Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Theory of Everything > Theory Characteristics
Reload this Page simple theory aka Occam’s Razor
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Re: simple theory aka Occam’s Razor
Old
  (#31 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,316
Thanks Given: 728
Thanked 123x in 121 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 74
   
Re: simple theory aka Occam’s Razor - 12-16-2006, 12:45 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen
I’m sure there are living things that do not have a sense of time. Single cell organisms, for example.
Didn't we evolve from a single cell organism? At what point in the evolutionary process did any living thing acquires the sense of time?


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: simple theory aka Occam’s Razor
Old
  (#32 (permalink))
Orange Belt
Stephen is on a distinguished road
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 32
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 2x in 2 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2006
Rep Power: 7
   
Re: simple theory aka Occam’s Razor - 12-16-2006, 06:26 PM

It appears to me that having a sense of time would require having a sense of self: self-awareness.

I don’t know at what point in the evolution of a single cell organism that self-awareness would emerge.

On another matter entirely, if particles are composed of sub-atomic particles that are composed of sub-atomic particles, etc, then surely everything in the Universe is built from the smallest possible sub-atomic particle.

In terms of the materialist paradigm of physics, this smallest possible sub-atomic particle would be represented by the number one.

As particles and sub-atomic particles are states of matter that absorb and emit, then the number one sub-atomic particle would be represented as level [1] on the materialist paradigm.

A time will come when establishment physics realizes that its abstractionist paradigm is not truly fundamental and is limited in its capacity to explain and specify the process that is the Universe.

When this occurs, the materialist paradigm will be ready and waiting to be adopted by the physics establishment.

Stephen
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: simple theory aka Occam’s Razor
Old
  (#33 (permalink))
Moderator
mkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to behold
 
mkirkpatrick's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 7,340
Thanks Given: 348
Thanked 703x in 655 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rep Power: 94
   
Smile Re: simple theory aka Occam’s Razor - 12-16-2006, 07:21 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
Didn't we evolve from a single cell organism? At what point in the evolutionary process did any living thing acquires the sense of time?
An amaeba "knows" when to split into two,it is a single celled lump of jelly,but it knows
how and when to divide,all without a brain,it maybe cannot read and write,"Yet"? but it
does understand division!


regardsmichael/


Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: simple theory aka Occam’s Razor
Old
  (#34 (permalink))
Orange Belt
Stephen is on a distinguished road
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 32
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 2x in 2 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2006
Rep Power: 7
   
Re: simple theory aka Occam’s Razor - 12-17-2006, 12:33 AM

The fact that a cell divides is not evidence that it has a separate knowledge of its process of division.

Stephen
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: simple theory aka Occam’s Razor
Old
  (#35 (permalink))
Moderator
mkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to behold
 
mkirkpatrick's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 7,340
Thanks Given: 348
Thanked 703x in 655 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rep Power: 94
   
Smile Re: simple theory aka Occam’s Razor - 12-17-2006, 05:53 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen View Post
The fact that a cell divides is not evidence that it has a separate knowledge of its process of division.

Stephen
Well I agree to differ here,Stephen,The evidence is there in the "fact" that it does happen!
This blob of shapeless jelly knows when to divide,and then does so!Seperate knowledge?
It does not have seperate knowledge,it has internal pressure exerted by universal law.


regards michael.


Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: simple theory aka Occam’s Razor
Old
  (#36 (permalink))
4th degree Black Belt
baudrunner has a spectacular aura about
 
baudrunner's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 586
Thanks Given: 1
Thanked 36x in 33 Posts
Join Date: Dec 2005
Rep Power: 16
   
Re: simple theory aka Occam’s Razor - 12-17-2006, 04:36 PM

Back to simplicity theory..

What motivates us to seek complexity? Is it an egocentric human failing? String theory is a perfect example of seeking explanations of reality on a level so complex that the mathematics cannot be fully developed to justify the theory, not that it should or would in any event. And yet the proponents of this theory are given immeasurable respect as leaders among the community. This theory cannot be tested, let alone proved, as it represents a sub-quantum scale, and we barely understand QM, only observe it.

The theory that the sun is a colossal nuclear furnace within a mantle of iron surrounded by a sea of plasma is a simple theory, but the evidence for it is compelling. At least I think it is a simpler theory than the one which had been historically accepted, that it is just a super-dense giant gas ball. Simpler because it just makes more sense. The sun has a magnetic field around it, giant gas balls do not. The degree of simplicity of a theory is subjective to the observer, and is dependent on the degree of comfort which one feels with it (I agee with you, tinytree). That comfort is directly proportional to the related knowledge of which the observer is aware to the theory in question.


"There is nothing permanent except change"
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to baudrunner For This Useful Post:
mkirkpatrick (12-17-2006)
Re: simple theory aka Occam’s Razor
Old
  (#37 (permalink))
1st degree Black Belt
Eric is on a distinguished road
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 220
Thanks Given: 9
Thanked 11x in 10 Posts
Join Date: Sep 2006
Rep Power: 10
   
Re: simple theory aka Occam’s Razor - 01-01-2007, 07:28 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
A theory formulated with the fewest assumptions or no assumption at all...
2 assumptions = something and nothing

1 assumption = something or nothing

0 assumptions = something*

*requires disproving nothing without making an assumption


"Just looking for an absolute and trying to understand the relatives,
and if your relatives are anything like mine...!"
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: simple theory aka Occam’s Razor
Old
  (#38 (permalink))
Green Belt
yogi is on a distinguished road
 
yogi's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 66
Thanks Given: 2
Thanked 10x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rep Power: 14
   
Re: simple theory aka Occam’s Razor - 01-01-2007, 10:27 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen View Post
The fact that a cell divides is not evidence that it has a separate knowledge of its process of division.

Stephen
FYI - an Amoeba has all the information about life processes and uses it to respond to the environmental stimuli. a single nucleotide change in a genome of an organism (from virus to mammals) can mean life or death. In multicellular organisms each cell also knows it's 3 dimensional co-ordinate.Amoeba can react to- touch, light, heat,electrical as well as chemical stimuli. Any corrections are welcome.

sincerely,
yogi
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
An Intro to what Supertrings are james l. digol String Theory 29 07-03-2008 02:07 PM
Super String Theory Mohsen TOE Theory Articles 8 04-03-2008 06:53 AM
WELCOME TO THE GENERAL THEORY CLUB Serge Patlavskiy Theory Characteristics 3 09-11-2007 10:18 PM
The Mathematico-Cognition Reality Theory (MCRT) mjgeddes TOE Theory Articles 11 02-10-2006 09:08 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com