[Guille]

Originally Posted by AntonioLao I am developing it into a theory of spacetime quantization and one of the results that I was able to get out of it is the calculated mass ratio of proton and electron within 1% discrepancy of the experimental value.

Did you send me a paper with this result?

Could you send it to me?

[volantis]

Originally Posted by AntonioLao I am developing it into a theory of spacetime quantization and one of the results that I was able to get out of it is the calculated mass ratio of proton and electron within 1% discrepancy of the experimental value.

This is something I have also done, but to an accuracy of three decimal places. The full explanation is in my book, but the final equation for the mass ration of the proton to electron is:

2^5*pi^3*Phi^2/sqrt(2)

I have a web page that briefly describes the number as well.
http://www.16pi2.com/particle_gap_number.htm

Dave

[AntonioLao]

Originally Posted by GUILLE Could you send it to me?

I'll send it at a later date since it needs reprocessing.

Originally Posted by volantis I have a web page that briefly describes the number as well.

I'll look at your calculation more carefully at a later date. Similarly, I did have a factor of square root of 2 but the other factors are from matrix multiplication of H+ and H-, which are singular matrices (determinants are zero).

[Guille]

Antonio,

Let me know when you are going to send it (I don't always check my e-mail).

Volantis,

I read the small page you gave linked to, but, my question arises:

Do you have an explenation about why each figure and operation is where it is?

[AntonioLao]

Originally Posted by GUILLE Let me know when you are going to send it (I don't always check my e-mail).

I could send you part of it at the latest by end of this week. This coming Sunday.

[thomas cuny]

Originally Posted by volantis I understand quite well where you are coming from. For the past three and a half years I have been developing a mathematical, empirically based TOE. It didn't start that way, but it turned out that way.

Paolo Budinich wrote a theory of everything and published it.
See hep-th/0311045 "Internal Symmetry from Division Algebras
in Pure Spinor Geometry".
Even though he is a member of the physics community, nobody has
accepted what he wrote.

[dleviwing]

If you would like to read the original paper go here:
http://www.imath.kiev.ua/~snmp2003/Proceedings/budinich.pdf

[mkirkpatrick]

Originally Posted by thomas cuny Paolo Budinich wrote a theory of everything and published it. See hep-th/0311045 "Internal Symmetry from Division Algebras in Pure Spinor Geometry". Even though he is a member of the physics community, nobody has accepted what he wrote.

Why do you think this is then?
Is there a valid reason that you could think of.Maybe his idea was too
off beam for them?


kind regard michael.