Time does exist.

[sillysally]

[QUOTE=MJA;98931]

>.<

There is no possible way to define a Universal sense of simultaneity, which means you can not have a single Universal Now shared between all observers.

quote]

I beg to differ; = unites us all. TOE

=
MJA

Think about this, what steve just said a couple posts ago. No 2 people have the same memory of the same thing happening in front of them. Even if we watched a video from the same angle, we will both relay it differently.

BTW, that was a good point Steve.

[MJA]

[quote=sillysally;98941]

Think about this, what steve just said a couple posts ago. No 2 people have the same memory of the same thing happening in front of them. Even if we watched a video from the same angle, we will both relay it differently.

BTW, that was a good point Steve.

Unless you see all equally or universally the same.
We may have different views, but the view is truly singularly or equally UNIversal to me. UNI = ONE.

=
MJA

[sillysally]

[QUOTE=MJA;98944]

Unless you see all equally or universally the same.
We may have different views, but the view is truly singularly or equally UNIversal to me. UNI = ONE.

=
MJA

Yeah, that reminds me.

I was driving down the road the other day and I felt every bump the car drove over. I believe in predestination and those bumps were all predetermined. It's no wonder god doesn't save all souls, that's a lot of bumps to plan ahead of time.

[MJA]

[quote=sillysally;98949]

Yeah, that reminds me.

I was driving down the road the other day and I felt every bump the car drove over. I believe in predestination and those bumps were all predetermined. It's no wonder god doesn't save all souls, that's a lot of bumps to plan ahead of time.

Perhaps you should find a better Way to go.

=
MJA

[sillysally]

Nah, I won't phuck with destiny. I was supposed to feel those bumps.

[SteveA]

[quote=sillysally;98941]

Think about this, what steve just said a couple posts ago. No 2 people have the same memory of the same thing happening in front of them. Even if we watched a video from the same angle, we will both relay it differently.

BTW, that was a good point Steve.

Thanks. Yes, we wouldn't have anything to talk about otherwise

"Isn't that same thing still great?"

"Sure, is. Hey look at it again"

"Yes, still the same ..."

"Hey then why are the sentences different?"

Now of course in another sense, none of the sentences occured or were interpreted anywhere outside a single mind, but I don't think you can actually say that all the information came from the same thing without that thing being something beyond comprehension ... so yes, everything is united at ones own point of awareness/experience etc. but that never really contains it all. It just contains things up to the present.

Those unknowns are change/time, but the "knowns" extend pretty far already, what those knowns can become is a space of probability that reaches the limit of the imagination, what lies beyond that might even be considered subconscious, but infinity goes way past any and all of that and there's always a turn in the road that you couldn't have imagined before you came to it. (But how else should things have been ... no, I think if you actually had to put together something close to ideal, we're sitting in the middle of it. The "problem" appears to be learning how that's the case and the second "problem" is not really a problem at all it's planning out a long trip and some of the sights to stop by along the way. I think we've reached the starting line ... and as you pointed out the shocks and suspension need some work. We can always add bumps in the road again later

[MJA]

Time dissipates to shining either the solid angularity of facts. Emerson

Time as measure disolves like the sands of an hour-glass,
and as the grains of measures tick away, the truth becomes clear and all that remains.

=
MJA