Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Yellow Belt
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    13
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    0

    Mysterious Pioneer Anomaly

    I noticed in the current science news that no explanation of the Pioneer Anomaly has been provided. I reference slides 76 and 77 in lecture 1 at www.afmayer.net. He says that the anomaly is the result of GTR (gravitational transverse redshift).

  2. #2
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,626
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: Mysterious Pioneer Anomaly

    Quote Originally Posted by waterford
    I noticed in the current science news that no explanation of the Pioneer Anomaly has been provided. I reference slides 76 and 77 in lecture 1 at www.afmayer.net. He says that the anomaly is the result of GTR (gravitational transverse redshift).
    What I wonder though,Waterford,
    is what exactly is a GTR in plain english?


    kind regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  3. #3
    Yellow Belt
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    13
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Mysterious Pioneer Anomaly

    According to afmayer, GTR results from an incorrect formulation or approximation in the General Relativity equations; the error results in a 1 in 45 million effect that produces GTR. It produces a small redshift effect orthogonal to the one normally calculated. To my knowledge, no one in the mainstream physics community has yet weighed in on this result.

  4. #4
    6th degree Black Belt
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    844
    Blog Entries
    3
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 2x in 2 Posts
    Rep Power
    32

    Cool Re: Mysterious Pioneer Anomaly

    Isn't redshift the spectral anomaly that is taken as an indication that the universe is expanding?
    The first is only interesting if it is the beginning of something. The first is not interesting if it is the only - Djanet Sears

  5. #5
    White Belt
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    France
    Posts
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    0

    I have SOLVED the pioneer anomaly

    I have now explained the 6 blunders of the last 85 years.

    1) The pioneer anomaly (hidden matter, not serious)
    2) The galaxy disk shape flatness (no explanation).
    3) The spiral form aspiration of matter by the accretion disk (frame dragging, science fiction).
    4) The matter bipolar jets trajectory (hydrodynamic theory, incoherent theory since the magnetic field cannot deflect neutral matter).
    5) Galaxy rotation curve flatness (dark matter, not serious).
    6) The source of matter bipolar jets (contradicts event horizon theory, science fiction)
    see summary-of-gravitomagnetism page 8 in www.gravitomagnetism.com

  6. #6
    White Belt
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    France
    Posts
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    0

    Allais Effect solved

    Allais Effect has been solved

    1) The pioneer anomaly (hidden matter)
    2) The Allais Effect (gravity shield)
    3) The galaxy disk shape flatness (no explanation).
    4) The spiral form aspiration of matter by the accretion disk (frame dragging, science fiction).
    5) The matter bipolar jets trajectory (magneto hydrodynamics theory, incoherent theory since the magnetic field cannot deflect neutral matter = circumstantial theory = confusion).
    6) Galaxy rotation curve flatness (dark matter, MOND theory).
    7) The source of matter bipolar jets (contradicts event horizon theory, science fiction)
    See summary page 9 and page 1 for new Newton law
    www.gravitomagnetism.com

  7. #7
    White Belt
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    France
    Posts
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    0

    Frontier Physics Evidence.

    Quote Originally Posted by waterford View Post
    I noticed in the current science news that no explanation of the Pioneer Anomaly has been provided. I reference slides 76 and 77 in lecture 1 at www.afmayer.net. He says that the anomaly is the result of GTR (gravitational transverse redshift).
    A central concept in science and the scientific method is that all evidence must be empirical, or empirically based, that is, dependent on evidence that is observable by the senses. Such methods are opposed to theoretical ab initio methods which are purely deductive and based on first principles that could lead to incoherent theories, maths is just a tool that helps us to have a rational approach in frontier physics but the approch in frontier physics must be guided by evidence that is observable by the senses.See page 10 Summary of gravitomagnetism.PDF www.gravitomagnetism.com

  8. #8
    White Belt
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    France
    Posts
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    0

    light dynamics

    By using the light dynamics, the radiation pressure for any reflective surface can be derived. By using the same approach the light rocket engine thrust equation can be derived.
    See light dynamics.PDF www.gravitomagnetism.com

  9. #9
    White Belt
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    France
    Posts
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Mysterious Pioneer Anomaly

    Thanks for your comments. In a two-body problem system, the angular momentum is not constant as stated by the Newton law. The rate of change of momentum (torque) is alternating but due to gravitational waves radiation energy loss, the torque is not symetrical with respect to the perihelion and aphelion line of axis. This explains the mercury perihelion advance. For more details see topic gravitational waves radiation.PDF in www.gravitomagnetism.com

  10. #10
    White Belt
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    France
    Posts
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    0

    mercury perihelion advance

    Since the gravitomagnetic force component Fg is not radial, it exerts a moment of force on the two-body system. This moment of force is negative during half cycle A and positive during half cycle B. This moment of force induces a negative rate of change of momentum known as torque during half cycle A and positive one during half cycle B. Thus an alternating torque, hence an alternating rate of change of angular momentum of the two-body system. There is no conservation of angular momentum as stated by the Newton law. The positive moment of force is always greater than the negative one. This explains the mercury perihelion advance. For more details see gravitational waves radiation www.gravitomagnetism.com

 

 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. 2006-05-06: Dark Matter/Energy
    By Robert in forum Chat Sessions
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-06-2006, 03:57 PM
  2. Mysterious energy loss
    By krateesh in forum Your TOE Theory
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-10-2006, 08:31 PM
  3. mysterious mass muncher
    By AntonioLao in forum Cosmology
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-09-2006, 12:38 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top