Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Theory of Everything > The High Level View
Reload this Page ambivalence for TOE
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Re: ambivalence for TOE
Old
  (#11 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,308
Thanks Given: 724
Thanked 123x in 121 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 74
   
Re: ambivalence for TOE - 01-09-2007, 03:38 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lloyd Gillespie
but the devil is in the details...
Which could be exorcised by an angelic mathematician.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: ambivalence for TOE
Old
  (#12 (permalink))
Moderator
mkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to behold
 
mkirkpatrick's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 7,340
Thanks Given: 348
Thanked 703x in 655 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rep Power: 94
   
Smile Re: ambivalence for TOE - 01-09-2007, 06:43 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
The TOE could certainly be described by a quaternary theory of: matter, energy, continuous space, and quantized space.
Surely there is room in this quaternary for the insertion of consciousness?
Is there not!


regards michael.


Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: ambivalence for TOE
Old
  (#13 (permalink))
9th degree Black Belt
Lloyd Gillespie has a spectacular aura about
 
Lloyd Gillespie's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,579
Thanks Given: 114
Thanked 44x in 42 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rep Power: 26
   
Re: ambivalence for TOE - 01-10-2007, 12:07 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
Which could be exorcised by an angelic mathematician.
That's for sure Antonio, where is he...?

Regards,
Lloyd


"To develop the skill of correct thinking is in the first place to learn what you have to disregard. In order to go on, you have to know what to leave out; this is the essence of effective thinking." Kurt Godel
"Time and space are modes in which we think and not conditions in which we live." Albert Einstein
"The uncertainty principle is an absolute, finite, universal constant." L.G.
"The tick-tick-tick of the cesium atom is a sliding-time-scaler constant of all finite universal motion." L.G.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: ambivalence for TOE
Old
  (#14 (permalink))
Moderator
mkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to behold
 
mkirkpatrick's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 7,340
Thanks Given: 348
Thanked 703x in 655 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rep Power: 94
   
Smile Re: ambivalence for TOE - 01-10-2007, 06:48 AM

Earlier you mentioned Ying Yang,which I consider the primary spinners of formal existance,would you consider these primal forces ambivalent to full cognition of the
toe realization!


regards michael.


Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: ambivalence for TOE
Old
  (#15 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,308
Thanks Given: 724
Thanked 123x in 121 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 74
   
Re: ambivalence for TOE - 01-10-2007, 04:32 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lloyd Gillespie
where is he...?
Waiting to be born? Or be born again?
Quote:
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
Surely there is room in this quaternary for the insertion of consciousness?
Consciousness is quaternarily derived from.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: ambivalence for TOE
Old
  (#16 (permalink))
Moderator
mkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to behold
 
mkirkpatrick's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 7,340
Thanks Given: 348
Thanked 703x in 655 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rep Power: 94
   
Smile Re: ambivalence for TOE - 01-10-2007, 04:37 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
Waiting to be born? Or be born again?

Consciousness is quaternarily derived from.
Well then it is four times a winner,something to think about?


regards michael.


Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: ambivalence for TOE
Old
  (#17 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,308
Thanks Given: 724
Thanked 123x in 121 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 74
   
Re: ambivalence for TOE - 01-10-2007, 04:50 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
something to think about?
The fifth essence of one and only perfect everlasting consciousness.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: ambivalence for TOE
Old
  (#18 (permalink))
Moderator
mkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to behold
 
mkirkpatrick's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 7,340
Thanks Given: 348
Thanked 703x in 655 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rep Power: 94
   
Smile Re: ambivalence for TOE - 01-10-2007, 04:57 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
The fifth essence of one and only perfect everlasting consciousness.
Absolutely spot on there,inhale the aroma of the fifth essence!



regards michael.


Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: ambivalence for TOE
Old
  (#19 (permalink))
9th degree Black Belt
Lloyd Gillespie has a spectacular aura about
 
Lloyd Gillespie's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,579
Thanks Given: 114
Thanked 44x in 42 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rep Power: 26
   
Re: ambivalence for TOE - 01-11-2007, 12:55 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
The fifth essence of one and only perfect everlasting consciousness.
How about a little science, instead of mythology? Stating what can not be proved of the mind is certainly not science, now is it?


"To develop the skill of correct thinking is in the first place to learn what you have to disregard. In order to go on, you have to know what to leave out; this is the essence of effective thinking." Kurt Godel
"Time and space are modes in which we think and not conditions in which we live." Albert Einstein
"The uncertainty principle is an absolute, finite, universal constant." L.G.
"The tick-tick-tick of the cesium atom is a sliding-time-scaler constant of all finite universal motion." L.G.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: ambivalence for TOE
Old
  (#20 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,308
Thanks Given: 724
Thanked 123x in 121 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 74
   
Re: ambivalence for TOE - 01-16-2007, 04:41 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lloyd Gillespie
Stating what can not be proved of the mind is certainly not science, now is it?
Purely metaphysics. According to Aristotle's metaphysics, pure matter is incomprensible. However, absolute knowledge could be attained thru pure form and mathematical structures are just relative forms.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com