Tina.
Quote:
|
Regarding interaction:Yes 'evil' manifests through interaction
|
---What results through interaction is merely a change. That change is good or evil depend on how it is perceived/interacted with.
---That interaction can only occur when you perceive/interact/sense
something, whether it be matter or energy or massenergy or time or space or spacetime or the absence of something.
Quote:
|
but I ask again is it inevitable that 'evil' manifests through interaction?
|
---Yes. No. (Subjective existence or nonexistence).
---Both at the same time. (Intersubjective reality)
---None of the previous. (Objective nonexistence)
---Someone in a previous post brought up a woman in the 1600s showing a little bit of leg, being considered evil. To someone looking at her, in that time of Puritanism, she was seen as a seductive evil being. To the woman, who had been working hard and not noticed her clothing slide up for that small moment, it was simply a mistake. To a person who is into naturism, wearing nothing is considered a good thing and would laugh about any fuss about something showing a bit of leg. To most people seeing something like that happening today, it is neither important nor unimportant.
---It all depends on the degree/level of interaction (between the something and the context that it is in) that you interact with/see/perceive happening.
Quote:
|
Fire is fire - we know its causes - we know its effects! But ultimately fire is necessary for survival.
|
---Again it comes down to how you interact with/perceive it. To someone burned in an arsonist’s fire it was an evil happening. Looking at fire, by itself without any context, it is just a visible form of energy.
---And as to it being necessary for survival; how many fires do you see in business skyscrapers that are there for survival?
Quote:
|
in humans, emotions are bound up with intellect (ie we interpret, add dimensions to, and make value judgements about what we feel emotionally).
|
---The emotions that we feel are as
pure, as any animals, for one instant of time. That pure emotion only becomes bound up with thought after time passes.
---Animals have the same thing happen to their emotions, depending on their level of intellect.
Quote:
|
I only perceived the orcas as using strategies to reach their food
|
---Those orca ,that you think are just using strategy, are part of the cetacean family and are considered intelligent mammals by many scientists. And the seal was actually put back up on the floe by the whales. Are you telling me that that was just strategy?
http://www.studentsonice.com/antarctica2004/html/dec25.html
“The orcas circled the ice-floe where the seal was lying and, using their bodies and fins, made waves to knock the seal into the water. After a while underwater the seal, one of the whales lifted the seal back onto the ice-floe and the process of making waves and dislodging the seal began again.”
---There have been other instances that have shown orca playing with their food, like flipping the seals in the air. Is it for fun, to tenderize them or for to kill them in a
different way other than just eating them alive?
---In any case, to the seal (who is the toy), I don't imagine the pain and terror that it is feeling about its lack of survival is a 'good' thing, since it won't be able to learn from it.