Energy, Quantum Mechanics and Gravitation Paper

[waterford]

The implication is that gravity approaches zero as absolute temperature approaches zero (0 deg Kelvin). Magnetic materials lose their magnetism at temperatures considerably higher than that.

[mkirkpatrick]

Yep, it was the best paper if read in months.

The relationship temperature-gravity should be looked at together with the relationship temperature-magnetism. This is because temperature is heat and heat is quantum's kinetic energy, so motion would link magnetism and gravity.

I do think you have a made a good point there.

kind regards michael.

[harmonygirl]

the link between magnetism and gravity makes sense to me. I have started to consider whether the ebb and flow of all life is merely just the interplay between two strong forces and I have been thinking that magnetism is one of those forces.

[mkirkpatrick]

the link between magnetism and gravity makes sense to me. I have started to consider whether the ebb and flow of all life is merely just the interplay between two strong forces and I have been thinking that magnetism is one of those forces.

another word for magnetism
is love=attraction,I wonder what the real difference could be.?
kind regards michael.

[harmonygirl]

Maybe one difference is the acknowledgment that the concept of magnetism contains the notion of repulsion almost equal to attraction. The notion of love or attraction in an emotional sense tends to ignore this reality, don't you think?

[Guille]

The implication is that gravity approaches zero as absolute temperature approaches zero (0 deg Kelvin). Magnetic materials lose their magnetism at temperatures considerably higher than that.

I know, in fact many common-life materials stop being magnetised at around 0 degrees celcious. But my point is that if gravity is the curvature of spacetime, and temperature is the spatial movement of quanta, and magnetism is identical to time when gravity is zero, then at temperature zero magnetism is equal to time and gravity is zero. So we could say gravity zero impplies the lorentz force to be q(E+Vxt) and that is the same as charge times the sum of the electric field plus space. Space here, being the volume covered by the charge (electron) of the elictric field. Does anyone find these connections not indicative that we should investigate this further?

[baudrunner]

I wish you guys would all keep up to date. You are following a Focussed Review and Study thread inititated by Robert concerning some new ideas by Alexander Franklin Mayer. Understand this, and retrace your reading to the the thread originator. You too, HG. You should not have asked for links to the paper.