travel in time is just a myth?

skaper · **travel in time is just a myth? -** 04-23-2006, 03:43 PM

hi
many theories says:" traveling faster than the speed of ligth means tha we will travel backwards on the time line according to the theory of relativity" but as is said traveling very fast the biological work on tha body will slow down and we will get older slower than athers who do not travel at that speed. that should mean: traveling faster than te speed of ligth our bodys will become younger and everythig will go reverse on time that sould mean going back on the time of begining the motion so you will be prisoned at that moment. isn't that logical?

dleviwing · 04-23-2006, 03:59 PM

You have either been reading my posts or you have realize the solution to combining Relativity and QM all by yourself. Congratulations in either case.

skaper · 04-23-2006, 04:05 PM

but what will happen if is true that traveling in a warmhole has as a result the andless speed due to the immediate trasport to an other part of space? should mean the endless travel to the past? and that is before everything

Guille · 04-23-2006, 04:08 PM

Skaper,

I thought of it once but no. You mention that if we move fast towards the speed of light, we will see how other's bodies get older but ours doesn't, that is true, but jsut the same, if we go over the speed of light and start moving backwards in time (if at all this is possible) it will be the same, that is, others will get younger, but not us (jsut as we don't get older towards the speed of light).

dleviwing · 04-23-2006, 04:12 PM

Slowing the molecular interactive motions will only provide the illusion that when you return to normal motions, that you have moved to the future (and you have). Moving faster than light may get you out to a point that you can observe the past just as we do now when we look out into space. Entering a black hole or worm hole will KILL you in no time at all.

skaper · 04-23-2006, 04:21 PM

when i said traveling into a black hole, i was talking theoritically. BTW guille why is that? you see treveling back in time like a tape filming reverse but i see it like me going reverse in time with out realising it of course is just that others should still grow older faster than me just that time will in a more faster way than traveling at the speed of light.

mkirkpatrick · 05:14 PM

We all travel, in evolution,is that the same as time? How far can now reach in any direction? Well the answer to that would depend on your expanse of consciousness and your distance into the evolutionary cycle? The farther in the "wider" now would become!!

kind regards michael.

pagan3142 · **Doe's London Stop At this Train ??? -** 04-23-2006, 08:47 PM

Doe's London Stop At this Train ???
Einstein said something similar. But if you live in the NOW it cannot matter how fast you are going.
Time is not a constant in this universe, so it should be possible to go backwards and forwards along the Time-line. I think that we have not yet discovered a fundemental "quantity" for time at our present "NOW" on the evolutionary ladder. There is a "NOW" in our timeline when it may be possible.
On the other hand, Why has no one come back to this time to tell us how ??

Maybe another Paradox ????????????????

skaper · 05:14 PM

dear pagan3142
How can this be possible? if someone in the future manages to travel in time with out him prisoner in the moment every biological procedure in him will travel reverse. He will become younger and if he travel in a moment before his birth he will disappear.

rezaahmed · 04-24-2006, 04:07 AM

So, you all agree that time has a vectoral characteristics and close relation with the speed of light?