+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 17 of 17

Thread: Introduction to the "Unified Mind Theory"

  1. #11
    Yellow Belt Hans J Zeunert is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    10
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Introduction to the "Unified Mind Theory"

    I am delighted to be remembered by the old TOE gang. However, it is no pleasure to discuss serious matter with people who are either stoned or pissed or both together. I am just an ordinary guy, an engineer by training, trying to make sense out of this world by assuming God exists since nothing else appears to work, or satisfies the intellect. Here we introduce "Mind" as the background to all there is even prior to big bang, never changing, and that the concept of "Oneness of all Life" needs an engineer to put all the pieces back together. This is not preaching, or harping on Jesus. Sure I had my experiences, and run ins with Him after I had accepted Him to enter my life and to guide me. This was not a big deal for me at the time because like Nickola, I did not believe in that kind of crap. I only did it for my wife who had her own ideas about family life.

    Do I have a problem? All I am doing is give here and there some advise because of the search and study I have done, and my wish that others may have it easier is just trying to be helpful. Perhaps I shouldn't do that either. But to discuss the theory of Creation, meaning everything there is, becomes meaningless without the introduction of "Life" to complete the equation, and here we say (my inner buddy and I): "Life is one!"; and, while we assume God exists: "Halelujah Amen! Here is His Son." Just as simple as that; and it does not take much brains to understand that. The only problem is to realize that we are parts of Him or in Him, and that people cannot "handle this" and freak out on the idea. Well, here I come and say let's get some mathematicians together and study field theory and find out where each of us is, just for fun and to get a hang of it, and then we look at shared perception and we realize Spirit moving everywhere in our complex field of relative and personal time. For this we need a 5-dimensional co-ordinate system which model I have described and presented in a graphical form, showing our physical and spiritual environments as spacetime and Consciousness in black on white on 2-D paper. This is rather technical and challenging. Sorry, Nickola, for having given you the impression I am brainwashing you, or society at large, and you may have felt having been called to save the world from bull shitters or crack pots like me. This is totally cool. Nice thought. But all of us who come to this forum, including you and I, want to know the Truth and work on it together, and to find answers - on which we all can agree upon - to fundamental questions which satisfy the intellect, and help us to grow in Spirit. Sorry if that sounds like religion again.

    I have expressed myself as to how I feel and who I am and what I think in my folder "For Friends Only" on my homepage www.silk.net/personal/hzeunert which I have kept up-to-date, like a monthly diary. I suggest anybody responding to this thread wishing to discuss with me the UMT should first read all the 24 pages of my testimony, particularly on the motions and dynamics of the universe and how they dominate our lives, from the first page to the last one and then back again. Now we can communicate and know what we are talking about. Ask me anything you want to know, in good faith, or anything you have not so far understood. Page me21 is an excellent starting point to come straight to the core of the theory, and to lead you into the mystery of special and general recessional velocity. Good luck on your spiritual venture.

    Hans

  2. #12
    Moderator Graybeard has much to be proud of Graybeard has much to be proud of Graybeard has much to be proud of Graybeard has much to be proud of Graybeard has much to be proud of Graybeard has much to be proud of Graybeard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    3,173
    Blog Entries
    24
    Thanks Given
    1,021
    Thanked 1,061x in 594 Posts
    Rep Power
    66

    Re: Introduction to the "Unified Mind Theory"

    Quote Originally Posted by Hans J Zeunert View Post
    However, it is no pleasure to discuss serious matter with people who are either stoned or pissed or both together.
    I see no reason so far for this assumption ??

    Graybeard (mod)
    'Blondie says I must hate all Brunettes. I'll try, but if I can't ... I'll love them both'
    ... graffiti on Tavern wall, Pompeii, circa AD 70.

  3. #13
    Grandmaster austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    8,274
    Blog Entries
    28
    Thanks Given
    878
    Thanked 1,774x in 1,173 Posts
    Rep Power
    135

    Awards Showcase

    Re: Introduction to the "Unified Mind Theory"

    The physics about the plus and minus split is fine, as all of the conserved energies sum to zero or at least as close as a small fluctuation, and this is even my theory as well, but I don't use the Total Nothing idea, as that would have no properties and would not even be 'there' in a 'where' or in any way. We must remember that there was a capability for the plus/minus split and that is not nothing.

    The other assumptions and pronouncements about God are 'just saying' and so they carry no weight. There are other ways.

    A ground-state/capability exists as the normal state of affairs of there being 'something', because Nothing couldn't be. We don't even know if a total lack of anything is even possible, but it if were then this would still be the case, and it isn't. So, don't worry about making anything from Nothing, for nothing becomes of nothing. What is the ultimate and original—whatever its constitution or capability—has always been the uncaused and natural state. Besides, composite complexities always come later on—in the complete other direction than beneath and below. When one wishes too hard for the invisible imaginary, one just builds even more structures upon it and then gets grooved on it and wishes to protect the belief merely assumed in the first place, even saying 'is' and 'have' instead of 'maybe', a deception of proclaiming theory as truth and fact.

    So, who's stoned and all that? You did say 'assumed' about your beliefs, plus there really is no preaching of God and/or religion allowed here. It just needs more enforcement.

  4. #14
    Yellow Belt Hans J Zeunert is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    10
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Introduction to the "Unified Mind Theory"

    Quote Originally Posted by Graybeard View Post
    I see no reason so far for this assumption ??

