Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Theory of Everything > The High Level View
Reload this Page TOE Knowledge Value
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

View Poll Results: What knowledges are more valuable for the TOE?
Mathematics 1 20.00%
Natural Science 0 0%
Human Science 1 20.00%
Philosophy 3 60.00%
Other (please specify) 1 20.00%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 5. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old
  (#11 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,318
Thanks Given: 728
Thanked 124x in 122 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 74
   
09-22-2005, 12:35 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUILLE
what "IS" HELICITY
Helicity is an abstraction of the mind using the quantization of spacetime as the product of two distinct energy functions, the zero-function and the infinity-function.

Its value for the differences of knowledge lies in the fact that knowledge could only be stored in energy not square of energy and that the square of energy is a bigger set that the sets of positive and negative energies. If I add positive energy and negative energy, I could get zero energy but if I multiply positive and positive or negative and negative, I get positive square of energy. On the other hand if I multiply positive and negative energy, I get back negative energy squared.

The additions of energies imply linearity.

The multiplications of energies imply nonlinearity.

Dirac's creative genius was his transformation of a nonlinear wave equation into linear equations.

Einstein's creative genius was his transformation of linear special relativity equation into nonlinear general relativity equations.

However, if the energy functions are squared then transformations between nonlinear equations is possible.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

Last edited by AntonioLao : 09-22-2005 at 01:01 PM.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#12 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
09-22-2005, 01:14 PM

You reduce all the questions to ordered-disordered, to harmony-chaos, to postive-negative, to good-bad....In resume, to ying and yang.

But I already disucssed this with you, the whole universe is NOT governed by duality. Duality actually in many cases is misinerpretation of reality.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#13 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,318
Thanks Given: 728
Thanked 124x in 122 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 74
   
09-22-2005, 01:30 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUILLE
Duality actually in many cases is misinerpretation of reality.
But you cannot deny the fact that our mind is dual between sure and not sure of our knowledge (e.g. consciousness of being alive). How can anyone be absolutely sure about anything with respect to ones existence, not even when someone dies because no one has ever told me that he is sure that he is dead. But I'm sure that my father is dead because I cannot see or talk with him anymore. However, in my mind (and dreams), he can be just as alive as he was 30 years ago.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#14 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
09-23-2005, 03:13 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
But you cannot deny the fact that our mind is dual between sure and not sure of our knowledge (e.g. consciousness of being alive). How can anyone be absolutely sure about anything with respect to ones existence, not even when someone dies because no one has ever told me that he is sure that he is dead. But I'm sure that my father is dead because I cannot see or talk with him anymore. However, in my mind (and dreams), he can be just as alive as he was 30 years ago.
Interesting, as we have derived this theme, I am going to start a new thread about what conditions existence.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#15 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,318
Thanks Given: 728
Thanked 124x in 122 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 74
   
09-25-2005, 02:15 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUILLE
what conditions existence.
As indicated by your signature, existence is dual between Q-dynamic and Q-static. For the mind, this analogy could become the duality between knowing and reasoning. However, which is potential and which is kinetic still need some further explanations.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Introduction to 'The Sentient-Centered Theory Of Metaphysics' (SCTOM) mjgeddes Your TOE Theory 10 02-03-2008 06:44 AM
What is Knowledge??? Guille Psychology 88 01-18-2007 07:08 AM
The theory of knowledge. socratus Neuroscience 5 02-15-2006 08:58 AM
Knowledge and Time Guille Epistemology 0 12-18-2005 03:09 PM
three stages of knowledge Properbo66 Introductions 1 07-19-2005 08:09 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com