The Best Yet: "Theory of Everything."

[melanie]

It is not me speaking, speaking is just speaking as and through this 'self' ? all by itself.

Was there a person speaking and posting those words in yesterday's posts ?

- what has happened to those apparent events of yesterday?

They are now held within frozen images/ memories - today

- they are still held within consciousness - every-thing / event is consciousness alone -allone

-the consciousness that wrote those words yesterday- is the same consciousness- that is reading back those words today- still here now, nothing has moved or happened-

That consciousness is everywhere all at once- expressed as and through an infinite number of nows-

[sillysally]

Dear Peoples .... please refrain from calling each other names or making derisive suggestions.

The topic is 'the best yet theory of everything' .... please stick to it.


Graybeard (mod)

But what if I have a glutton for a punishment that only Mel can satisfy?

You won't be getting my thanks for making Mel stop.

[Drifter]

About Quest in Search of Ultimate Theory of Everything

The "Theory of Everything" is a term originally coined by physicists to imply a general theory that beautifully and simplistically unites all current knowledge of our physical reality under one holistic description. It would merge understanding of all the known physical forces which seem to define our universal physical reality, as well as all objects contained within, extending to its outer limit. There are those physicists and cosmologists who believe this might even be achieved within the next generation. Some have devoted their professional lives to the attainment of this objective. Einstein devoted the later part of his career toward this end without success. There are those physicists who are developing superstring theory that believe a Grand Unification Theory is currently being formulated.

Do the odds favor the required breakthroughs in insight for this goal to be achieved? The answer is probably yes if this theory ignores the most obvious and important part of our existence, that being the presence of intelligence and consciousness which are the most active ingredients comprising mind. However, if the latter is not included within the framework of this theory then I contend that whatever theory evolves should not be entitled to be referred to by that name. At most it might be called the "Physical Theory of Everything". To be complete a theory of everything must not omit any facet of our perceived reality. I believe that what is being presented will begin the framework for a complete and comprehensive theory encompassing both our physical and mental reality. Such a theory would have to deal with the presence of mind, thoughts and feelings and whatever part they play in the grand scheme of things. Many will challenge this work as an impossible task however I would respectfully suggest that it is not only possible but that the following text represents a strong foundation that interrelates all known concepts of our reality.
The theory requires the acceptance of certain basic assumptions. There is strong scientific evidence to support most of them. These assumptions will be stated early in the discussion. If one is uncomfortable with the assumptions then they will in all probability be uncomfortable with the theories conclusions. This is the only text that I have become aware of that attempts to integrate all facets of our existence into one all-inclusive theory. This claim cannot be made if certain concepts, which have traditionally been categorized as spiritual, are excluded. By interrelating scientific, philosophical and spiritual concepts a rather complete model begins to emerge that integrates all facets of our existence.

[Drifter]

How "Superstring Theory" relates matter-energy and space-time to intelligence consciousness as outlined in the book entitled "Integrated Theory of Intelligence" which is one approach to a "Theory of Everything".

There is no such thing as a pure vacuum in space. Even the most tiny volume of space imaginable contains at least a thin continuous film of energy although in near vacuum situations it will be extremely rarified. The same concept also applies to intelligence-consciousness, which occupies all of space although in some locations may be extremely rarified. This is the leftover effect from the big bang when at the very beginning there was one basic substance and one unified force that has evolved into our current universe which is still comprised of one basic fabric manifested as matter-energy-intelligence-consciousness in space-time with several specified forces.

