Welcome to the ToeQuest.
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 23
  1. #1
    Green Belt michaelrevans@mac.com is below the default
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    60
    Blog Entries
    3
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    0

    The Space Between

    The smallest, ultimate, indivsible unit of matter has 3-identical faces, 3-edges 2-vertices, has an inside and an outside, has spinability,conforms to Euhler's rule and is a regular solid. Go to: www.spaceclusters.com Comments invited

  2. #2
    The Thinker Guille is a glorious beacon of light Guille is a glorious beacon of light
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    62
    Is there experimental background for your theory?

  3. #3
    Moderator mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,259
    Blog Entries
    4
    Thanks Given
    285
    Thanked 839x in 676 Posts
    Rep Power
    149

    Smile

    Quote Originally Posted by michaelrevans@mac.com
    The smallest, ultimate, indivsible unit of matter has 3-identical faces, 3-edges 2-vertices, has an inside and an outside, has spinability,conforms to Euhler's rule and is a regular solid. Go to: www.spaceclusters.com Comments invited
    My comment is that this is totally wrong and the basic idea is flawed,how is it known that this is the ultimate unit???????

    kind regards michael.
    Last edited by dleviwing; 04-22-2006 at 04:57 PM.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  4. #4
    Green Belt michaelrevans@mac.com is below the default
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    60
    Blog Entries
    3
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Light cannot be divided into a smaller unit. www.spaceclusters.org

    the Idea is contained within the trion re' vessel. If you look at the physical models it is self evident. www.spaceclusters.org

    The observer is contained within the observed.

  5. #5
    The Thinker Guille is a glorious beacon of light Guille is a glorious beacon of light
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    62
    Quote Originally Posted by michaelrevans@mac.com
    Light cannot be divided into a smaller unit.
    The word 'light' isn't a unit or a quantity, so please explain what you mean by light as unit (is it that a ray is whole for it is a wave?).

    Quote Originally Posted by michaelrevans@mac.com
    the Idea is contained within the trion re' vessel. If you look at the physical models it is self evident.
    This is not a valid argument, you must explain the evidence and say why the universe is as how you describe it.

    Quote Originally Posted by michaelrevans@mac.com
    The observer is contained within the observed.
    Completelly true, but this is philosophy of science, not science itself.

  6. #6
    Green Belt michaelrevans@mac.com is below the default
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    60
    Blog Entries
    3
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Light is a quantity Light has form and is the basic building block of the universe. Go to www.spaceclusters.org

    Light is the glue between all matter
    Last edited by dleviwing; 04-22-2006 at 09:12 PM.

  7. #7
    The Thinker Guille is a glorious beacon of light Guille is a glorious beacon of light
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    62
    I think the difference between your theory and the general idea in physics is that you give it a different philosophical view point, not that it is a different physical theory. Light is what objects repel and absorb, and eject on each other (they actually also eject other kinds of energies between them: they move each other, they heat each other, they give sound to each other...). So in that sense it is (said in a different way) the glue between matterial bodies.

  8. #8
    The Observer dleviwing is a splendid one to behold dleviwing is a splendid one to behold dleviwing is a splendid one to behold dleviwing is a splendid one to behold dleviwing is a splendid one to behold
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    2,140
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    25
    Thanked 144x in 95 Posts
    Rep Power
    58

    Art is not science.

    michaelrevans;
    Many have attempted to alter the meaning of scientific terms to suit their own ideas; few have been successful at it. If you are referring to light or EM radiation as made up of particulate forms called PHOTONS, then you are misinterpreting the physics. I recognize the eye of the artist in your view, but the eye of the scientist is more acceptable to me. The artist sees 7 primary colors in the visible spectrum, the scientist sees only 3. Your view is colorful, but not practical. Art is not measurement.
    David

  9. #9
    Green Belt michaelrevans@mac.com is below the default
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    60
    Blog Entries
    3
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    I am saying that light is a particle; light is not a wave; Light is a a regular solid. That when viewed from this dimension appears to be a wave and a particle. I am presenting the geometric parameters of physical light - photon. Tell me what is the geometric form of light?

    You may be right. May I suggest a book that directly will address the question of art & science. The book is "Art and Physics" by Leonard Shlain M.D. You may find it interesting.

  10. #10
    The Observer dleviwing is a splendid one to behold dleviwing is a splendid one to behold dleviwing is a splendid one to behold dleviwing is a splendid one to behold dleviwing is a splendid one to behold
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    2,140
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    25
    Thanked 144x in 95 Posts
    Rep Power
    58
    Are you referring to the frequency, wavelength, amplitude, phase, polarization, diffraction, refraction, interference, mass or energy; Maybe you are referring the geometrics of matter waves. Explain what you mean by geometrics of light since you don't seem to be talking about EM WAVES.

    Though there is an art that emerges from natures wondrous structures and a form of mathematical beauty in her design, science is based solely on the ability to measure an quantify dimensional qualities of nature. Art can provide the imagery to assist the visualization of nature but it is not truly a part of the science; it is only another tool like the mathematics.
    David


 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-18-2008, 02:44 AM
  2. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-22-2006, 06:03 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Back to top