[volantis]

For those who would like to read Dayton Miller's own words concerning the correct interpretation of the Michelson-Morler, Morley-Miller, and Dayton Miller experiments, the Science article is available here in Microsoft Word document format:
http://www.16pi2.com/files/Aether_Da...er_Article.doc

Here we can clearly see that an Aether was detected. The so-called "null" interpretation was merely a spin campaign to bolster Einstein's Special Relativity theory.

Dave

[Guille]

That might be true or not. We can't base our whole knolwedge on Miller's opinion. But I agree, neither we can on Einstein's.

[volantis]

Originally Posted by <<>> That might be true or not. We can't base our whole knolwedge on Miller's opinion. But I agree, neither we can on Einstein's.

An important difference between Miller's and Einstein's opinins is that Miller's are grounded in actual experiments, whereas Einstein never performed a single experiment related to his ideas.

[Guille]

Originally Posted by volantis An important difference between Miller's and Einstein's opinins is that Miller's are grounded in actual experiments, whereas Einstein never performed a single experiment related to his ideas.

yes. But there is no reason why a prior verification should be more important or more valauble than a posteriori verification (Einstein's thought experiments).

Plus, nobody has done the experiment again and proved the aether.

[volantis]

Originally Posted by <<>> yes. But there is no reason why a prior verification should be more important or more valauble than a posteriori verification (Einstein's thought experiments). Plus, nobody has done the experiment again and proved the aether.

A thought experiment is not an experiment, it is a fantasy. The fantasy is not limited by the laws of physics, so an improper assumption would never be detected.

There is abundant daily evidence for the Aether. As you have seen on this TOE Quest forum, I have quantified the Aether as a fabric of quantum rotating magnetic fields. All magnetic fields are thus direct evidence of the Aether. If you want to perform a simple test, right now, to prove the existence of the Aether, place the north or south pole of a magnet up to a CRT computer monitor or CRT TV. If you twist the magnet back and forth and the pattern follows the magnet, then there is no Aether and magnetic fields are an extension of matter. However, if you twist the magnet but the pattern does not follow the twisting action of the magnet material, then the magnetic field is part of the surrounding space-time and not the magnet.

If you want proof of the existence of the Aether, carefully study the Aether Physics Model. The entire spectrum of quantum knowledge is perfectly explained by quantifying the Aether, including a mathematically correct and complete Unified Force Theory.

What more can you expect from physics than real demonstrations for the existence of Aether and the math and data to quantify it?

[Guille]

Nothing else. Volantis, I already mentione dbefore that if I had to choose a TOE proposition it would definatelly be aether physics model. It's proper, not like most. And the best thing is that it sticks to reality, not like one that I know (strings). But such a theory still needs to be carefully observed. I'm too busy now, but in late december I wil come arond the pages of the web page.

[volantis]

Originally Posted by <<>> Nothing else. Volantis, I already mentione dbefore that if I had to choose a TOE proposition it would definatelly be aether physics model. It's proper, not like most. And the best thing is that it sticks to reality, not like one that I know (strings). But such a theory still needs to be carefully observed. I'm too busy now, but in late december I wil come arond the pages of the web page.

Thanks for the vote of confidence in the Aether Physics Model.

As for String theory, I recently watched a NOVA special on it. The entire three hour program is available online. I believe the concept of vibrating strings of energy is incorrect, but when I saw what the math predicts (observing the graphics in the NOVA special) I realized that many concepts within String theory do apply to the Aether Physics Model. The math of the String theory demonstrates some key processes of the APM and will likely be incorporated at some time.

[Guille]

I don't find string theory completelly wrong either. It does have some good points. For example, I agree that they four forces of nature are made of particles (for me, waves are only illusions). Now, I don't know about stirng theory math, I've heard it's very complex. Is it that ocmplicated? What math background is needed?