Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Tools > Mathematics > Theorems and Conjectures
Reload this Page 4D Desargues’ theorem?
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Re: 4D Desargues’ theorem?
Old
  (#11 (permalink))
4th degree Black Belt
baudrunner is a jewel in the rough
 
baudrunner's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 586
Thanks Given: 1
Thanked 37x in 34 Posts
Join Date: Dec 2005
Rep Power: 17
   
Re: 4D Desargues’ theorem? - 01-28-2007, 01:58 PM

Dave, does not a different direction of motion influence the duration of time over the same distance? If the answer is yes, then one may relate spatial distance to time. In terms of our frame of reference, a mile through space is a mile through space, whether through a dense gravity field or a weak one. You were a little rough on theunify, given that the interpretration of his words could be better served with a more liberal appreciation of their inference.


"There is nothing permanent except change"
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: 4D Desargues’ theorem?
Old
  (#12 (permalink))
The Observer
dleviwing is a glorious beacon of lightdleviwing is a glorious beacon of light
 
dleviwing's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,814
Thanks Given: 26
Thanked 186x in 151 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rep Power: 36
   
Re: 4D Desargues’ theorem? - 01-28-2007, 05:58 PM

Theunify;
If you are saying that it is the measurement device (clock) that is demonstrating variance, I must agree.

You seem to have gotten a good deal on a couple of those books! Here is another web site I like for science papers and references: http://arxiv.org/

I often become annoyed when people debate the trivial anomalies that occur within the mathematics; I view this as being the failure to recognize realistic limits. This sells books, but it tends to ignore the real functionality value of the equations and their physical limits.

baud;
The key to your statement is “In terms of our frame of reference”. If we were to view the physical measuring device or method from a universal reference frame, the measure of the mile would appear to be shorter relative to the spatial density or gravity. What I find unusual is that the interpretation of the effect of a black hole is just the opposite.


David
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
duality theorem for time axis AntonioLao Cosmology 4 08-25-2005 11:51 AM
CPT Theorem and time axis AntonioLao Your TOE Theory 2 08-10-2005 06:11 PM
Bell's Theorem Robert Anomalies 1 04-12-2005 08:55 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com