor with the least degrees of freedom. The center of a solar system is the chunk of mass that does not move relative to the other chunks of mass in the solar system.

Politics has center I won't say no but it does have dimensions. I think Guille could be more helpful for you with cultural dimensions.

[Guille]

Originally Posted by thomas cuny Fundamental particles do not have spatial dimensions. How could a collection of fundamental particles have spatial dimensions? Spatial dimensions must be an illusion.

Fundamental particles must have spatial dimensions. If not, they don't exist, because particles to exist must occupy space-time. And if a particle exists during a period of time, it must also exists in spatial dimensions.

[thomas cuny]

Originally Posted by <<<GUILLE>>> Fundamental particles must have spatial dimensions. If not, they don't exist, because particles to exist must occupy space-time. And if a particle exists during a period of time, it must also exists in spatial dimensions.

Fundamental particles do not exist in space-time. Fundamental particles
create space-time. Space-time is a relationship between some fundamental
particles as seen by a being composed of some fundamental particles.

[dleviwing]

No offense Thomas, but that is just gibberish nonsense.

[whoami]

Dimension itself is fundamental without dimensions we cannot explain something because it does not exist at all. A fundamental particle is just what monitors the things. And dimension monitors it.

[dipayankar]

I fully agree with Antonio, all the observations indicate that the Universe does not have a centre. Probably it does, only the light from that part has not reached us as yet.

Originally Posted by <<<GUILLE>>> The universe can't ahve a centre because that would mean there is a point of reference and so the whole work of relativity is partly wrong (at least is wrong in all events including an observer in the centre of the universe, but even in those events not ioncluding it, as some are in perpendicularity with the point they might also have to change in theory). Actually, the universe miht have a centre, but if it has one we must re-invent special relativity. No obsevations have reached far enough to tell if there is a centre or if a tall the universe is spherical.

[mkirkpatrick]

Originally Posted by Mohan.C I need to think on this may be tommorow i will find an answer.

Have you found the answer yet,it has been a few days now?
The answer lies at the centre of the question?

kind regards michael.