    Graybeard (mod)
    Hi Fellows; I feel bad about being accused of preaching, and the preference I give to Christ or Jesus, and why not give credit to Mohammed or Buddha as well. Well, let's stay away from these historical figures as we may never agree, even though "Christ" is not a figure but a higher state, and the term "Jesus Christ" is an absurdity, if not a swear word, showing utter ignorance, but it is correct to say "Jesus who became the Christ" being the Spirit of Man which is one, inviting us to follow Him. There is nothing wrong with knowing this, but by arguing about it we are wasting our time. Let us rather look at what our model of a 5-dimensional universe leads us to insights about the dynamics of an ever revolving and continuously evolving universe, and how all these things work together within a never changing Mind. Now we look at big bang in a new way, and understand what Einstein could not see. Does this not give us a profound understanding, and peace of mind? Is nobody interested at all in what happens after we die? Isn't it amazing to discover that transcendence is the state which is not disturbed or interfered with by the body, live or dead, pointing to everlasting life we cannot escape, connecting us with the universe?

    I am sorry for my reaction regarding Nickola's presentation. We all are learning. Thank you, Graybeard, for keeping the standards of conduct and manners on this forum up to a high degree. Please accept my apology. I am normally not that rude.

    Hans

  5. #15
    Moderator Graybeard has much to be proud of Graybeard has much to be proud of Graybeard has much to be proud of Graybeard has much to be proud of Graybeard has much to be proud of Graybeard has much to be proud of Graybeard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    3,173
    Blog Entries
    24
    Thanks Given
    1,021
    Thanked 1,061x in 594 Posts
    Rep Power
    66

    Re: Introduction to the "Unified Mind Theory"

    No problem Hans .... and tolerance is something we can all do with a bit of .... lol

    Graybeard
    'Blondie says I must hate all Brunettes. I'll try, but if I can't ... I'll love them both'
    ... graffiti on Tavern wall, Pompeii, circa AD 70.

  6. #16
    Grandmaster austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    8,274
    Blog Entries
    28
    Thanks Given
    878
    Thanked 1,774x in 1,173 Posts
    Rep Power
    135

    Awards Showcase

    Re: Introduction to the "Unified Mind Theory"

    I use Lulu to publish, as well, but now I use createspace.com since they put the books on Amazon.

    Your exe file didn't work for me since I have mac, so I only only guess about the unified mind, which I only see as a possibility in the future. All below and beneath has been shown to become simpler and simpler. I wouldn't expect a system of mind just sitting there as the first stuff, for that is complex.

    Jesus and Buddha were human and brought forth good messages. Among religions such as Greek Orthodox and Judaism, the divinity of Jesus is not accepted. Either way, all would claim to have been there at the time.

    Want to post a summary of the 5-dimensions and all here?

  7. #17
    Grandmaster austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    8,274
    Blog Entries
    28
    Thanks Given
    878
    Thanked 1,774x in 1,173 Posts
    Rep Power
    135

    Awards Showcase

    Re: Introduction to the "Unified Mind Theory"

    Is nobody interested at all in what happens after we die?

    There is a ToeQuest thread named something like 'What Happens After We Die".


    — Abloom —

    At first, you sleep in your dear mother’s womb;
    At last, you sleep in the cold silent tomb.
    In between, Life whispers a dream that says
    “Wake, live, for the rose withers all too soon!”



    What Really Happens After We Die?

    We die ‘little deaths’ all the time.
    Our atoms change, some of our memories go away
    And some new ones reappear,
    Although I realize that it is the core of memories
    That defines us as us.

    It’s just that we are hardly the same person now
    As when we were much younger.
    We had ‘death’ before birth, too,
    And now there is life after birth.

    Is there life only during life?

    If one had amnesia and began learning the world anew,
    Then one might say that one as the previous person
    Was ‘dead’ and that it is our new life that counts,
    One not even missing the old one.

    And, while the ‘big death’ is much more
    Than any of these ‘little deaths’,
    It is that our atoms go on
    To reside in a new person eventually.

    It’s not like there is any continuity of memory,
    But more like that any narrative will do.

    As for really knowing all, that is, the TOE,
    Meaning that we know that we can’t know it all.
    This is a relief and so then we can go about our life
    With the ultimate freedom to be.



    Now and Zen

    Everything that is part of us—
    Our cells, tissues, organs and organ systems—
    Has come about over billions of years
    Because it proved successful in the great survival stakes
    During our perilous evolutionary descent with modification.

    The brain, being no exception, evolved, in part,
    To allow a creature to learn from what happens in its life,
    To retain key elements that could influence future actions.

    We are geared for self-preservation.
    We will do anything to avoid facing the possibility
    That who we are now cannot continue.

    We ourselves are mainly the cause that we are interested in.
    The self is preoccupied with staying alive,
    Which is why our species is still around today.

    It is a prime biological function to be afraid of death,
    And so the self, as thus contrived,
    Is able to fully play its crucial survival role.

    We want to equip our brain with a soul
    That offers us an escape when the brain dies
    Since the self cannot come to terms with its own extinction.

    From a subjective standpoint, we are all born equal
    And undifferentiated (before that, ‘we’ were dead),
    But as mature selves we make a distinction
    Between the individual and the surroundings.

    Still, the brain keeps changing throughout life,
    In a pattern of the shifting flux of its neurons.
    We gain and lose memories and feelings,
    Essentially creating a new person over and over again.

    The self is thus not so rock solid as it seems.
    These moment-to-moment changes differ from death
    Only in degree. In essence, they are identical,
    Although at the opposite ends of the spectrum.

    So, we are not static things.
    Other neural networks will come to be in other,
    Future people, albeit with an “amnesia”
    Of what went on before in the brains of the previous others.

    Why should we be happy about this?
    We never can be, because the ‘I’ cannot operate
    Outside of its own boundaries.
    The only viable alternative is to think of a way
    In which it is possible to ever continue on.

    What will it be like to be a part of someone else after we die,
    With our own particular narrative of life cast aside?
    This is the ‘zen’ of now and then and when.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts