'Synthesizing Quantum, Relativity and String Theory and Space Time Continum-Part Deux

[Quantum]

I continue here summarizing parts of my previously published "White Paper" . . . . . . .

Einstein in his later years was convinced that the space-time continuum was not continuous, but was discrete and granular, like matter and energy was shown to be in the photoelectric work of Einstein that demonstrated that matter/energy cannot be reduced beyond a minimal packet of energy, where the distance for one photon to travel distance r to complete one cycle of its minimal disturbance in the electromagnetic field is related to its momentum, mv, such that mvr = h.
He also found that for electrons to be ejected from metal, they had to be hit by photons of a certain minimal energy determined by the photons energy, where blue photons provided enough energy, but red photons did not provide the minimal, discrete amount of energy to free the electrons, for which he won a Nobel prize.

I have developed some quantum gravitational equations that unintentionally is showing what Einstein was describing before he died. In the equations, it is not the exchange of the gravitons with the masses, but instead it is the exchange of the gravitons with space-time or the "atoms" of space-time.

If gravity was the exchange between say the earth and sun, then the string equation would not require 2pi times r, but would only require 2 times r as in the original, ancient string equation put forward by the fundamental string equation of Mersenne-Galileo-Pythagoras, where the wavelength of a vibrating string fixed by two endpoints (say the sun and earth for comparison purposes) is lambda = 2 r/n, where r is the length of the string and n indicates the harmonic number of the wavelength and frequency. The equation is in almost every basic physics book, but without any credit given to its fundamental creators.

My equation previously published equation is
Tension of string (force of gravity) = (fundamental frequency, which in gravity's case is found to be 2 pi r/1)^2 times (linear density mu, which is smaller mass m/ string length r) times (wavelength lambda(n), where lambda(n) = (n h)/(m v))^2

Or more simply stated,
T = (v/lambda)^2 times m/r times ((n h)/(m v))^2 = f^2*m/r*lambda(n)^2,
where n = m v 2 pi r / h= (sqrt(GMr) m)/ h-bar, where M is larger mass, and m is smaller orbiting mass.

So the QRSTU quantum gravity equation above reveals that the gravitons are interacting with the space-time the bodies of mass are traversing. It appears that higher frequency gravitons produce greater gravitational force, however, you will note that in the first part of the equation the frequency is for the fundamental frequency, which is in the order of 10^-3 Hertz (in a range that researchers are looking for to detect gravitational waves), where the speed of the graviton, the speed of light c, is divided by its fundamental wavelength, where n =1. It is the third part of the equation, where lambda(n) is squared that we find the frequency of the graviton is above 10^70 Hertz.(which is completely out of the range researchers are looking for to detect gravitational waves).
It makes sense that gravitons could have such extreme ranges because we know gravity can cut through anything, which means it must be of a high frequency.

However, the fact that the strength of gravity is so weak implies that the frequency of gravitational waves must be at the low end (more in the 10^-3 range). We can explain the discrepancy by saying that the high frequency waves are of very low amplitude, and that the low frequency waves are at a very high amplitude. Since gravitons are theorized by Dirac to be spin 2, this implies possibly two divergent waves that intersect at 45 degrees. I have read about this, but do not understand it exactly, except to say that it allows gravitons to fit through anything by first stretching in one direction and compressing in another, and in the next wave compressing in the direction it was stretching, then stretching in the direction it was compressing. This is believed to be the reason why gravitons appear to be able to enter higher dimensional space. In the QRSTU quantum gravity equations, n represents the dimension. Hence, we have shown gravitons in dimensions of at least the order of 77 (earth-sun), which means the 10^77 dimension.

I made a mistake proposing which dimensions were responsible for dark matter and which for dark energy. Maybe, we should just generally state that the attractive harmonics represent regular gravity, the slightly attractive harmonics represent dark matter, and the unattractive harmonics represent dark energy, and letting whichever dimension they are in be left to God. We should not be telling God which dimension the different force particles are in, or put a limit to the number of dimensions.

We found the gravitational attraction between Mercury, Earth, and Pluto first using QRSTU, then found what Newton would have. The results predicted by QRSTU are close to Newton's, but not exactly the same. (see previous posts under Reese-Newton effect)

[Quantum]

[QUOTE=Quantum;91128]gravitons are interacting with the space-time the bodies of mass are traversing. [QUOTE=Quantum;91128]

[MJA]

[quote=Quantum;91128]

My equation previously published equation is
Tension of string (force of gravity) = (fundamental frequency, which in gravity's case is found to be 2 pi r/1)^2 times (linear density mu, which is smaller mass m/ string length r) times (wavelength lambda(n), where lambda(n) = (n h)/(m v))^2

Or more simply stated,
T = (v/lambda)^2 times m/r times ((n h)/(m v))^2 = f^2*m/r*lambda(n)^2,
where n = m v 2 pi r / h= (sqrt(GMr) m)/ h-bar, where M is larger mass, and m is smaller orbiting mass.

quote]

If I may,

The only thing true in you equation is = and all the rest is theoretical uncertainty at best. Perhaps you might try reducing your equation to truth.

=
MJA

[KWAOUAR]

So the QRSTU quantum gravity equation above reveals that the gravitons are interacting with the space-time the bodies of mass are traversing.

interaction 1832, from inter- + action.interact 1839, probably a back formation from interaction. Related: Interacted; interacting.interplay 1862, from inter- + play. "Reciprocal play," thus "free interaction."transverse (adj.) "lying across," 1590s (earlier transversary, c.1400), from L. transversus "turned or directed across," pp. of transvertere "turn across," from trans- "across" + vertere "to turn" (see versus). The verb transvert is recorded from early 15c.
See the waist line being transpernt with pavement. [transversal light radiation reflection]
(light refraction)

[KWAOUAR]

So the QRSTU quantum gravity equation above reveals that the gravitons are interacting with the space-time the bodies of mass are traversing.

interaction 1832, from inter- + action.
interact 1839, probably a back formation from interaction. Related: Interacted; interacting.
interplay 1862, from inter- + play. "Reciprocal play," thus "free interaction.
"transverse (adj.) "lying across," 1590s (earlier transversary, c.1400), from L. transversus "turned or directed across," pp. of transvertere "turn across," from trans- "across" + vertere "to turn" (see versus). The verb transvert is recorded from early 15c.
See the waist line being transpernt with pavement. [transversal light radiation reflection]
(light refraction)