Preliminary Algorithm For Finding The Theory of Everything

[gautam]

Michael , I have spent many years to find the ultimate answer in the scriptures. The study is very fruitful to give a dimensional shift to your thinking. But believe that they never had this kind of knowledge at their disposal to have better understanding of life and matter.
It is customary to say so then its fine.

[mkirkpatrick]

Michael , I have spent many years to find the ultimate answer in the scriptures. The study is very fruitful to give a dimensional shift to your thinking. But believe that they never had this kind of knowledge at their disposal to have better understanding of life and matter.
It is customary to say so then its fine.

I quite agree with you,gautam,They never had the "modern understanding"
of what we now call science,and physics,but then what use would it have been to them?I would consider (none whatsoever).Six thousand years ago
it was known "how" the universe came about,simply by the Will of the one,
about whom naught maybe said.The power of focussed Will,and awesome
intent,it is that simple!Science today is oft bloated and blinded by its
obsession for a material answer,to an immaterial reality?

kind regards michael.

[Infinite Consciousness]

Whereas the Grand Unified Theory involves consciousness at far higher frequencies of vibration than any known in this physical-material universe how on earth is any one going to understand the theory who is functioning at the frequencies of matter and knows of nothing but mind and its thinking functioning at matter frequencies ?

The theory of everything is only discovered or uncovered by human consciousness when it merges back in the Infinite Consciousness (beyond all expression) that it is ! It cannot be known by any expression - It is complete within Itself !

[G_burnett]

The ancient wisdom had the answer,centuries before you or your theory
ever saw the light of day!Maybe you should relook as to what they hold,
who knows maybe you will learn something!

regards michael.

Booleans Not Logic applied I fully agree Michael

G

[Meem]

I don't know a whole lot, and with what some people think they know, I'm not so sure I want to learn from "them." I like philosophy, science, nature, people, animals, there's so many things to like. The funny thing is even though I have a very great appreciation and "love" of science, I'm not very fond of math. It seems boring, arbitrary.

I will confess that I did not go through and read all of the things in this thread, I skimmed. One of the first things I noticed was that ... something mentioned about algorithms and human brain development.

Seems sort of odd, if we are all "human," but anyway. Two things that struck my ear, I guess you could say in a rather odd way, was a story I heard on BBC news, maybe both stories, I can't remember for certain.

One was about memes, the idea there is a genetic link to stories, I think there is more truth to that than I will ever understand in particular, but on peculiarity ... who knows, maybe that can change. The other, I can't be sure if I stumbled upon this from looking into memes or what, but I also came across the idea of memetic algorithms. The later is the "newer" idea I think. Both seem very interesting to me, as it almost suggests that there is a rhythm to randomness. So then, one really has wonder ... how random can random be if there appears to be certain harmonies involved?

I think both would fall properly under what I heard to also be a newly developed science of correlations. I really don't consider myself a philosopher or a scientist, but maybe a philo-scientist? Can there be such a thing? The love of science mixed with a love of wisdom? I want to be a teacher ... but I think I would be skinned alive for teaching with an open mind. Not trying to get people to think what I think, but just to get them to think for themselves.

It's like ... liking to watch the news, but every time I turn the news on, there is only bad news ... why? Where are my good stories?