Matter (atomic particles) is stabilized foci of energy, which is concentrated into very small volumes of space but without form. Atomic particles such as electrons can spontaneously form within space and then dissolve back into space being annihilated by anti electrons (positrons). Protons are extraordinarily stable but would have formed in much the same way as electrons. Energy is not separate from space which means matter isn't either, as atomic particles can precipitate out of space much like a cloud can spontaneously form out of pure blue sky. Once formed it may last billions of years like a proton or disappear within microseconds like a muon. The water vapor within the atmosphere concentrates together to form a cloud and then dissipates back into the atmosphere. The cloud like the electron has no form or defined boundary. The electron like the cloud has no outer shell. It is continuous with space and is indivisible from space. It again should be emphasized that there is one basic fabric that makes up the universe, which is continuous and manifests the seemingly separate properties of matter-energy-intel1igence-consciousness-space-time.
Depending upon which interrelated properties of the basic fabric that one attempts to define the distinctions are only arbitrary and illusionary. We see matter as separate from energy and space as well as from intelligence-consciousness because our measuring devices are designed that way. We have an analog universe that we have artificially attempted to divide into discrete packets for observation and analysis. Since the universe is one complete total undivided entity all attempts to quantize it will only allow for approximations. Quantum field theory has achieved a predictable accuracy for atomic events to better than eleven significant figures. General relativity has a tested accuracy, which is even better. It has been proven to be correct to one part in 1014. Other mathematical formulations in the future may achieve an accuracy that is even greater than this, however they will still remain only approximations. Infinitely accurate physical descriptions of the universe will always remain impossible. One would also reach this conclusion based upon the science of chaos. This also leads to the prediction made by this theory that no two points in space can be exactly alike. No two points in space have the same future or the same past. The difference between two very similar points may not be measurable because they are so nearly identical but it is still the conclusion that there are no two points in space, no matter how small the volume being examined, that are exactly alike. Any point in space is also in a state of continual flux where its properties are undergoing change from one moment to the next.
There likely is an infinite space, which stretches well beyond the limits of the space associated with our own universe. Its properties may be different in some ways. There may be multiple universes which surround our own in various stages of contraction and expansion. If so it would seem probable that they would share a common physics.
The composition of space within our own universe or any other changes over time. It goes through an evolutionary process allowed for by the expansion of space resulting in the continuously decreasing energy density. As the latter occurs this results in decreasing chaos and increasing order. There will be a continuation of the creation of higher order systems over time as space continues to expand.
Intelligence-consciousness is also a previously unrecognized property of space and is present in varying concentrations throughout all of the universe. In some regions it is densely concentrated and in others is quite rarified. Our own earth would appear to be a focus in space that has a heavy concentration of intelligence-consciousness. There is currently less known about its distribution throughout space than matter-energy. This will remain a challenge to science for an extended period of time. Those scientists who have the belief that virtually all that there is to know about our reality has already been defined in physical terms delude themselves.
Space as it exists in our universe began as a near infinitely small volume as relates to its eventual ultimate size which will not be achieved for at least billions of years into the future. It is one of six identified properties of a universal basic substance. The consistency of space has been and will continue to change from moment to moment. The space of the early universe was very much different in its consistency than what we observe today. The basic ingredients were the same but the way in which they manifested themselves would have been considerably different because of their relatively higher concentrations per unit volume. The physics that describes our current universe would probably apply to the past or future universe as it continuously evolves but it can't be certain that the numerical values of the universal mathematical constants would necessarily remain unchanged.
One interesting prediction that this theory would suggest, as space continues to expand, is that the rate of the aging process will gradually slow which would also apply to the rate that entropy occurs within any system. Space as we are coming to understand is a very dynamic and interesting property of the universal basic fabric and at the most elementary level is continuous and undivided from matter-energy and intelligence-consciousness.

[Drifter]

What is the substance's that compose dreams?

Who or what is the cause and for what purpose?

http://philosophersnotes.com/ideas/s...-hermetic-laws

D.

[Drifter]

lol, I don't think all the information going around on the net is phenomenal. Of course more people are going to broaden their horizons or be "awakened" as you put it with all this information at our fingertips. I bet if you go into the village of starving people in Africa, they won't have a clue about this "global awakening thingy", but anyone with access to a computer will definitely be on about it, if it's one of the interests they pursue on the net. I wouldn't have known about it if you hadn't of mentioned it. I think it's phenomenal that you actually believe it.

