It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Theory of Everything > The High Level View
Reload this Page ambivalence for TOE
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Welcome to the Theory of Everything forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
ambivalence for TOE
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,147
Thanks Given: 659
Thanked 103x in 102 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 72
   
ambivalence for TOE - 03-27-2006, 01:08 PM

Can there be simultaneous and contradictory attitudes (as attraction and repulsion) in regard to subjective or objective feelings toward a theory of everything? Any endeavor into the unknown and new territory always seems to be attached with certain ambivalence at the outset.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
write a book
Old
  (#2 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,147
Thanks Given: 659
Thanked 103x in 102 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 72
   
write a book - 03-27-2006, 02:21 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by subversion
yet he seems to think it is impossible that somebody like myself could have.
I think it is about time you write a book about your idea then show it to him. On the other hand if it is published then everyone would know about it. If you really want to keep it a secret forever then don't talk about it any more. to be believed and taken seriously is to never cry wolf.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
same thing
Old
  (#3 (permalink))
6th degree Black Belt
harmonygirl will become famous soon enoughharmonygirl will become famous soon enoughharmonygirl will become famous soon enough
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 844
Thanks Given: 43
Thanked 15x in 15 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rep Power: 18
   
Cool same thing - 03-27-2006, 02:37 PM

Antonio, I think that simultaneous attraction and repulsion are the stuff of life. I once was in a novice debating tournament where the topic was "what goes down must come up" and my team decided to proceed on the premise that down is up, seen from a different direction. I think that attraction and repulsion fit this general scheme. This is true of the TOE, and I think of everything else. Even when you love deeply, there is a kernal of ambivalence. (which of course you keep to yourself!).


The first is only interesting if it is the beginning of something. The first is not interesting if it is the only - Djanet Sears
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
The good, the bad, and the ugly ideas
Old
  (#4 (permalink))
The Observer
dleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nice
 
dleviwing's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,734
Thanks Given: 15
Thanked 130x in 111 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rep Power: 33
   
The good, the bad, and the ugly ideas - 03-27-2006, 03:16 PM

Antonio;
Out of all the ideas that became accepted into the sciences, how many would you say are pure crackpot absurd nonsense; excluding QM, Relativity, and string theory.

Most anyone with a solid background in physics can tell the difference between an idea that is plausible and one that is pure BS. Unless an idea can show success were current theories fail, it is not likely that it will be given any special consideration; unless of course you are part of the academic ruling class. In that case you can dish out all the BS you like.


David

Last edited by dleviwing : 03-27-2006 at 08:02 PM.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#5 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,147
Thanks Given: 659
Thanked 103x in 102 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 72
   
03-28-2006, 01:32 PM

Quote:
how many would you say are pure crackpot absurd nonsense
I haven't the slightest idea? However, I am now reading technological advances as in engineering structures of roads and bridges. They went through processes of trials and errors but further advance comes from just one failure. This is assuming that some designs seem to work beautifully at the outset until they fail. However, crackpot designs do not work at all at the outset.
Quote:
Originally Posted by harmonygirl
I think that simultaneous attraction and repulsion are the stuff of life.
As in human relationships between male and female?


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
maybe the yin yang rules all...
Old
  (#6 (permalink))
6th degree Black Belt
harmonygirl will become famous soon enoughharmonygirl will become famous soon enoughharmonygirl will become famous soon enough
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 844
Thanks Given: 43
Thanked 15x in 15 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rep Power: 18
   
Cool maybe the yin yang rules all... - 03-28-2006, 02:51 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
As in human relationships between male and female?
as in romantic and other relationships. Male-female relationships just take more work because you have to decode everything. I think you don't really have complete attraction or repulsion (kind of like the yin yang), each contains an element of the other.


The first is only interesting if it is the beginning of something. The first is not interesting if it is the only - Djanet Sears
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
positive and negative frequency
Old
  (#7 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,147
Thanks Given: 659
Thanked 103x in 102 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 72
   
positive and negative frequency - 03-29-2006, 12:05 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by harmonygirl
I think you don't really have complete attraction or repulsion
I am having difficulty finding a layman analogy for describing yin-yang without using Fourier transform of spatial and temporal frequencies. Please see this weblink http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_frequency


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: ambivalence for TOE
Old
  (#8 (permalink))
Moderator
mkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to behold
 
mkirkpatrick's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 7,204
Thanks Given: 334
Thanked 621x in 593 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rep Power: 90
   
Smile Re: ambivalence for TOE - 01-07-2007, 10:55 AM

Fight or flight are two aspects of our behavior,there is seemingly an ambivalance "built in"
to our psyche,two aspects of the one energy,expansion and contraction.So the theory
for the TOE will be expressed,or unexpressed with the same ambivalance.


regards michael.


Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: ambivalence for TOE
Old
  (#9 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,147
Thanks Given: 659
Thanked 103x in 102 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 72
   
Re: ambivalence for TOE - 01-08-2007, 02:37 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
the theory for the TOE will be expressed,or unexpressed with the same ambivalance.
The TOE could certainly be described by a quaternary theory of: matter, energy, continuous space, and quantized space.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: ambivalence for TOE
Old
  (#10 (permalink))
9th degree Black Belt
Lloyd Gillespie has a spectacular aura aboutLloyd Gillespie has a spectacular aura aboutLloyd Gillespie has a spectacular aura aboutLloyd Gillespie has a spectacular aura aboutLloyd Gillespie has a spectacular aura aboutLloyd Gillespie has a spectacular aura about
 
Lloyd Gillespie's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,579
Thanks Given: 114
Thanked 44x in 42 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rep Power: 25
   
Re: ambivalence for TOE - 01-08-2007, 08:06 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
The TOE could certainly be described by a quaternary theory of: matter, energy, continuous space, and quantized space.
Antonio, this post I agree with, but the devil is in the details...

Regards,
Lloyd


"To develop the skill of correct thinking is in the first place to learn what you have to disregard. In order to go on, you have to know what to leave out; this is the essence of effective thinking." Kurt Godel
"Time and space are modes in which we think and not conditions in which we live." Albert Einstein
"The uncertainty principle is an absolute, finite, universal constant." L.G.
"The tick-tick-tick of the cesium atom is a sliding-time-scaler constant of all finite universal motion." L.G.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump