Welcome to the ToeQuest.
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 38
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,265
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,083
    Thanked 1,411x in 1,137 Posts
    Rep Power
    152

    Who gonna prove Goldbach conjecture?

    Pogorzelski (1977) claimed to have proven the Goldbach conjecture. See more at http://mathworld.wolfram.com/GoldbachConjecture.html
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #2
    The Thinker Guille is a glorious beacon of light Guille is a glorious beacon of light
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    62
    Why isn't Pogorthelisky's proof accepted? Is it anywhere around the internet?

    If I were to say 1 name of someone which I believe has the ability to proof goldbach's conjecture, it would be mine, for my mind is the only one I "know" about.

  3. #3
    Raider of the lost time AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,265
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,083
    Thanked 1,411x in 1,137 Posts
    Rep Power
    152

    not generalized

    Quote Originally Posted by GUILLE
    Why isn't Pogorthelisky's proof accepted?
    My guess is maybe it was not generalized. But I couldn't even find the writeup anywhere in the web. Are you gonna prove this conjecture using binary numbers?
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  4. #4
    The Thinker Guille is a glorious beacon of light Guille is a glorious beacon of light
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    62
    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    My guess is maybe it was not generalized. But I couldn't even find the writeup anywhere in the web. Are you gonna prove this conjecture using binary numbers?
    The thing is that I remember nothing from binary numbers. I did it like 4 or 5 year ago in shool, but we didn't go into it much at all. I've forgotten it.

  5. #5
    Raider of the lost time AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,265
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,083
    Thanked 1,411x in 1,137 Posts
    Rep Power
    152
    Quote Originally Posted by GUILLE
    I've forgotten it.
    I'll email something to refresh your memory about binary numbers.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  6. #6
    The Thinker Guille is a glorious beacon of light Guille is a glorious beacon of light
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    62
    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    I'll email something to refresh your memory about binary numbers.
    Thanks.

    Do you really think they can help to create the TOE?

  7. #7
    Raider of the lost time AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,265
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,083
    Thanked 1,411x in 1,137 Posts
    Rep Power
    152
    Quote Originally Posted by GUILLE
    Do you really think they can help to create the TOE?
    IMHO, the binary number system is more general than the decimal number system. The digitalization of computers were made possible by binary numbers. Compared to analog signals, the digital signal increases tremendously the SN (signal to noise) ratio during transmission avoiding the lost of information.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  8. #8
    The Thinker Guille is a glorious beacon of light Guille is a glorious beacon of light
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    62
    As I said yesterday in the chat session, I have a basic pciture of what I'm going to do to try and proof the conjecture.

    But as the math is very advanced, I need some help.

    First, in order for two numbers to be a "fundamental pair of periods" (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Period_lattice) the ratio of them, i.e. w1/w2 doesn't equal a real number. In order to my proof to work, it must happent hat the ratio of two random primes must no be real. Can the ratio of two primes not be real?

  9. #9
    Raider of the lost time AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,265
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,083
    Thanked 1,411x in 1,137 Posts
    Rep Power
    152
    Mathematicians are using complex numbers to prove Goldbach conjecture. I think because of the additional dimensional plane that it provides. Personally, this conjecture is better prove just using the real-number axis. All we need to do is defined infinity as a number. I really don't know how this can be done.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  10. #10
    The Thinker Guille is a glorious beacon of light Guille is a glorious beacon of light
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    62
    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    Mathematicians are using complex numbers to prove Goldbach conjecture. I think because of the additional dimensional plane that it provides. Personally, this conjecture is better prove just using the real-number axis. All we need to do is defined infinity as a number. I really don't know how this can be done.
    There must be another way.

    Just as proper mathematicians, although with less ability, of course, I'm also trying to prove it with he help of the complex plane. This is why I asked you about lattices, but never mind, I think I'm going to buy a book on lattice. I'm trying to proof that for any lattice with a pair of primes and another pair of integers, they sum of each pair wil be equal and will be any integer. The hard thing is to proof this is for all integers.


 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Back to top