poll: toppling the predecessors

[thomas cuny]

Do you think that if Newton or Einstein were wrong I would be studying them in school? I don't think so.

It is said Einstein proofed Newton wrong, but no, what he did, is make it more exact and perfect, because Newton's works are good for small speeds (relative to c). Newton is used to calculate thinks for satelites and others. When things aproach speed of light, then, Eisntein is needed.

When mass is a black hole, Einstein is wrong.
When time is greater that one trillion years, Einstein is wrong.

[mkirkpatrick]

When mass is a black hole, Einstein is wrong.
When time is greater that one trillion years, Einstein is wrong.

That is quite a statement Thomas,could you possibly elaborate on this for me,as I cannot understand the full meaning of what you are saying?

kind regards michael.

[Guille]

When mass is a black hole, Einstein is wrong.
When time is greater that one trillion years, Einstein is wrong.

Einstein wasn't exact, but definatelly he described many things in nature. It might be true that we can go faster than the speed of light, in contrary to what he said, and also it might be true that we won't go backwards in time when we are faster than light. Now, time is NOT ever a trillion years. Also, he wasn't wrong about black holes, he simply didn't describe them. But all the theory of blakc holes came directly fromh is theory of gravity.

[thomas cuny]

That is
quite a statement Thomas,could you possibly elaborate on this for me,as I
cannot understand the full meaning of what you are saying?

kind regards michael.

A trillion years in the past and a trillion years in the future the speed of light will not be the same as it is now, light did not and will not exist, spatial dimensions did not and will not exist.

[Guille]

A trillion years in the past and a trillion years in the future the speed of light will not be the same as it is now, light did not and will not exist, spatial
dimensions did not and will not exist.

Let's assume your idea of the universe is correct (something that, to whoever has the minimum knowledge in physics, is absurd). In that case, we can't see, cause light (which is what we see) doesn't exist. Also, EM doesn't propagate, it can only be in form of field. Also, there is no space, so we have no dimensional extension, nor does anything. But it is a necessary implication that if there is no space, there is no time (as it is a necessary implication that if there is space, there is time), so then everything is motionless, and my fingers cannot be moving typing on my keyboard, nor if they moved at all they would be able to click nothing cause they are spatially dimensionless... There are hundreds of other absurdities, but it is a waste of time, energy, space, and force, to continue.