Different "phenomenal" manifestations of Hunger. Only the verbage[spoken word] makes it different.
Can you see beyond "words" Silly-girl?
You'll come out of the forest someday,
if just for a change of scenery Sal.
"Why bother your pretty little head with things you have absolutely no control over what-so-ever?
Your createing your own suffering and projecting it on others.
Know thyself [-mind] is something one can do about something.
See, "Plato's Allegory of the Cave",
stop watching so much
Television hum? Lol

I didn't say phenomenal,
I said "Phenomenon".

Not quite the same, Silly.

Love Ya,
D.

[Drifter]

Drift...thanks for a thought provoking discussion, I love to debate with you..your style is admirable my friend and oh BTW...keep an eye on David Icke...he is a spiritually, conscious man...notice his lack of harmony as he tries to wake as many as he can...also an admirable man....Quantity of consciousness inside reveals quality of outer life....

Regards Mikal

David Icke, yes, He is "Phenomenal". [One of a kind] The cohones to speak the truth about what he believes, funny thing, I agree with Him on most all, he has more into his investigative research than I have managed to keep up with but, I do admire him, he will be a classic as time will play out the truths he exposes, they will be hidden, covered up etc. As usual.

He has what many refuse to see, therefore his apparent "lack of harmony". He has perfect harmony and perfect pitch, when it comes to the material he has uncovered, other simply find it unfathomable which to a certain extent it is, maybe "Unconscionable" would be more discriptive and true.

Kudos,
D.

P.S. I prefer to keep things at 'a level of discussion and not debate', for conspicuous reasons.

[Drifter]

A good perusal, by all constituents (brothers and sisters alike), would be greatly appreciated.

http://www.cosmicharmony.com/Av/Buddha/Buddha.htm

Thank you one and all,

Much Love,
D.

[Drifter]

Do your dreams at night while you are sleeping really happen??

Aren't they just pictures ?

--there is no difference between those images and the images seen in awakeness, it's all appearing within the same awareness--

--everything happens all by itself, there is no-one to who these happenings happen--

--happenings happen-- but they do not happen to you--

--all doing is done, but no doer thereof-

= A phantom reality.

It's a Holographic Multiverse.
Just as the dreamer wakes up and relizes it was ony a dream, Awakening "wakes us up to what is known as Lucid Living. This waking state is no different from or true essence than dreaming ones self in the arms of a lover at a remote distance in the time and space continuum.

"Consciousness without an object." Is our true essence.
Before consciousness with an object arose, Consciousness without an object was, is and always will be. Tho deeds are done, there's No doer thereof. Who we think we are we aren't, it is only a thought and therefore is non-existent in material form. Just as the dreamer awakens and the dream body in the dream and all its characters disappear so too will this physical shadow of a self end, existence in the waking state of this grand dream/scene/scheme called reality/life end, but, there is more, much more to it than what we typically see/know.

Thus have I been shown.

D.

[Drifter]

lol, I don't think all the information going around on the net is phenomenal. Of course more people are going to broaden their horizons or be "awakened" as you put it with all this information at our fingertips. I bet if you go into the village of starving people in Africa, they won't have a clue about this "global awakening thingy", but anyone with access to a computer will definitely be on about it, if it's one of the interests they pursue on the net. I wouldn't have known about it if you hadn't of mentioned it. I think it's phenomenal that you actually believe it.

Having applied due diligence, I am a Gnostic.

Condemnation prior to investigation is the Height-Of-Ignorance, Silly girl. Lol
Truth is preeminently to be tested by the preactical consequences of belief.
[The proof is in the puddin, Pudin-head. [ My T.o.E. for you, "Term of Endearment" Lol]

Really? Your not starving in Africa. You have a computer.
Are you "On about it"?

So most people are "Unconscious" about it. By choice.
Self-imposed Ignorance, is bliss... and, Thats the problem.
I'm havin too much fun living in delusion to wake-up?
Don't rock my comfort zone?
I wanna sleep-in all day. (Blinders on!)

Do you contribute to Unisef?
Or just wagging on about stuff you really have no interest in?

Just curious. as Your view seems to be gaining a supporter

D.