The missing link of The Theory of Everything.

[dipayankar]

Probably, we can also look at the Big Bounce model. This model holds some merit according to me.

I've got head off, but quick comment. I enjoyed some of your comments (sorry I didn't do a great job going through it in detail) and I just wanted to toss in a few comments:

1) Any deterministic set of physical laws leads to a 1 dimensional "logical"/information chain of events and this can be seen as a predetermined physical model that implies no "free will", which in a sense is ironically what the ideal of such a will would be - if free will was conditional and did not act in a predetermined fashion, then it wouldn't really be free

(On the other hand, this would not necessarily have to be reality, but at least any form of deterministic sets of rules we could derive would give this form and I don't know how "randomness" can exist so it would appear it must be the case, though its interesting to consider that a single selection of an "origin" out of an infinite space time would similarly require an infinite quantity of information, which would similarly imply that an infinite number of decisions could be distributed throughout time (though on a smaller infinite scale and less "densely" represented)).

2) Multiple dimensions arise from the influence of a single dimension of causation - there's a single clock that keeps time to everything in order that all motions can remain synchronized in a space and this singular source can be distributed or multiplexed into various ratios of motions in various dimensions. If there was more than a single such source then objects would not specifically move to one position and we'd have to add some higher level arbitration, which would then effectively become the same as that singular source. There could be multiple such sources for time but without a synchronization they would appear to not influence each other and would exist similar to separate existences and unrelated.

P.S. I think the idea of multiple parallel worlds/universes is true, though there's really only one relevant path and that's the unique one that someone happens to follow - the only significant component of this is really that the only control around is self control (in a predetermined sense - wherever you go, there you are, whatever that is, which is a big question mark in itself) and there's no way to drag or force something else along for the ride (just as altering one clock doesn't alter time on other clocks and time is an individual ability/property).

[theunify]

We have debated this issue for some length. Toequest offers us the chance to make our opinions felt in the Scientific community with like minded individuals. This allows us to concentrate on our work harder and provide more opportunity to discuss our scientific ideas. This site is award worthy, yet like so many other small businesses it has failed to attract the large investors that are forced to overlook Toequest because of political reasons; such as not wanting to discuss certain issues which might compromise their advertisers. I think Toequest is one of the best mechanisms for free speech for scientific work and do rarely we ever find the need to get into depressing subjects and legal challenges.

Goodbye Till Later. Bye.

[theunify]

Penz2nz "PenEasy" if you don't mind me calling you that.

1. That is called normalization and it requires the theory to hold up under the most rigorous of circumstances before it can be dumbed down and approximated for text books.
2. Where is this device that you measure "instaneous action at a distance"? I'd like to see that and so would a lot of other people, imagine binoculars to the Universe!
3. Your argument for "zero" is granted, you may now be plenty happy with nothing.

~theunify

Break out your basic x, y, z grid folks and let the calculations begin. It means we are seeing those distant stars where they are right now, not light years ago. We are seeing the surface of all visible objects "through" the light that is constantly present. Because our eyes are limited in their range of function they require a specific range of radiation to "regulate" our perception of what is present in the light. Take away all radiation and we see black. Add radiation to an extreme level and we see blinding white. Provide a nice regulated flow and we see the colors that are rippling as atomic level transverse waves along the surface of the objects we look at. It will also help resolve some of those pesky 1 slit, 2 slit, 1 beam splitter, 2 beam splitters etc. results that keep baffling researchers with that: "It's a wave; no wait, it's a particle" results.

Finally, Sir Roger Penrose once wrote that he believed the cosmological constant should be "zero" and I am here to argue that he is correct. The speed of space and light can both be viewed as zero.

It's space light not space time.

And thank you all for sharing your unwarped time with me.