Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18

Thread: E=mc2

  1. #11
    6th degree Black Belt
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    844
    Blog Entries
    3
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 2x in 2 Posts
    Rep Power
    32

    Cool Re: E=mc2

    Great imagery, HBD, although I am not sure that you are correct when you say that music is the providence of the hearing. Beethoven? - while he was deaf as an adult, there are many deaf children who learn and play his music by feeling vibrations; also, Cadillac Eddie and the Rabble Rousers, an all-deaf rock band, and many other less-famous examples...
    The first is only interesting if it is the beginning of something. The first is not interesting if it is the only - Djanet Sears

  2. #12
    1st degree Black Belt
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    247
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 18x in 14 Posts
    Rep Power
    25

    Re: E=mc2

    The metaphor 'music' is old and classic and I think it get's us closer to reality than any (contemporary) scientific method. Nice, HBD, very nice.

    I'm still pondering on this exchange of thought by Guille and Ema. It seems it has to do with different kinds of approach, experience. I favour the Love-approach, because we almost drown in our western analytical stressing of differences. TOE means searching for the related, the making one, that which transcends previous differences.

    Eistein said something about this: problems can't be overcome by the knowledge that generated them. It needs new knowledge.
    For the TOE this means transcending differences. Reaching for a higher level of thought.

    Ema,
    Thanks for the compliments. But knowing the secret of the universe... One can have a hunch, one can try to make it plausible, and of course one can know for sure all by yourself, but knowing for everyone... ?

  3. #13
    6th degree Black Belt
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    844
    Blog Entries
    3
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 2x in 2 Posts
    Rep Power
    32

    Cool Re: E=mc2

    I am learning about the mathematical underpinnings of this reality and I believe the TOE must explain this. Besides Pi and Phi, the 5 Platonic solids, Fibonacci number, etc. These patterns make up our reality and I think part of the TOE.
    The first is only interesting if it is the beginning of something. The first is not interesting if it is the only - Djanet Sears

  4. #14
    4th degree Black Belt
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    450
    Blog Entries
    79
    Thanks Given
    2
    Thanked 34x in 30 Posts
    Rep Power
    30

    Exclamation Re: E=mc2

    Quote Originally Posted by harmonygirl
    Great imagery, HBD, although I am not sure that you are correct when you say that music is the providence of the hearing. Beethoven? - while he was deaf as an adult, there are many deaf children who learn and play his music by feeling vibrations; also, Cadillac Eddie and the Rabble Rousers, an all-deaf rock band, and many other less-famous examples...
    Yes and that is a rare but intriguing phenomenon don't you think?
    Blind people can't see the light but they develope other abilities to deal with the environment. It's not about vibrations alone as it is about the resonance and relationship among those particular sounds what makes the music a pleasureable experience. You could make something to vibrate and not necessarily create a harmonic pattern that could produce emotions... Do you follow me?
    Music is the expression of feelings, memories and emotions in the form of "related" harmonics... But this is a subject that could take pages for ever.
    Love is not a monopoly of humans alone as many used to say. Animals, plants and the rest of living things have other ways to express love that we maybe are not able to "pick up" with our "superior intellect."

    HBD

  5. #15
    6th degree Black Belt
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    844
    Blog Entries
    3
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 2x in 2 Posts
    Rep Power
    32

    Cool Re: E=mc2

    absolutely right, this could take pages! I think we'll just have to disagree, because while I agree music isn't just about the vibrations, if you have never had the auditory experience, who is to say that you don't attach emotional meaning to the vibrations that you can percieve?
    On a happier note, I absolutely agree with you last statement!
    Cheers,
    hg
    The first is only interesting if it is the beginning of something. The first is not interesting if it is the only - Djanet Sears

  6. #16
    1st degree Black Belt
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    247
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 18x in 14 Posts
    Rep Power
    25

    Re: E=mc2

    Harmonygirl,
    I think also The Golden Section needs to be mentioned.
    Look this over for instance: http://goldennumber.net/goldsect.htm
    Harmony in sound, harmony in form, I think it's TOE one way or another looking us in the face. But now the connection with science...
    Has science, modern science, ever researched beauty, harmony?
    Scientists, at least some very important ones, say if there's no beauty in the equations it can't be true. What do you think?

  7. #17
    6th degree Black Belt
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    844
    Blog Entries
    3
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 2x in 2 Posts
    Rep Power
    32

    Cool Re: E=mc2

    actually I think that science has researched beauty...If I recall correctly, facial symmetry was found to be considered beautiful, assymmetry was not considered attractive. The underlying order of harmony can definitely be described through mathematical patterns, Phi, Pi, mandlebrot, sacred geometry (like 5 Platonic solids) for example and I think this would be the scientific and mathematical aspect of the TOE. Perhaps it's correct to say that beauty is in the eye of the beholder, because how can you not marvel at mandlebrot (for example)? I consider there is beauty, even poetry in some equations (and mandlebrot, which is not an equation and IMO more accurately describes nature because nature is not about absolute equality, but rather evolution). Perhaps it depends on your definition of beauty. Beauty as strictly aestethic would definitely not be found in equations, but the beauty of simplicity and discovery definitely is.
    The first is only interesting if it is the beginning of something. The first is not interesting if it is the only - Djanet Sears

  8. #18
    1st degree Black Belt
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    247
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 18x in 14 Posts
    Rep Power
    25

    Re: E=mc2

    Facial symmetry, I read about that. I think one can link it with for instance the Taj Mahal or the Parthenon or even some Barok-architecture or maybe quality-architecture in general, and lots of art in general, music, a poem... I think it has to do with a kind of balance between opposites, not a dull balance, but a differentiated complexity of many elements that still become one and balanced. For instance the Nightwatch by Rembrandt. Complex. Lots is going on. But still it remains a thing of oneness and balance. A TOE would be like this, only then very abstract and general and simple.

 

 
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top