a fundamental requirement to legitimate TOE

[W.GUGLINSKI]

Actually as i mentioned before my Idea embraces the thought of the proton and neutron being able to convert to one another


Pat, there are many other theoretical restrictions against the model of neutorn formed by proton+electron.

First of all, the electron capture by nuclei performs a paradox in Quantum Mechanics.
Indeed, in order to keep an electron within a nucleus, it is required a force which is 1000 times stronger than the strong nuclear force.
Therefore, as it is impossible (according to QM) for the electron to be kept within a nucleus, why a hell would a nucleus capture an electron ? Quantum Mechanics has not answer for such a paradox.

But the model of neutron formed by proton and electron violates the Fermi-Diract statitistics.
Moreover, the magnetic moment of the electron is 1000 times stronger than the magnetic moment of the neutron. Therefore it seems to be impossible a neutron to be constituted by proton+electron.

Besides, the mass of the neutron is greater than the mass of proton added to the mass of electron. If the neutron should be constituted by p+e, its mass would have to be smaller than that infered from experiments (because ot the packing loss).

Do you have answers for these questions ?

[W.GUGLINSKI]

After seeing the way that that thread has gone on the above linked forum, I don't really wish to continue this discussion!



Why ?

Do you agree to Mr. Autymn, when he states:
"The [inner] radius of the elèctròn is bigger than the
[inner] radius of a protòn or neutròn, by Coulomb's
law and mass-energy equivalense" ??

Or when he claims that mass is variant ??