[quanta07]

Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick Time that which we expand into and fill,we seem to be within it!As a fish is within the ocean,another name for time would be evolution,the evolution of the physical universe.Time is really no more than a concept arising within an inquiring mind? kind regards michael.

Hi Michael,
Inquiring minds want to know? I like your view “as a fish within the ocean”. I no longer believe time to be insignificant or a product of human thought. Time was here long before man came along and noticed it. We cannot claim it as our own thought process and we cannot dismiss it as nonexistent.
Linear time……..
I guess discussing the subject of time, for some people, seems to lead to nervousness about their own reality. I believe it only reinforces reality and changes nothing. Time has properties we can observe.
Time has a direction, with magnitude that is measurable and countable. These properties are geometric vector properties.(a vector is any line having direction and magnitude) Its direction is the future with a magnitude you may choose. An orbit, a single planetary spin chopped into 24 hours, an eon. No matter what magnitude you choose, the behavior of time is that of a vector. I believe this behavior is measurable and testable and these geometric properties have significant implications, which are not imaginary, but quite real. I believe space-time in the mini AND the macro is structured because of times geometric properties and the multidimensional form of time within the expansion function of our cosmos.
We all wake, eat, got to work, sleep based on points along a time vector of our own choosing. Mankind uses Cesium clocks to measure and count vector segments of time. Most of the world is synchronized to a central time keeping source, which uses these clocks.
We use linear time as a measuring tool, measuring observations and travel.
After studying expansion in all its forms, I believe mankind has evolved within three dimensional time observing distance. Within this domain we measure linear time using motion, yet time exists in all directions, 3 dimensionally. We can observe motion in all directions, this is normal, but time being 3 dimensional? How can it not be?

[dleviwing]

Q7;
Knowing the fundamental functioning process of the universe does not mean you have the faculties to know everything in a detailed manner. It does however, allow one to know what is physically feasible and what is just someone’s brain fart like dark matter, dark energy, singularities, black holes, and hyper space. Personally, I believe there is too much intellectual brain farting in science today and not enough true realist thinkers. If you wish to keep following paths of worthless knowledge, it is your right. I seek truth and have learned to recognize the false paths of intellectual deceit, ignorance, and manipulation. It is quite likely however that you will be happy on your chosen path.

Stephen’s math is much better than mine; I don’t think his comprehension of reality is though. He can keep his job, it doesn’t pay enough.

[mkirkpatrick]

Thank you Quanta07 for your thoughtful remarks.I feel there is a very good
reason why this thread is the largest andmost posted on this forum,we are in
it time,we evolve through it and within it,we are all totally immersed in it?
As a fish may say in the ocean,"where is the water"?Time is that "thing" that
fills all space this side of the creational wave?


kind regards michael.

[quanta07]

Thank you for your kind response....

Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick ......we are in it, time,we evolve through it and within it,we are all totally immersed in it? As a fish may say in the ocean,"where is the water"? Time is that "thing" that fills all space this side of the creational wave?

Incredibly incitefull views Micheal. You understand this don't you?
Because this is a subforum on 'time' within a forum on 'time travel', I felt that without an understanding of the behavior/properties of linear time itself, as a vector, posting about 'time travel' theory must come later. But maybe not....Are you interested in the possibility?
I believe that actually traveling in time, like in the movies, carries with it serious problems.
Lets say for a moment we know how it could be done. Please consider this…
The spin axis, for all objects in the quantum level of mass, is oriented in time, at angles which change along a ‘master’ time line. ‘Time travel’ (like in the movies) may be considered as the act of disconnecting from a point within a time line, and connecting to another point, far away on a time line.
First, there is no guarantee you will connect to the same line in past or future. Second, ENTROPY, suddenly the spin axis are not initially oriented to the new position on a time line, and if they change to become oriented, Entropy may increase, and this is not a good thing within the human body.
I beleive that Entropy and destination are unknown factors that must be determined by experimentation.
The goal is to manipultate your position on the same time line and live.
From the many discussions with my colleagues, we believe there may be a way, and Dr. Mallett is correct......Q7

[quanta07]

Knowing the fundamental functioning process of the universe does not mean you have the faculties to know everything in a detailed manner. It does however, allow one to know what is physically feasible and what is just someone’s brain fart like dark matter, dark energy, singularities, black holes, and hyper space. Personally, I believe there is too much intellectual brain farting in science today and not enough true realist thinkers. If you wish to keep following paths of worthless knowledge, it is your right. I seek truth and have learned to recognize the false paths of intellectual deceit, ignorance, and manipulation. It is quite likely however that you will be happy on your chosen path.

Apparently you contribute nothing to the forum topic, currently ‘time’ and the possibility of time travel. I am just asking you to think about time, a subject that is in this forum, a time travel forum that you moderate. Why do you moderate a forum on a subject you do not believe in?
I believe…..If you do not contribute to the solution, then you are part of the problem.
I believe in this GOAL…..

