[RascalPuff]

Originally Posted by MJA I finally got it RP, You know how to measure the motionless weight of mass even when as you have said: there is no such thing. The smoke and mirrors of science, I got it! Thanks, = MJA PS: Do you have trouble explaining fundamental matter too?

"Unfortunately we do not have any experience reference to say what fundamental matter is, other than stating it is the only physical matter of the universe". - dleviwing

"So, David, if you can't explain matter, then you can't explain s---!" - MJA

"Easily explained, MJA, what you've written here and there is it." - RascalPuff


http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie

[RascalPuff]

Originally Posted by N0B0DY I for one have to interject to say that RP has very little trouble explaining his theory very clearly, imo, benefiting many by the few. I think though, physicists being the strange breed of characters that they are, a clarification is in order with regards to "acceleration." In physics, acceleration is both acceleration and deceleration.

___________________

For the uninitiated, regarding Nobody's second paragraph above, he refers to positive and negative acceleration - a non uniformly increasing speed, and, a non uniformly decreasing speed.
Applied to concentricities, this applies to expansion and contraction, respectively.

(With regard to the hapless MJA, Nobody is - much - faster...
Kudos to Dave, for nailing what is perhaps the most enigmatic problem in physics...)

Best regards,
- RP
http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie

[mkirkpatrick]

Great thread Rascal . The computer ıs very slow here ın the ınternet cafe.could really do
wıth some faster motıon.know what İ mean!



regards mıchael.

[MJA]

Originally Posted by N0B0DY I for one have to interject to say that RP has very little trouble explaining his theory very clearly, imo, benefiting many by the few. I think though, physicists being the strange breed of characters that they are, a clarification is in order with regards to "acceleration." In physics, acceleration is both acceleration and deceleration.

In the physical natural true experience of reality, whilst driving an automobile, one must accelerate when the light turns green, and decelerate when the light turns red. To say they are physically the same ,would cause a terrible collision of matter, or in other words, a super collider effect of atoms. Scientifically speaking of course.

=
MJA

[N0B0DY]

So you're saying that all things aren't equal as one, MJ?

[MJA]

Originally Posted by N0B0DY So you're saying that all things aren't equal as one, MJ?

You want me to defend inequity?
I'm the unity of equality guy remember.
I'll leave the division of difference to science and religion, that is what they know best.
Sorry Nobody, can't help ya, I will never be a scientist until science unites everything!
And thats what brings us all here, the unity not division of everything called TOE.

=
MJA

[N0B0DY]

Not sure what you mean, MJ. Science is saying that acceleration and deceleration are equal, and you are saying that they are not equal in the real natural physical world.

It implies to me that nature is not so equal after all, no?

[MJA]

I will add this thought to the problem of measure:
The benefits of unity or equality far exceed the divisiveness or division of inequity.

The path is clear!

=
MJA

PS: Which way are you going?

[RascalPuff]

With the distinguished tentative exception of yourself, MJA, everything and person appears to be going 'up'.

"Which way are you going?"

Indeed...

Regards,
- RP

[Lloyd Gillespie]

Very important point Rascal;

Originally Posted by Rascal write that there is no such thing as the absence of positive and negative - inert and heavy - mass value; both values accompany all matter. End quote... Can you give an example of an inert mass? All matter has an inertial mass value, positive and negative. It's positive mass value is the tendency for it to remain in motion once in motion, its negative mass value is rest mass tendency to resist forces acting upon it.

Regards,
Lloyd