'Wisp' (or its author) inspired me to write this - by one of his webpage's comments: "I'll be sure to tell you if Wisp theory is wrong."

Wisp theory is a collection of rules, I presume. Then there are dreams which we all know exist. Daydreams and nightdreams. Suns, moons, stars, even String Theory exist. While String Theory may be contentious it has rules which it lives by, and those rules are held to be correct.

I'm coming to the point of wrong/right Wisp. Then there's God which (or Whom) for the religions and others offers proofs in the wonders of the world in which we exist. For many of the sciences and also others, God is an anachronism - an old idea out of step with today. The analysis of the sciences is that God is basically a comfort thing.

A house built without the usual rules could be termed wrong. The person who built it either didn't know the rules or was too lazy to follow the rules. But the house follows rules such as gravity and because of the ignorance of the usual rules will probably fall over.

So today there are many rules and these rules can be used to construct, theories, Gods, houses. There are all governed by something.

Is Wisp right/wrong? Newton right/wrong? A house right/wrong? Religions, right/wrong? They exist and each is a construct of rules. Everything is part of the TOE and everything follows its rule, which exists in everything. So Wisp cannot be wrong. Neither is a badly built house or God, or the sciences.

More simply I'm saying, for example, that 2+2=5 can be seen as incomplete. I'm not playing semantics, but I'm suggesting a wider view. 2s exist, 5 exists. Certainly there are categories of right and wrong if a particular outcome is desired.

You do not know the outcome (the TOE) which governs the world, the universe and everything, but you obey its rule, right or wrong, war or peace, God or science and 2+2. So in respect of the TOE everyone is right because the TOE is being obeyed.

Everything exists and will arrive at an outcome whether it is wrong or right. So Wisp is not wrong, just incomplete and the latter he admits.