ToeQuest maintains a community of like-minded researchers dedicated to a common goal: to explore, understand and contribute in the quest for the Theory of Everything

I maintain that ‘time’ is a valid subject in this quest and in this forum.
Dave, the posting of passive aggressive emotional attacks, attempting premeditated character assassination does nothing to further this goal, and frankly is quite boring. This is not a political race, smut campaign, avoiding the issues, and attacking on a personal platform. I respectfully request that you to please refrain from these types of post.

http://www.toequest.com/about.php

The issue is ‘time’ and the potential for actual ‘time travel’……….Q7

[mkirkpatrick]

Originally Posted by quanta07 Thank you for your kind response.... Incredibly incitefull views Micheal. You understand this don't you? Because this is a subforum on 'time' within a forum on 'time travel', I felt that without an understanding of the behavior/properties of linear time itself, as a vector, posting about 'time travel' theory must come later. But maybe not....Are you interested in the possibility? I believe that actually traveling in time, like in the movies, carries with it serious problems. Lets say for a moment we know how it could be done. Please consider this… The spin axis, for all objects in the quantum level of mass, is oriented in time, at angles which change along a ‘master’ time line. ‘Time travel’ (like in the movies) may be considered as the act of disconnecting from a point within a time line, and connecting to another point, far away on a time line. First, there is no guarantee you will connect to the same line in past or future. Second, ENTROPY, suddenly the spin axis are not initially oriented to the new position on a time line, and if they change to become oriented, Entropy may increase, and this is not a good thing within the human body. I beleive that Entropy and destination are unknown factors that must be determined by experimentation. The goal is to manipultate your position on the same time line and live. From the many discussions with my colleagues, we believe there may be a way, and Dr. Mallett is correct......Q7

Thanks again Q7,yes I would be interested.Let me know as and when,time
is within us and we know it not?
kind regards michael

[dleviwing]

Q7;
Very predictable; an attempt to stifle by accusations of poor character. Actually I’ve been told that it is my lack of emotions that’s my character flaw.

Let me know when you realize the meaning of time and we can go on to your next science lesson.

[mkirkpatrick]

We are fascinated by time?why?There is a reason,that explains why this is the biggest and most subscibed to thread,that reason is locked within our
very being!We are in fact,"time in-formers"we evolve and that process is
really what "time" is!The outworking of intention displayed as evolution.

kind regards michael.

[quanta07]

Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick I would be interested.Let me know .....when,

Hi Micheal,
How about right now, no time like the present? How about ALL of it in one post?
Here it is.........


Everyone has their own idea of time. For some people, pondering time itself is considered too complex to comprehend and a waste of time. Others dismiss it as a unit of measure, casting it as a scalar. Some fail to observe that ‘Time’ has an observable behavior. The behavior is that of a vector. Geometrically, vector properties of magnitude and direction generate geometric structure (line, plane, and volume). Since ‘Time’ has geometric vector properties, its behavior can be represented geometrically.
Mathematically examining the function of expansion, exposes time as geometric series within nature itself.
These two conditions make it possible to discuss time itself, geometrically as a line, plane, or volume.
The expansion of our cosmos is a time based function of not just linear time, but multidimensional time.
Evolving within a domain of expansion, we ponder the wonders of spacetime. Our view of spacetime is from our evolutionary domain, one of Euclidean orientation. Our domain is 3 dimensional within this expansion function and is expressed mathematically as (D/6)*(t^3). Each of 3 axis of time contains distance. We view Distance in 6 directions, immersed in a volume of time, all of which is connected at a unique moving point, on a ‘master’ time line. We could say this unique point IS our reality, a volume of time, locked on a time line. To move this volume of time which contains our reality, we need to effect the behavior of our ‘master’ time vector. To effect vector behavior, we need another vector, a source for another timeline.

After many experiments concerning the nature of light, we find it has a duality of behavior. Depending on the experimental setup, our results show light behaves as a particle AND light behaves as waves.
We believe light itself is a domain of expansion, expressed mathematically within the function as (V/24)*(t^4). It is a 4 dimensional domain of expansion, expansion as a function of velocity. An element from this domain, observed within our domain, will exhibit the behavior of light.
In other words, from this view, a photon of light is a 4 dimensional time object, each of 4 axis of time contain velocity.
Creating a static photon(4d time) about us, within our domain(3d time), may provide us with access to another time line provided by the photon itself. If so, the presence of this ‘extra’ time line from the static photon will effect our point position on the ‘master’ time line of the environment within the photon.

We believe it is possible to create this static photon, in a controlled environment Controlling its intensity and spin, we believe that being in the interior of this created photon effects our position in linear time.
We speculate direction, moving to the past or future, is controlled by photon spin. We also speculate that destination point in time is controlled by amount of energy used in the creation of the photon.
Right now, ‘time travel’ (like in the movies) is mostly theory and speculation.
This theory for time travel is evolved from and based in the mathematics of cosmic expansion.
http://www.toequest.com/forum/mathematics-articles/427-pure-mathematics-space-time.html?garpg=2
The mathematics of expansion are valid, but this ‘time travel’ concept remains theory until testing and experimentation is performed.
I believe that the 1943 Philadelphia experiment was an accident, which resulted in the first documented occurence of time travel. I do not believe I am alone in this belief.
I use the word ‘we’ in presenting this material, because it is not my theory. I just happen to agree with others and feel it is worthy of a mention in a forum concerning with ‘time’ and ‘time travel’.
Time will tell.............Happy thoughts…………Q7

[mkirkpatrick]

Many thanks Q7 I will be reading carefully through this and will get back to you,is there anything I can do in the meantime,let me know if there is.
regards michael.