[quanta07]

Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick Many thanks Q7 I will be reading carefully through this and will get back to you,is there anything I can do in the meantime,let me know if there is. regards michael.

Thank you Michael, for giving me chance to share and discuss this information in this forum.........Q7

[mkirkpatrick]

Q7 have read through you post, very interesting, I have also refreshed my memory with regard the Philadelphia experiment, and the other name Project Rainbow, I remember reading about this more that 30 years ago, and I was eager to understand more then, I am still very much interested in it today, there seems to have been so much denial and coverups,what really did happen for sure? I would really like to know! Let me know Q7 if I can assist in any way, in your noble endevour.

kind regards michael.

[quanta07]

Hi Michael,

Continuing to view time, in terms of behavioral properties,(vector), within the function of expansion displayed mathematically here….
=Vol(t)+SA(t^2)/2+D(t^3)/6+V(t^4)/24+A(t^5)/120+I(t^6)720+......
from the document..... http://www.toequest.com/forum/mathem...e.html?garpg=2
We can see ‘types’ of time vectors. All types of time vectors are within the function. This equation is the union of all types of expansion, expansion as a function of volume, surface area, distance, velocity, etc. A union of ‘Time vectors of spatial properties’, but within our cosmos of expansion, there is one vector type that is linear, the time vector of volume. The distance domain of this function, 3 time vectors of distance, is in union with all other domains, locked to a point in the one time vector of volume, considered the ‘master’ linear time.
Observe vector behavior by throwing a small stone off a cliff. This event introduces a ‘time vector of velocity’ within a field of ‘time vectors of acceleration’. The ‘time vector of velocity’ will change direction and orient itself in the same direction as the field of ‘time vectors of acceleration’. This is a ‘time vector’ view of a simple effect, when a velocity vector orients to the gravitational field direction.
Time does behave like vectors, these vectors have spatial properties AND they orient themselves to the current field direction.
Some times, what you do not know, will hurt you. ‘Encasing’ a photon, may cause the four ‘time vectors of velocity’ to orient with the 3 ‘time vectors of distance’ AND linear time, the 1 ‘time vector of volume’.
The experiments in 1943, field encapsulated a volume, which contained a ship and crew, resulting in ‘time vector’ alignment. I believe we had no idea of the concepts of time vectors of spatial properties in 1943. The design of the experiment was concerned with the exterior of the field, with uncertainty about effects within the interior of the field.
Classified material usually becomes declassified after 20 years. I believe some information about the experiment type and placement of devices is still classified. Declassification of some information did not occur after the normal 20 years, it appears after most or all eyewitnesses are dead 35 to 40 years later.
The facts are….there was an event….tragedy occurred….facts suppressed….
Anything more remains speculation, no witnesses, and only second hand information.
IMHO, it is the orientation of vectors of time, which generate and maintain structure within nature. In 1943, expansion of the cosmos was considered unacceptable in conception and ‘time’ was still considered a scalar, irrational and purely subjective.
Maybe ‘Times’ have changed……..Q7

[dleviwing]

Michael;
This site will provide a better view of reality of the so called “Philadelphia Experiment”.
http://www.history.navy.mil/faqs/faq21-1.htm
I do not believe that ToeQuest should be turned into another site for the propagation of conspiracy theories. Q7’s condition cannot be helped by playing into his fantasies. I have known someone with the same condition for many years and though he is harmless to himself and others, he does cause embarrassment at times.

[mkirkpatrick]

Thanks Q7.I have looked up several reports on the Phil-exper-I suppose I would like to think it was really real, but there are so many conflicting accounts, just who is correct? I have not although closed the door to the possibilty of it actually occuring.
kind regards michael.

[mkirkpatrick]

Many thanks Dave for the website,i have had a look at it, and itappears to be kosher, however, these things seem to stick in the mind, "just maybe it did" I do not want to play into anyones fantasies Dave, but Q7, is entitled to his views, even if you disagree with them. I am not totally convinced that the experiment happened, but I will keep an open mind-It could Have!
kind regards michael.

[quanta07]

Originally Posted by dleviwing Q7’s condition cannot be helped by playing into his fantasies. I have known someone with the same condition for many years and though he is harmless to himself and others, he does cause embarrassment at times.

