| | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,274
Thanks Given: 714
Thanked 121x in 119 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 73 | time infinities separated by contact -
07-23-2005, 03:06 PM
Mathematically speaking, the physical act of kissing is defined as an equivalence relation called ‘contact’ of order k of functions corresponding to having the same value at a point P and also the same derivatives up to order k. Generally speaking, these equivalence classes are called jets. Physically speaking, the osculation of time past and time future is the now, the tangent point. Geometrically speaking, what is the shape and form of this tangent point, the now? How could this tangent point of time be applied to people of the past or people of the future? If the tangent point or contact surface is a finite sphere of given radius then the infinite past is found inside and the infinite future is found outside. | |
| | | | | | The Thinker
Status: Offline Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005 Rep Power: 47 |
07-29-2005, 09:44 AM
By this tangent point, it must mean the point of time we are in, so, time, itself, not our measurement, but it self, must be made by particles for this. Then, we should think, is time geometrical? I can't answer this. | |
| | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,274
Thanks Given: 714
Thanked 121x in 119 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 73 |
08-06-2005, 06:11 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by GUILLE is time geometrical? | time is a topological entity. By this I mean it has a dynamic geometry, a constantly changing geometry. It might be a circle today, a square tomorrow, a triangle next week, and a rectangle by the end of the month. | |
| | | | | | The Thinker
Status: Offline Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005 Rep Power: 47 |
08-06-2005, 06:32 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by AntonioLao time is a topological entity. By this I mean it has a dynamic geometry, a constantly changing geometry. It might be a circle today, a square tomorrow, a triangle next week, and a rectangle by the end of the month. | ok, but if you see, there is an error in your writing, because it leads to my time paradox: you stated that time can change in time, which would impply time to have time, which hasn't been prooven, I'm still trying to proof that time doesn't hgave time, so that both proofs of mine lead to a complete paradox. | |
| | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,274
Thanks Given: 714
Thanked 121x in 119 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 73 |
08-06-2005, 06:43 PM
GUILLE,
the magnitude of time stays the same but its direction changes. At 45 degrees you live forever, at 0 degree you are dead. | |
| | | | | | The Thinker
Status: Offline Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005 Rep Power: 47 |
08-06-2005, 07:41 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by AntonioLao GUILLE,
the magnitude of time stays the same but its direction changes. At 45 degrees you live forever, at 0 degree you are dead. | I thionk I quite don't understand this axis theory of yours. Do you mean that time is bidimensional, and thus, there are 360º degrees that you can be of time? | |
| | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,274
Thanks Given: 714
Thanked 121x in 119 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 73 |
08-07-2005, 02:43 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by GUILLE there are 360º degrees that you can be of time? | Based the geometry of the lightcone, the maximum attainable angle for our time axes is 45 degrees. At 45 degrees, past, present, and future of time merged together and we become light itself. | |
| | | | | | The Thinker
Status: Offline Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005 Rep Power: 47 |
08-07-2005, 04:14 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by AntonioLao Based the geometry of the lightcone, the maximum attainable angle for our time axes is 45 degrees. At 45 degrees, past, present, and future of time merged together and we become light itself. | interesting, interesting...
Now, do yout hink that there is a way that we can become light, I mean, isn't it only possible if we acheive light speed? and, then, if the only way to become light is by going ot the speed of light, then, shoudln'¡t we go backwards in time (if we go faster than light speed)? but, this wouldn't make, because you say that if we are light, then past present and future are the same. Explain this contradiction please. | |
| | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,274
Thanks Given: 714
Thanked 121x in 119 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 73 |
08-08-2005, 07:07 PM
GUILLE,
I think there are two possibilites for us to become light. One by reaching light speed and the other by increasing the matter frequency. At the surface of the lightcone or lightlike region of spacetime, past, present, and future merged into one and time loses its direction. Time stopped. Since there are infinite directions for time to choose from time decided not to choose any and stopped moving. | |
| | | | | | Moderator
Status: Offline Posts: 7,316
Thanks Given: 347
Thanked 687x in 645 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005 Rep Power: 94 | Self-conscious contact separates time Infinities. -
10-15-2005, 06:58 PM
All exists within the consciousness of the one mind,what apparently causes any
contact is mind,in effect mindful awareness,this self-conscious looking at phenomena,changes it!many names all eventually run back to one,and that is
thought,thought made manifest in energy and solidified into matter.We use many
name to prehaps bring out a finer shade of meaning to an idea that we are trying to express,we talk of,energy,force,light,time,space,quantum fields,black-holes,we construct complex mathamatical formulas,to try and explain the way it seems to be,but trace all these words back,and whats left is consciousness,mindful intention made manifest!what lies at the back of a complex maths-formula-mind-thought.what lies at the back of reality-formula ie;
the universe-mindful-intention-thought.The understanding of time-universe is
really simple,a child could and sometimes does understand it,as they Say-Its All
In-The-Mind?
kind regards michael. | |
| | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com | |