Challenge: A Protheory Based Question

[Mohan.C]

answered
WITHOUT the dynamics between the concepts of Positive - Negative - Neutral.

(Question inspired by Profpat - The Accountant )

0 (zero) ?

[labelwench]

The circle, expressed as a symbol, not as a number.

[greenbug]

This is philosophical in nature. We compare things and relate them. Computer wise negative is 0 and positive is 1. True and false. Up and Down. Any thing that has an opposite can be compared to positive and negative. Yet then anything that has no opposite can be compared to neutrality. I don’t see how any comparison can be made. So at that the circle would be natural. Perhaps more or less rules are needed?

[Tina]

0 (zero) ?

Well for one thing Zero (symbol) is an arbitrary point (neutral) from which all measurement (pos & neg) can be anchored .....without the zero mathematics would be impossible.

[Tina]

The circle, expressed as a symbol, not as a number.

And even the construction of a Circle results from a dynamic between pos/neg/neutral when we consider the relationship between Diameter midpoint and the radius that stems from this midpoint in any direction on the plain figure.

[labelwench]

And even the construction of a Circle results from a dynamic between pos/neg/neutral when we consider the relationship between Diameter midpoint and the radius that stems from this midpoint in any direction on the plain figure.

Thank you, Tina.

The construction of the circle is not the question.

The symbology of the circle, rather.

Regards,
Labelwench

[Profpat]

Name anything that can be
explained or answered
WITHOUT the dynamics between the concepts of Positive - Negative - Neutral.

It's not as easy as it sounds!

(Question inspired by Profpat - The Accountant )

Hi Tina;

So is there going to be an actual answer to this. I'm somewhat in agreement with protheory, that positive, negative and neutral is what makes the world go round. Everything is an interaction ( action/reaction ) I can't see that happening without opposing forces.

Best,

Pat

[austintorn@aol.com]

Pro theory proves 'Potential/Possibility',
which is the TOE and the origin of the multiverse:


'Everything' is positive;

Not 'Everything' is 'Nothing', or negative;

Neither 'Everything' nor 'Nothing' is the neutral 'Possibility/Potential'.

[Tina]

Computer wise negative is 0 and positive is 1. True and false. Up and Down. Any thing that has an opposite can be compared to positive and negative.

However the problem is that the use of opposites, in any other context than that of physical location, is largely a erroneous conceptual comparison. We tend to confuse negation with opposites....but they are not the same things.

The concept of negation (rather than the black and white of opposites) allows for a third option (those gray areas) which can be more representative of the Truth of situation.

e.g. The TV is not (on) but it is not (off) either,
it is in the neurtral position of Stand-by.

Quantum Computing research needs to fully tap into the dynamics 0/+1/-1.

[Profpat]

Pro theory proves 'Potential/Possibility',

which is the TOE and the origin of the multiverse:

'Everything' is positive;

Not 'Everything' is 'Nothing', or negative;

Neither 'Everything' nor 'Nothing' is the neutral 'Possibility/Potential'.

PROVES Austin. Would you care to share this proof. Also you have proof of multiverses. If so please share that also.

Thanks,

Pat