But that repeatability is something that is a mental construction and less concrete than something currently experienced.
For example, someone might be standing in the rain and it could be considered rather unquestionable due to the fact that raindrops are hitting them and their clothes are wet etc.
Now why did it rain? Well there are a lot of possible reasons that could be constructed to describe that because those conditions are in the past and not physically verifiable - it's a mental construction and obviously as real as someone believes it to be.
Now I don't mean to say that your description is incorrect but simply that it's not necessarily the truth. It's a possible foundation upon which explanations could be built, but I'm rather certain it will not prove complete either (a lot of people have believed it was as simple as that and yet when we get down to nuts and bolts, neural sciences aren't able to give a good description of conscious experiences either).
We must admit that imagination has infinite avenues,
Very true and understanding that is important.
I think "the actual" is broader than you're trying to portray it though and that's why I posted my comments.while the actual is the actual, so there we have something to go on.


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks

Reply With Quote


