[dleviwing]

Originally Posted by Brent Actually that is what Harry said "what is causing the space to accelerate". Since then I have figured it out.

So have I figured it out; over 35 years ago.

Brent;
Since my Toronic concept dates back to 1972 I think it is you that should pay me royalties on the concept of spatial flow. If you do your research on this concept of spatial flow you will find it goes back to the 19th century. Sorry Brent, even though your thinking is in the right path, your knowledge of science and its history seems to be lacking. Don’t ask for payment until you have something to sell and don’t take credit for the ideas of others just because you have not done your homework.

Take some time to read over other member’s posts and blogs; then if you still think yourself to be a unique thinking individual, you should seek someone to sponsor your work and get published.

[dleviwing]

Pro;
Thanks for the video but you really do not need to apologize to me for anything. Though some of my posts may sound differently, I really do not take myself anymore seriously than I take others. The human race is the funniest thing on this planet. If there is a god, he most certainly has a sense of humor. I worked in an environment of scientist and engineer that if someone made a dumb comment, they where told as much without any intent of malice or insult. In that context let me say that your theory strikes me as a silly approach without any real application. A TOE theory will give you the understanding of the physical universe such that much of what is science fiction today will be science fact in the future. (That does not include warp drive or time travel.)

My only intent on ToeQuest is to attempt to put the complex jargon of science terminology into common everyday language; at the same time attempt to correct the more common misconceptions and misquoted science statements that are found predominate in science text. “The speed of light is a constant” is just one of them. Conversion of matter to energy is another major misquote. Scientific theory is another abused term. Theories are not scientific until the scientific methodology of experimental testing have been applied and empirical data collected.


Rather than attempting to explain things using complex concepts that require an understanding of wave mechanics, I simply present the view of “Absolute Motion” in terms of common motions that more people can relate to. Plus, minus, and neutral has no real meaning other than scalar references and those are only significant to the insignificant human population occupying this planet.

The only thing that actually causes an emotional response in me is when someone infers that scientist are stupid or don’t understand. Every profession from doctors to lawyers has their own jargon of communications between them; I’m just trying to be one of the translators. I will admit however that some of them do present pure gibberish nonsense as science. Don’t worry Pro, no one is infallible, including me.

[Brent]

Originally Posted by dleviwing So have I figured it out; over 35 years ago. Brent; Since my Toronic concept dates back to 1972 I think it is you that should pay me royalties on the concept of spatial flow. If you do your research on this concept of spatial flow you will find it goes back to the 19th century. Sorry Brent, even though your thinking is in the right path, your knowledge of science and its history seems to be lacking. Don’t ask for payment until you have something to sell and don’t take credit for the ideas of others just because you have not done your homework. Take some time to read over other member’s posts and blogs; then if you still think yourself to be a unique thinking individual, you should seek someone to sponsor your work and get published.

I have researched as much as I could find for years and have not found anyone who said gravity and inertia are caused by the acceleration of matter relative to space, until after I posted.

I read your blog and could not see where you state gravity is caused by the acceleration of space relative to matter.

I can see some similar thinking to me, in spots but basically your ideas have nothing to do with mine. As for taking credit for others ideas, like I said I didn't see anything in your blog about it. Nice try though.

Actually you don't seem to be on the right path. You could try doing some homework but I think it is one of those things, you either get it or you don't and sorry but you don't.

Don't feel bad though because if I don't post anymore nobody else will get it either.

[RascalPuff]

Dear Brent:

Do you have time to read http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie ?

Lemme know. It's been around - internationally - since '59.

Regards,
-RP

[protheory]

