A General Geometric Formulation of FS Mass To Gravity…”Everything physical is three dimensional; No such a thing as a physical entity having less than that. These are just the fantasy games of mathematicians and why theories such as “String Theory” are basically worthless without any testable evidence. You need to stop throwing gasoline on the fires of ignorance!” David
Tim discovers superior mechanics of Dave’s FS wave/motion system: Inverse Scalar Mass, at limit, is exactly proportional to linear FS motion in angular momentum/spin__Va = Vu « Vr ® Vu ® ∞… FS Mass, at limit, is inversely proportional to linear matter motion, in scalar mass decrease of Va = Vu « Vr ® Vu ® ∞… Mass is an inverse scalar wave of FS in Absolute motion, to limits… This is all being figured in Non-linear Geometry ® ∞… ® ∞ simply means a recursively cycling absolute FS Wave Motion Mechanical System… Scalar waves super-position at Vu « Vr hydrodynamic limits, and cancel/unite__into re-cycle, through nearest absolute zero k motion dynamics of quantum state changes, created by the scalar decay of finity’s FS Mass Motions toward infinity, and its least dense state of Ma, or Mass Absolute = Total Field EM-Mass__at scalar maximum__The Higgs Field, by the necessity of the mechanics offered…
After re-studying the three FS Motion System Models, thus far discussed at the many threads of this forum, the above is the general interpretations I’ve arrived at. This is only a preliminary synopsis. Right or wrong, all mistakes involved are my own__but, after looking at what the three models have to offer at total solutions, I found all three offer pieces of what’s truly needed to solve, not only all the physical dynamics, but the entire unification of the maths involved between RM and Qm…
Dave’s model deserves the most credit for steering us all toward a better understanding of the Absolute Fundamentals this Universe of ours consists of. Tim’s model deserves the credit of giving the vision of the most complete Mass to Gravity mechanics. My model deserves the credit of giving the general overall scientific c-light velocity framework, necessary to fit all three models within. Dave’s may be the most powerful tool model, but Tim’s offers its most insightful tool model simplicity, where mine offers the most complete model mechanics of the perpetual motion spontaneous necessity of total motion. Dave’s model allows us to virtually step outside the entire Universe to get the largest objective view of the system’s mechanics. Tim’s model allows us to see the same mechanics with an objective view being contained within the entire 3D-EM-Field. My model offers a triadic objective views perspetive__One absolutely outside the entire universe, with a virtual Universal Cyclatron view__One of a Total and Eternal Re-Cycling Mechanics, with a Hydrodynamic Prime Mover__and, one of possible Universal Formulations, using Non-Linear Geometry and Algebra, corresponding to our Physical Universal Systems’ Substances and Mehanics of, which will still require much explanation…
Criticisms of all three models would be as such: Dave’s model steps outside of known science, with his virtual absolute motion model requiring faster than light absolute mechanics__I feel this is a major drawback for the real physical Universe being represented, yet the model still offers the most powerful tool of Universal Wave Motion Mechanics, which I see as an excellent achievement of David. Tim’s model offers possibly the most important vision of the possibility of the formulatable maths, from the greatest Universal Motions, all the way to the finest of hyper-fine structures of the hydrogen atom, in my view__but lacks the maths themselves. My model offers the most precise scientific logic and maths, due to respecting c-light velocity, which no science has thus far exceeded in experiments, anywhere__yet my model had lacked the motion mechanics offered by Dave’s and Tim’s models, at the finer, finest and more gross Universal levels, as mine has been, from the beginning, more concentrated on the total possibility of Fundamental Motion’s Absolutely Necessary Mechanics push/force, if I can state it that way, as it’s actually eternal, as a Virtual/Real Prime Mover, really being the Central Mechanics of All Universal Motion__centered on A Least Action Law of Wave Super-Symmetry, at limit…
Now, there’s no doubt, the most credit goes to Dave, but Dave’s model could not have been finished and made to correspond with our Real Universal Physical Systems without Tim’s and My models__So, in the end__It’s a Triadic Effort Model, yet with many others at TQ, to be thanked also…
All mistakes and omissions mine,
Lloyd
P.s.
Graham, your mathematical modeling skills will be needed here also, to help finish my mathematical modeling in projective logic and non-linear algebra and geometry, as these absolute models can be formulated in such. All those mathematical papers I loaded on you may come in handy, as I'm looking at an isomorphic mapping of all the Universal Laws and Actions into larger, and smaller, Universal and eigenvector spaces__allowing better visions into the hyper-fine structures, along with the total structures. This can be acomplished with such projective ratio-logics and maths. Imo, we're looking at an Absolute Energy Particle, of Mass/Energy Potential__The Higgs, and its Universal Field Mechanics over time/distance. Crude and general for now, but anyway...


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote



