[RascalPuff]

Endless Thread?

Premise:
Reality = Synonyms & Antonyms (refer Tao/YinYang):

For every action, force or manifestation there is an opposite.

Centripetal accompanies and reciprocates centrifugal.

For every given direction and amplitude there is an opposite vector.

Please post any exceptions to - or confirmations of - this proposed rule.

Example: ‘Nothing is real’, equates real things with no things.

Example: Out of an infinitely small point may emerge an infinitely large concentricity; whereas, the infinitely large concentricity is reducible to an infinitely small point, Macrocosmic infinity being no less infinite than microcosmic infinity.

Does this course of reasoning maintain itself, or not?
Are there exceptions to this - and/or every - rule?

Objective:
List all exemplary confirmations of the proposed rule.

Counterobjective:
List all exemplary exceptions to the proposed rule.

(Postscript: please share your popcorn.)

Kind regards,
- RP

P.P.S.
Please note the ingoing, outgoing and standing waves immediately visible upon arriving at http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie

[Graybeard]

Originally Posted by RascalPuff Endless Thread? Premise: Reality = Synonyms & Antonyms (refer Tao/YinYang): Example: Out of an infinitely small point may emerge an infinitely large concentricity; whereas, the infinitely large concentricity is reducible to an infinitely small point, Macrocosmic infinity being no less infinite than microcosmic infinity. Objective: List all exemplary confirmations of the proposed rule. Counterobjective: List all exemplary exceptions to the proposed rule.

Rascal .... My first exemplary counterobjective is to ask for a definition of an 'infinitely small point' ? Is it greater than zero ?

cool bananas ... greg

[N0B0DY]

I noticed right away from the delphi site that the 4-D wavicle contracts infinitely, and was wondering if this was related to coulomb's infinite amplitude or would I be barking up the wrong tree again.

Geoff Haselhurst proposes that the amplitude is finite, to explain the outward pulse, otherwise the in waves would continue inward endlessly.

[RascalPuff]

Dear Graybeard & Nobody:
The point becomes as small as the expanding-accelerating universe becomes large around it, squared...

Cool bananas

- RP

[N0B0DY]

I forgot to give reference to my question...

"The amplitude at the center is finite as observed, not infinite as in the Coulomb rule. Figure 3 shows a radial plot of the electron. Note that the maximum amplitude is finite, not infinite as in the Coulomb 1/r rule." - http://www.spaceandmotion.com/Albert...es-Physics.htm

So the idea is that there is no literal contraction of the center, but has the impression of contraction based on the relative expansion of the universe. Sort of like the land moving away from the observer on the boat, is that correct?

[RascalPuff]

Originally Posted by N0B0DY I forgot to give reference to my question... "The amplitude at the center is finite as observed, not infinite as in the Coulomb rule. Figure 3 shows a radial plot of the electron. Note that the maximum amplitude is finite, not infinite as in the Coulomb 1/r rule." - http://www.spaceandmotion.com/Albert...es-Physics.htm So the idea is that there is no literal contraction of the center, but has the impression of contraction based on the relative expansion of the universe. Sort of like the land moving away from the observer on the boat, is that correct?

_______________________

Dear Nobody:

Thou may'st warm this thread as the nearest Hydrogen star breaking over Marblehead.
Yes. How correct it is may be open to debate but that's my take on it also. Si. Relatively speaking, we are talking about finite at any given moment in space, but, infinite in time.
Thank you.

Regards,
- RP