Originally Posted by dleviwing Pro; Thanks for the video but you really do not need to apologize to me for anything. Though some of my posts may sound differently, I really do not take myself anymore seriously than I take others. The human race is the funniest thing on this planet. If there is a god, he most certainly has a sense of humor. I worked in an environment of scientist and engineer that if someone made a dumb comment, they where told as much without any intent of malice or insult. In that context let me say that your theory strikes me as a silly approach without any real application. A TOE theory will give you the understanding of the physical universe such that much of what is science fiction today will be science fact in the future. (That does not include warp drive or time travel.) My only intent on ToeQuest is to attempt to put the complex jargon of science terminology into common everyday language; at the same time attempt to correct the more common misconceptions and misquoted science statements that are found predominate in science text. “The speed of light is a constant” is just one of them. Conversion of matter to energy is another major misquote. Scientific theory is another abused term. Theories are not scientific until the scientific methodology of experimental testing have been applied and empirical data collected. Rather than attempting to explain things using complex concepts that require an understanding of wave mechanics, I simply present the view of “Absolute Motion” in terms of common motions that more people can relate to. Plus, minus, and neutral has no real meaning other than scalar references and those are only significant to the insignificant human population occupying this planet. The only thing that actually causes an emotional response in me is when someone infers that scientist are stupid or don’t understand. Every profession from doctors to lawyers has their own jargon of communications between them; I’m just trying to be one of the translators. I will admit however that some of them do present pure gibberish nonsense as science. Don’t worry Pro, no one is infallible, including me.

Thanks for your excellent reply David, I was really worried but now I'm really happy that you understand who I am and that I respect you a great deal. I also understand your views on my theory being silly, I really do, though in this context I disagree, I guess we'll have to 'agree to disagre' won't we

I said before that I'm not so bothered about trying to explain my theory on TOEQuest any more as I have my video camera so I think this is the path I will try to follow from now on, and what's more I think this path suits me best.

Thanks very much for understanding me as a person. You've really made my day

[Brent]

Originally Posted by RascalPuff Dear Brent: Do you have time to read http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie ? Lemme know. It's been around - internationally - since '59. Regards, -RP

I skimmed over most of it. If your point was the matter as a standing wave in space theory, that is different from my theory/ideas but it is on the right track, sort of.

[dleviwing]

Brent;
It would appear that you have nothing to share or discuss with us. Unlike you, I do have the math skills and I know what works and what does not. Wave mechanics will provide you with the final answer you seek.

[Brent]

Originally Posted by dleviwing Brent; It would appear that you have nothing to share or discuss with us. Unlike you, I do have the math skills and I know what works and what does not. Wave mechanics will provide you with the final answer you seek.

I can learn math from a book. If you know what works and that wave mechanics is the answer where is the TOE.

How can you be an expert on the TOE when you do not know what it is?

One of the things that provokes a response from me is when people who are educated automatically think they are smart. Knowledable and smart are two different things. The ability to remember what somebody else thinks does not equal being able to think.

I came here to find out what the next step would be with the TOE. I am not sure why others come here, some I guess because picking on others some how makes up for some short comings in their life, some may be vultures to feast on others work, some may be spies, some may be looking for acceptance of their ideas.

I do not feel comfortable discussing anymore of my ideas here.

[dleviwing]

Brent;
That is just a lame excuse put forth by ignorance; it’s like saying a rich man cannot be happy. Don’t make excuses for failure to me; I’ve heard them all and have no use for them nor those who make them. I've taught enough of you self-proclaimed geniuses to know.

As for a TOE, neither you nor anyone else has a provable theory. Knowing the physics of the behavior of matter does not explain life and awareness of species. That’s why some prey on the superstitions of others with religion and dogma.

Originally Posted by Brent I came here to find out what the next step would be with the TOE.

NO - You did not; otherwise you would have taken the advice to simply publish it or present it here.

Be careful Brent, Lloyd is one of the plagiarist you speak of.

[Lloyd Gillespie]

Brent, please ignore David, state your ideas clearly and fully. I'd like to hear them. You seem to be the one most on track, of all of us, but it's a bit hard to tell for sure, with such small amount of material to judge from, so please state your ideas, with the confidence of ignoring David, and his incomplete ideas...

Lloyd

Originally Posted by Brent I can learn math from a book. If you know what works and that wave mechanics is the answer where is the TOE. How can you be an expert on the TOE when you do not know what it is? One of the things that provokes a response from me is when people who are educated automatically think they are smart. Knowledable and smart are two different things. The ability to remember what somebody else thinks does not equal being able to think. I came here to find out what the next step would be with the TOE. I am not sure why others come here, some I guess because picking on others some how makes up for some short comings in their life, some may be vultures to feast on others work, some may be spies, some may be looking for acceptance of their ideas. I do not feel comfortable discussing anymore of my ideas here.