This and your previous posts constitute defamation of character with malice. You are one judgemental, emotionally twisted individual, with no respect for anyone or thing. Your behavior and tone degrades no one but yourself. and this site. Maybe this site is all you have in your little world and you feel safe making this type of post, you're not. This is just another 'smut' post from Dave. par for the course.....
You don't care about this site, you drive people away from TOEquest, Dave.
The theories of time and time travel are posted now. No thanks to you...

[dleviwing]

Q7;
For “defamation of character” the comments would need to be false - They are not. You are presenting false information in your posts as being reference for truth. To you I am the “Ogre Under the Bridge”; to others, I am the Dr. Phil of ToeQuest; I am neither, I tell it like it is and do not tolerate obvious presentations of lies and deceptions. Most members are willing to allow your posts to slide and some may even believe you know what you are talking about. Stick to real facts or even personal opinions, but don’t present BS as fact.

[quanta07]

There is no BS posted here...Your comments show purposeful intent. I present no false information, just theory and mathematics as the basis of the theory.
Though it is obvious that you can not comprehend, it does not imply others will not. I have presented the current theories of 'time' and the potential for 'time travel', as known by others in the scientific community. You demonstrate your inability to moderator or even discuss issues in this forum.
You are being held responsible for your personnal comments. Now and in future...
What I have posted about the role of time is true....
If you choose not to accept this information, fine, I do not care...
'The real facts'.....Your behavior has stopped the sharing of information, FREE information, from knowledgable sources, here on TOEquest. Not just now, but in the past as well, you have driven people away with your personal attacks.
I am responsible for the information I post in this forum....information on expansion and time. It is a math based theory.

[EventHypothesis2006]

Time does exist. Space does exist. They are both aspects of general zone of energy
within which our universe exists.

Go to ------------- for more information. (spam link removed)
Event Hypothesis Quickie Summary:

The nature of time and space has been of much intrigue to great philosophers over many centuries. Today no one still seems to know exactly what it is , though some has had their suspicions . This thesis seeks to help to explain what it is by building upon our present knowledge, without much speculations. True, you might find some of this thesis a bit radical, but I do not think there are any logical inconsistencies.
To date the thesis of Einstein showed that there is a relationship between mass and energy.This is not an extension to the Special or General Theory of Relativity , but rather I say such theories helped pave the way to this hypothesis. I propose to show by an elementary analysis in this thesis that there also is a relationship between Space, Time and Energy , and that Space and Time are both aspects of the same thing That is , Space and Time are both manifestations of Energy!!The suspicion that there was a relationship between Space and Time is not a new one. I think there are many misconceptions about what a space time graph really represents. However,the postulate that both space and time are manifestations of energy is what is new !It is my postulate that a notion of space as a measurement of a void of nothing is inconsistent . A notion of time only as the period of duration of the Earth spinning on its axis and around the Sun is outdated.
My hypothesis proposes in its broad sense that the universe is in a zone of energy and that we experience space and time according to the rate this energy is distributed to us. In Physics , Power is the term that we use for the rate of distribution of energy. In essence in this elementary analysis, Time is the term we use to describe our feeling of duration , of the distribution of this energy to us according to power when we are not moving. On the other hand Space is the term we use to describe our feeling of duration of the distribution of energy according to power when we are moving. The main difference between space and time in this zone of energy then is motion !

Given that S= Space (length)
t = Time (duration in Seconds)
V = Velocity ( Velocity in meters per second)
Space and Time are joined by the simple relationship:

S = Vt
Given that an event occurs and that there was a change in energy signifying that the event did occur, we can call this change in energy E

If we let Kp be the inverse power constant for that event then:
Units of Kp are Watts –1 or Joules –1 and so on

It can be shown that the experienced time duration of that event can be expressed according to the formula
t= KpE
This shows we experience time as a direct relationship according to energy distributed to us from the energy of the event according to its power.. In this relationship, the time of our duration is a definite quantity and of a definite duration dependent only on the quantity of energy change or energy used . Similarly,if we were moving in space for this period of time, the quantity of space propagated would be of a definite quantity ,according to the quantity of energy used. I think this is reasonable and it is within the daily experience of everyone!! Also the more work that is needed to be done, the more energy is needed. When that energy is done if you need to do some more work then you need to get more energy to do it.

