[waterford]

I noticed in the current science news that no explanation of the Pioneer Anomaly has been provided. I reference slides 76 and 77 in lecture 1 at www.afmayer.net. He says that the anomaly is the result of GTR (gravitational transverse redshift).

[mkirkpatrick]

Originally Posted by waterford I noticed in the current science news that no explanation of the Pioneer Anomaly has been provided. I reference slides 76 and 77 in lecture 1 at www.afmayer.net. He says that the anomaly is the result of GTR (gravitational transverse redshift).

What I wonder though,Waterford,
is what exactly is a GTR in plain english?


kind regards michael.

[waterford]

According to afmayer, GTR results from an incorrect formulation or approximation in the General Relativity equations; the error results in a 1 in 45 million effect that produces GTR. It produces a small redshift effect orthogonal to the one normally calculated. To my knowledge, no one in the mainstream physics community has yet weighed in on this result.

[harmonygirl]

Isn't redshift the spectral anomaly that is taken as an indication that the universe is expanding?

[nduriri]

I have now explained the 6 blunders of the last 85 years.

1) The pioneer anomaly (hidden matter, not serious)
2) The galaxy disk shape flatness (no explanation).
3) The spiral form aspiration of matter by the accretion disk (frame dragging, science fiction).
4) The matter bipolar jets trajectory (hydrodynamic theory, incoherent theory since the magnetic field cannot deflect neutral matter).
5) Galaxy rotation curve flatness (dark matter, not serious).
6) The source of matter bipolar jets (contradicts event horizon theory, science fiction)
see summary-of-gravitomagnetism page 8 in www.gravitomagnetism.com

[nduriri]

Allais Effect has been solved

1) The pioneer anomaly (hidden matter)
2) The Allais Effect (gravity shield)
3) The galaxy disk shape flatness (no explanation).
4) The spiral form aspiration of matter by the accretion disk (frame dragging, science fiction).
5) The matter bipolar jets trajectory (magneto hydrodynamics theory, incoherent theory since the magnetic field cannot deflect neutral matter = circumstantial theory = confusion).
6) Galaxy rotation curve flatness (dark matter, MOND theory).
7) The source of matter bipolar jets (contradicts event horizon theory, science fiction)
See summary page 9 and page 1 for new Newton law
www.gravitomagnetism.com

[nduriri]

Originally Posted by waterford I noticed in the current science news that no explanation of the Pioneer Anomaly has been provided. I reference slides 76 and 77 in lecture 1 at www.afmayer.net. He says that the anomaly is the result of GTR (gravitational transverse redshift).

A central concept in science and the scientific method is that all evidence must be empirical, or empirically based, that is, dependent on evidence that is observable by the senses. Such methods are opposed to theoretical ab initio methods which are purely deductive and based on first principles that could lead to incoherent theories, maths is just a tool that helps us to have a rational approach in frontier physics but the approch in frontier physics must be guided by evidence that is observable by the senses.See page 10 Summary of gravitomagnetism.PDF www.gravitomagnetism.com

[nduriri]

By using the light dynamics, the radiation pressure for any reflective surface can be derived. By using the same approach the light rocket engine thrust equation can be derived.
See light dynamics.PDF www.gravitomagnetism.com

[nduriri]

Thanks for your comments. In a two-body problem system, the angular momentum is not constant as stated by the Newton law. The rate of change of momentum (torque) is alternating but due to gravitational waves radiation energy loss, the torque is not symetrical with respect to the perihelion and aphelion line of axis. This explains the mercury perihelion advance. For more details see topic gravitational waves radiation.PDF in www.gravitomagnetism.com

[nduriri]

Since the gravitomagnetic force component Fg is not radial, it exerts a moment of force on the two-body system. This moment of force is negative during half cycle A and positive during half cycle B. This moment of force induces a negative rate of change of momentum known as torque during half cycle A and positive one during half cycle B. Thus an alternating torque, hence an alternating rate of change of angular momentum of the two-body system. There is no conservation of angular momentum as stated by the Newton law. The positive moment of force is always greater than the negative one. This explains the mercury perihelion advance. For more details see gravitational waves radiation www.gravitomagnetism.com