Welcome to the ToeQuest.

View Poll Results: What knowledges are more valuable for the TOE?

Voters
5. You may not vote on this poll
  • Mathematics

    1 20.00%
  • Natural Science

    0 0%
  • Human Science

    1 20.00%
  • Philosophy

    3 60.00%
  • Other (please specify)

    1 20.00%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15
  1. #11
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158
    Quote Originally Posted by GUILLE
    what "IS" HELICITY
    Helicity is an abstraction of the mind using the quantization of spacetime as the product of two distinct energy functions, the zero-function and the infinity-function.

    Its value for the differences of knowledge lies in the fact that knowledge could only be stored in energy not square of energy and that the square of energy is a bigger set that the sets of positive and negative energies. If I add positive energy and negative energy, I could get zero energy but if I multiply positive and positive or negative and negative, I get positive square of energy. On the other hand if I multiply positive and negative energy, I get back negative energy squared.

    The additions of energies imply linearity.

    The multiplications of energies imply nonlinearity.

    Dirac's creative genius was his transformation of a nonlinear wave equation into linear equations.

    Einstein's creative genius was his transformation of linear special relativity equation into nonlinear general relativity equations.

    However, if the energy functions are squared then transformations between nonlinear equations is possible.
    Last edited by AntonioLao; 09-22-2005 at 01:01 PM.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #12
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    You reduce all the questions to ordered-disordered, to harmony-chaos, to postive-negative, to good-bad....In resume, to ying and yang.

    But I already disucssed this with you, the whole universe is NOT governed by duality. Duality actually in many cases is misinerpretation of reality.

  3. #13
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158
    Quote Originally Posted by GUILLE
    Duality actually in many cases is misinerpretation of reality.
    But you cannot deny the fact that our mind is dual between sure and not sure of our knowledge (e.g. consciousness of being alive). How can anyone be absolutely sure about anything with respect to ones existence, not even when someone dies because no one has ever told me that he is sure that he is dead. But I'm sure that my father is dead because I cannot see or talk with him anymore. However, in my mind (and dreams), he can be just as alive as he was 30 years ago.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  4. #14
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    But you cannot deny the fact that our mind is dual between sure and not sure of our knowledge (e.g. consciousness of being alive). How can anyone be absolutely sure about anything with respect to ones existence, not even when someone dies because no one has ever told me that he is sure that he is dead. But I'm sure that my father is dead because I cannot see or talk with him anymore. However, in my mind (and dreams), he can be just as alive as he was 30 years ago.
    Interesting, as we have derived this theme, I am going to start a new thread about what conditions existence.

  5. #15
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158
    Quote Originally Posted by GUILLE
    what conditions existence.
    As indicated by your signature, existence is dual between Q-dynamic and Q-static. For the mind, this analogy could become the duality between knowing and reasoning. However, which is potential and which is kinetic still need some further explanations.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

 

 
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Knowledge and Time
    By Guille in forum Epistemology
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-25-2010, 09:05 PM
  2. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 02-03-2008, 06:44 AM
  3. What is Knowledge???
    By Guille in forum Psychology
    Replies: 88
    Last Post: 01-18-2007, 07:08 AM
  4. The theory of knowledge.
    By socratus in forum Neuroscience
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-15-2006, 08:58 AM
  5. three stages of knowledge
    By Properbo66 in forum Introductions
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-19-2005, 08:09 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top