BUT more generally
t = KpT
where T is the term used to describe a general zone of energy in which our universe exists :
The Limits of T have not been defined in this thesis , but this formular then proposes that if we should have a CONTINEOUS zone of energy infinite in extent, then the duration, t of that event would similarly be infinite !!

This embodies the notion of Newton’s first Law of Motion … which stipulates that a body will continue at rest or uniform motion in a straight line unless acted upon by a force.
By making this new Hypothesis, the notion of inertia is explained. That is , the tendency of a body to continue moving once its initial energy has run out is explained in this hypothesis , by the postulate which proposes that it is being fed energy from a universal source termed T, STENERGY . .. Short for Space Time Energy , (Ok.. Ok .. I proposed another names as in TAM … short for “Time dam” and then as the postulate progressed I thought of STAM as in “Space , Time, dam” and could also serve to imply a shortened version of STAMINER implying the energy factor)
The relationship
S = Vt
can now be more accurately be replaced by :
S = V KpT
Similarly by this proposition a body once in motion will also describe space indefinitely according to the source of energy T, ie STENERGY, though according to its original power, which determined V.
The elementary analysis then proposes that the relationship
Vt = S ie VKpT = S
has a deeper meaning : It is a statement of the principle of conservation of energy , in a conversion of “Time Energy” (Energy in Time as experienced through our sences as “ duration time” in seconds, minutes etc) into “ Space Energy” (Energy in Space the conversion of which is evidenced in terms of distance traveled , volume and so on) fuelled by T ( STENERGY), at a given power dependent upon what there was before the original energy ended . A likely consequence of such reasoning then proposes that space then is not just a void of emptiness but a representation of this converted energy,
from STENERGY. It was elementary to show that STENERGY supports velocity, mass ,acceleration, forces, etc.
Given that the representation is correct, for any particular zone of T , in that particular zone our awareness of Space and Time are not absolute but may be subject to changes by the influence of other energy sources which can generate power. Hereby the Hypothesis also proposes the possibility that fields of influence such as magnetic Fields, Electric Fields, Gravitational Fields if they generate power could affect both our awareness of Time and or Space.
Based on the analysis I was able to come to a bold new and more meaningful definition of Time as:

“Nevertheless it is possible to come to a unified definition of time based on the concept of power.For example :
we could now define time as the name given to a natural energy, which fuels constant motion,(This natural energy also accommodates velocity, forces, acceleration etc.) and of which we perceive as a feeling of duration, of one second , at a power of one watt, (in a given frame of reference ) for a change in energy of one Newton meter. “

For example if we were in this field of energy generating power to us at a rate of 1 watt and we ourselves had energy and we were able to change our energy from say 200 Joules of energy to say 201 Joules of energy then we would experience the notion of duration of what we call a time of 1 second , in that given plane of reference.

Similarly another definition for Space within the context of S = v t

Another way of defining space could be as follows:

The name given to a natural energy which fuels constant motion.( This Energy and also accommodates acceleration, force, ect) and of which we perceive as a the feeling of space duration of One Meter for a unit change in velocitized energy , at a power of one watt .(In a given frame of reference )

Put another way we are saying that if we were in a field of energy that was generating
its power to us at a rate of 1 watt, and we ourselves had energy and we were moving at a constant velocity and we were able to change our energy from one state to another by a value , such that the product of the change in energy and the constant velocity is equal to unity, then we would experience the notion of “ space duration “ which we call 1 meter, in that frame of reference.

Again to the technically astute we see that the difference between what we perceive as 1 second as against 1 meter is a matter of whether we are speaking about Energy Change in a field of energy generating power or Velocitized Energy Change in this same field of energy generating this same power!! Technically speaking also, since it has already be hypothesized that all things are in constant motion , the question could arise as to whether on not when we attempt to define time, do we not also have velocitized energy ? If this is so , then what is the difference between Time and Space ?
(Velocitized energy was used to convey the idea of movement , which creates separation, implying the creation of space, but philosophically, the fundamentals behind space are energy , change and power)


C Copyright 2006 – 2007 Event Hyothesis 2006 . Intellectual property. No part(s) reproduced or distributed without prior distinct permission of the author