[bottomlander]

Also something inspired from "Philosopher's Stone":

I encountered the following 2 words: gold and goldbrick.
At first, with my poor English knowledge, I think goldbrick is a brick of gold, much larger and valuable than just a gold coin.

Luckily, I know that a responsible person should be cautious to use what terms during theorizing a new theory.
After I checked the dictionary, goldbrick actually means "anything supposed to be valuable but which turns out to be worthless"
and "a brick made to look like gold, sold by a swindler".
This inspires something, e.g. The long-sought "Philosopher's Stone" has turned out to be a worthless "lead stone".

P.S. As for another personal-sought "Simple Truth - Everything equals", will it turn out to be worthless also !

Best Regards. Bottomlander

[sillysally]

Ok, this is why I think the toe isn't needed. If the theory of everything is to include everything that would include opposing reasons for everything. See? IT'S IMPOSSIBLE.

[dipayankar]

I always believe that man is created by Biological process rather than God...

Originally Posted by sillysally So do you agree that man is created in the image of woman instead of god?

[Fluent Piffle]

Originally Posted by sillysally Ok, this is why I think the toe isn't needed. If the theory of everything is to include everything that would include opposing reasons for everything. See? IT'S IMPOSSIBLE.

I agree!

But that's because it isn't needed, it is currently jealously wanted. There are 'prizes' involved, not to mention all 'other' kinds of personal gain. While we have this 'separatist' attitude, it will remain a want, and that means continued opposition. 'Impossible' under current circumstances, but then...everything always changes.



pif.

[sillysally]

Originally Posted by dipayankar I always believe that man is created by Biological process rather than God...

Nice answer.

[sillysally]

Originally Posted by Fluent Piffle I agree! But that's because it isn't needed, it is currently jealously wanted. There are 'prizes' involved, not to mention all 'other' kinds of personal gain. While we have this 'separatist' attitude, it will remain a want, and that means continued opposition. 'Impossible' under current circumstances, but then...everything always changes. pif.

What the? Other people were saying this but it didn't register until the way you said it. That's too bad, just seems like a lot of valuable brain power is going to waste on this toe quest.

[dipayankar]

Still does not tell me whether you agree with me or not...

Originally Posted by sillysally Nice answer.

[sillysally]

Originally Posted by dipayankar Still does not tell me whether you agree with me or not...

Yes, I do. But I think man came much later, after woman. The mans body is better in spreading fat around the body, in the woman's body, fat is more concentrated around the waist. The woman has 24 fat stations and the man has 36.

[dipayankar]

Wow that was too much of a research. Biologically both would have evolved around the same time...

Originally Posted by sillysally Yes, I do. But I think man came much later, after woman. The mans body is better in spreading fat around the body, in the woman's body, fat is more concentrated around the waist. The woman has 24 fat stations and the man has 36.

[bottomlander]

Originally Posted by dipayankar Wow that was too much of a research. Biologically both would have evolved around the same time...

"Same evolution time" was also my first impression.
However, after I read some science news that woman is hundred thousands years more advanced in evolution than man, I recognized that may be true.

My wild guess is: even both woman and man spent same period of time on evolution, woman seems have more chances to have genetic variations, especially because there were more hormone during pregnancy and baby breeding which might incite more genetic variations and thus faster evolution.

Best Regards. Bottomlander