Mindful-intent-Forces-Matter?

[mkirkpatrick]

I have a mathamatical equation that I would like to share with anyone who might be interested,It goes like this;Mind=Force=Matter=when squared =consc-
iouness=Itelligence=Solution to the T.O.E.
All Matter(as known to our senses) is the result of a Thought;and that Thought
Is Mind in Action,and that Action is the outcome of Energy;and that Energy is the product of Mind-substance-there indeed Matter is Mind-All is Mind-not only
in a metaphysical or mystic sense,but in Reality.
Thought-force communicates itself to the "outer manifestations" via the use of
Vortex-rings,some would call this Ether-whirlpool,out of which may pop an element,an "atom" In matter,possessing form,dimensions,as well as having within
itself Energy and mind,thus forming the Trinity of matter.There isof course no
such thing as dead-matter-all is alive,and thankfully Will remain so! If One Really
dead thing were found,then we would be no More,but that Cannot happen.The
universe is a living thing,the only dead thing maybe our old Ideas?

kind regards michael.

[Guille]

Michael,

Your equation isn't mathematical. As much it can be said to be pseudomathematical. It just has several different things said to be the same. But math is not only about that, i's about forces. SO if there are 5 Newtons of force, there should be 5 ª of minds where ª is the measurement o something of minds.

[mkirkpatrick]

You are quite my Amigo,my mathamatics,are sort of pseudo-I
know about as much about mathamatics as a Dung-Bettle know about Newtons
second-law on thermodynamics,(they like it warm you know!)But I do know that
the answer to the mystery of life is a very simple equation,which is this,All is Mind and Mind is All,a child could understand That,and That is the Point,If a child cannot understand it then you are presenting it wrong,and over-complcating, that which is Very-Very-Simple.
kind regards michael.

[Guille]

I agree the principles of the TOE and of all understanding must be simple.

But, why should I take your particular principles over all the others I've read? Can you give a proof of it (at least argumentative)?

[mkirkpatrick]

Arguementative,well let me see,there are three little slogans at the end of your posts,amigo,let me take them one at a time,1/"words arew not facts"no indeed they are not,I agree!But then what are they!Words have their arising in mind and are then informed into sound and projcted towards the listener,who hears the sounds of the ideation made manifest,then absorbs it back into its consciousnness where it may then spark-up a return ideation(a perfect closed loop system) 2/"truths are not knowledge",again I agree with you,but then What is truth?Maybe truth will come to you via the spiralling Double-helix!(by the way
that is a vortex too!)the truth is embedded within each one of us,you will not
accept truth from me or any other living soul,and that is the way it Should be.the truth is vouchsafed within you,and it will unfold like a rose bud on a spring-morning when the time is right,and You decide that my friend!and last
there is 3/"good is not happy"well again I agree,but then what is good!I know that real happiness can only come when we know ourselves,and have developed
a sense of inner-peace and serenity,goodness is just the absense of bad!

well enough said,
regards michael.

[Guille]

Mike,

thanks for commenting on my signature, I was waiting for someone to do it.

Well, words are not facts. They are expressions of ideas. Ideas are elements of the mental existence, but not facts of reality. Thus, any derivation from them, such as words, are not facts. but this leas to a horrible paradox: all the objects created b humans are thus not facts, because they derive from ideas. So I still haven't solve this, I will let you know if I do.

Truths are not knowledge. They are the interpretation of reality. Truth is what there is between the being and the reality. Interpret and interpreter, it is the interpretation. Whiles knowledge is part of the interpreter itself.

Good is not happy. Happiness is having time. Goodness is using time. Notice the difference. About them in life, well: Russell was correct when he said "the good life is one inspired by love and guided by knowledge" generalising it, "the good life is one inspired by feleings and guided by ideas" (the set of ideas includes knwoeldges and more). BUt the happy life, and this is mine, "is one inspired by ideas and guided by feelings": do you get the difference?

[mkirkpatrick]

Yes I do my friend,may you continue to be inspired and guided by your feelings.
regards michael.