reality of motion

[Guille]

I was thinking about the begining theme of this, and I thought that maybe we are doing the exact wrong thing by saying time depends on motion, and exists because of motion. maybe it is the athor way round, although for a human mind it doesn't seem familiar or normal, but nature doesn't always act like us, I mean of course, that maybe motion depend on time, and it exists because of time, don't you think so? and also, amybe none of them is fundamental.

[AntonioLao]

maybe motion depend on time, and it exists because of time, don't you think so? and also, amybe none of them is fundamental.

I think time depends on the change of infinitesimal directions. According to the principle of directional invariance, there should be 8 directional properties. If an object has all these 8 properties, then it is physically real. But directional properties also go into layers and levels giving different levels of existence. The maximum dimension for each level is 3. And the cycle repeat 1-2-3, 1-2-3, 1-2-3, etc. and between 3s and 1s there are the zeros dimension levels.

[Guille]

when did your last post ended being a fact and begun being your theories and thoughts?

[AntonioLao]

when did your last post ended being a fact and begun being your theories and thoughts?

any discussion beyond the 4th dimension of 3-space and 1-time is purely conjecture, which cannot be demonstrated by experiments with the required energy domain.