Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 38 of 38
  1. #31
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,786
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: simple theory aka Occam’s Razor

    Quote Originally Posted by Stephen
    I’m sure there are living things that do not have a sense of time. Single cell organisms, for example.
    Didn't we evolve from a single cell organism? At what point in the evolutionary process did any living thing acquires the sense of time?
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #32
    Orange Belt
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    32
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    21

    Re: simple theory aka Occam’s Razor

    It appears to me that having a sense of time would require having a sense of self: self-awareness.

    I don’t know at what point in the evolution of a single cell organism that self-awareness would emerge.

    On another matter entirely, if particles are composed of sub-atomic particles that are composed of sub-atomic particles, etc, then surely everything in the Universe is built from the smallest possible sub-atomic particle.

    In terms of the materialist paradigm of physics, this smallest possible sub-atomic particle would be represented by the number one.

    As particles and sub-atomic particles are states of matter that absorb and emit, then the number one sub-atomic particle would be represented as level [1] on the materialist paradigm.

    A time will come when establishment physics realizes that its abstractionist paradigm is not truly fundamental and is limited in its capacity to explain and specify the process that is the Universe.

    When this occurs, the materialist paradigm will be ready and waiting to be adopted by the physics establishment.

    Stephen

  3. #33
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,626
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: simple theory aka Occam’s Razor

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    Didn't we evolve from a single cell organism? At what point in the evolutionary process did any living thing acquires the sense of time?
    An amaeba "knows" when to split into two,it is a single celled lump of jelly,but it knows
    how and when to divide,all without a brain,it maybe cannot read and write,"Yet"? but it
    does understand division!


    regardsmichael/
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  4. #34
    Orange Belt
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    32
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    21

    Re: simple theory aka Occam’s Razor

    The fact that a cell divides is not evidence that it has a separate knowledge of its process of division.

    Stephen

  5. #35
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,626
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: simple theory aka Occam’s Razor

    Quote Originally Posted by Stephen View Post
    The fact that a cell divides is not evidence that it has a separate knowledge of its process of division.

    Stephen
    Well I agree to differ here,Stephen,The evidence is there in the "fact" that it does happen!
    This blob of shapeless jelly knows when to divide,and then does so!Seperate knowledge?
    It does not have seperate knowledge,it has internal pressure exerted by universal law.


    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  6. #36
    4th degree Black Belt
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    589
    Blog Entries
    6
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    31

    Re: simple theory aka Occam’s Razor

    Back to simplicity theory..

    What motivates us to seek complexity? Is it an egocentric human failing? String theory is a perfect example of seeking explanations of reality on a level so complex that the mathematics cannot be fully developed to justify the theory, not that it should or would in any event. And yet the proponents of this theory are given immeasurable respect as leaders among the community. This theory cannot be tested, let alone proved, as it represents a sub-quantum scale, and we barely understand QM, only observe it.

    The theory that the sun is a colossal nuclear furnace within a mantle of iron surrounded by a sea of plasma is a simple theory, but the evidence for it is compelling. At least I think it is a simpler theory than the one which had been historically accepted, that it is just a super-dense giant gas ball. Simpler because it just makes more sense. The sun has a magnetic field around it, giant gas balls do not. The degree of simplicity of a theory is subjective to the observer, and is dependent on the degree of comfort which one feels with it (I agee with you, tinytree). That comfort is directly proportional to the related knowledge of which the observer is aware to the theory in question.
    "There is nothing permanent except change"

  7. #37
    1st degree Black Belt
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    220
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    23

    Re: simple theory aka Occam’s Razor

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    A theory formulated with the fewest assumptions or no assumption at all...
    2 assumptions = something and nothing

    1 assumption = something or nothing

    0 assumptions = something*

    *requires disproving nothing without making an assumption
    "Just looking for an absolute and trying to understand the relatives,
    and if your relatives are anything like mine...!"

  8. #38
    Green Belt
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    66
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Rep Power
    27

    Re: simple theory aka Occam’s Razor

    Quote Originally Posted by Stephen View Post
    The fact that a cell divides is not evidence that it has a separate knowledge of its process of division.

    Stephen
    FYI - an Amoeba has all the information about life processes and uses it to respond to the environmental stimuli. a single nucleotide change in a genome of an organism (from virus to mammals) can mean life or death. In multicellular organisms each cell also knows it's 3 dimensional co-ordinate.Amoeba can react to- touch, light, heat,electrical as well as chemical stimuli. Any corrections are welcome.

    sincerely,
    yogi

 

 
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. An Intro to what Supertrings are
    By james l. digol in forum String Theory
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 09-13-2011, 05:38 PM
  2. WELCOME TO THE GENERAL THEORY CLUB
    By Serge Patlavskiy in forum Theory Characteristics
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-11-2007, 10:18 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top