Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Theory of Everything > Theory Characteristics
Reload this Page poll: toppling the predecessors
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

View Poll Results: who was wrong?
Einstein was wrong 1 6.25%
Einstein and Newton were wrong 4 25.00%
nobody was wrong 11 68.75%
Voters: 16. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
poll: toppling the predecessors
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
Banned
subversion is on a distinguished road
 
subversion's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 562
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 4x in 4 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2005
Rep Power: 0
   
poll: toppling the predecessors - 04-22-2005, 03:18 PM

many people think that the TOE should show that Einstein was wrong
how many people would agree with this?

also, if you think this is the case, do you think that the TOE might also show that Newton was wrong?

Or do you think that the TOE will be perfectly in line with what has come before?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
None
Old
  (#2 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 48
   
None - 04-22-2005, 06:46 PM

Do you think that if Newton or Einstein were wrong I would be studying them in school? I don't think so.

It is said Einstein proofed Newton wrong, but no, what he did, is make it more exact and perfect, because Newton's works are good for small speeds (relative to c). Newton is used to calculate thinks for satelites and others. When things aproach speed of light, then, Eisntein is needed.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#3 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 79
   
04-23-2005, 05:07 PM

what most physical theories trying to do is to find out whether reality is a field or a particle. But the equations are almost always the change of something with respect to time on one side of the equation and with respect to space on the other side.

The exception to this rule is Einstein's field equations of general relativity.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 48
   
04-23-2005, 05:21 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
what most physical theories trying to do is to find out whether reality is a field or a particle. But the equations are almost always the change of something with respect to time on one side of the equation and with respect to space on the other side.

The exception to this rule is Einstein's field equations of general relativity.
what? reality is a concept, not a particle or a field......Isn't that correct?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#5 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 79
   
04-23-2005, 05:28 PM

I meant objective reality, i.e., the environment, the external world in contrast to inner worlds of the mind.

Einstein once believed that the external world is beyond our full comprehension since it has an independent existence. The best we can do about it is to model by idealization using the language of mathematics. The validity of our models can then be verified by experimentations. But experimentations cannot recreate the math, it can only agree with the math. If they don't agree, either the math is wrong or the experiment is faulty or both but science always hopes that theory and experiment do always agree so that we can move on to the next step of the quest.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#6 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 48
   
04-23-2005, 05:31 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
I meant objective reality, i.e., the environment, the external world in contrast to inner worlds of the mind.
oooooooooooo...................... true.

That is probably the meaning of human existence: understand nature, and one thing of nature, is in fact, you.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#7 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 79
   
04-23-2005, 05:48 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUILLE
That is probably the meaning of human existence: understand nature, and one thing of nature, is in fact, you.
According to Einstein's special theory of relativity, by looking far enough into space, beyond the boundary of the universe, what you will see is the back of head. If you do see the back of your head, this proves that spacetime is curved and that the geodesic line of a curved Riemann surface is a great circle of a sphere.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#8 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 48
   
04-23-2005, 05:54 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
According to Einstein's special theory of relativity, by looking far enough into space, beyond the boundary of the universe, what you will see is the back of head. If you do see the back of your head, this proves that spacetime is curved and that the geodesic line of a curved Riemann surface is a great circle of a sphere.
yes? but that has no sence. Would I be whatching me exactly, or another me in toe very near parallel universe?.......

Anyway, what does Newton have to do with all this?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#9 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 79
   
04-23-2005, 06:04 PM

In Newton's separation of absolute space and absolute time, you can go on forever without ever coming back to your starting point but spacetime geometry allows you to come back to the starting point if and only if you are moving along a geodesic line.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#10 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 48
   
04-23-2005, 06:05 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
In Newton's separation of absolute space and absolute time, you can go on forever without ever coming back to your starting point but spacetime geometry allows you to come back to the starting point if and only if you are moving along a geodesic line.
does then Special relativity allow to to move along a geodesic line in spacetime? I mean, in space, and in time? it wouild be strange just suddenly appearing in the beggining of the universe...........
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com