Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20
  1. #11
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,625
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile a walk in the park.

    That would be possible Antonio, if we can reduce resistance to zero, absolute zero,then superluminal speed would be a walk in the park?

    kind regards michael.
    Last edited by dleviwing; 04-20-2006 at 12:49 PM.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  2. #12
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    The new idol of physics would be someone who makes superluminal speed a reality.
    That is possible if and only if the particle or body in question is time and mass independent, right?

  3. #13
    7th degree Black Belt
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    India
    Posts
    1,000
    Blog Entries
    25
    Thanks Given
    111
    Thanked 48x in 38 Posts
    Rep Power
    39
    Just some clarification, what do you mean when you say time independent. I see the Antonio's signature but nothing goes into my head.


  4. #14
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    Quote Originally Posted by Mohan.C
    Just some clarification, what do you mean when you say time independent. I see the Antonio's signature but nothing goes into my head.
    Antonio can answer the question. I think it just means the speed is independent of time, but I'm not sure. I said time independence and mass independence because they were in his signature.
    Last edited by dleviwing; 04-20-2006 at 12:47 PM.

  5. #15
    4th degree Black Belt
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    450
    Blog Entries
    79
    Thanks Given
    2
    Thanked 34x in 30 Posts
    Rep Power
    30

    Talking It is confusing isn't it?

    It is obvious by now and generally seen as universal the fact the every measurement influence the outcome of itself. Take for example the latest neutrino oscillation discovering in MINOS. If we were to measure the same neutrino wave produced inside the particle accelerator we would obtain different "particles" at different distances from the beam source and there will be a "region" of space where no "particle" and "no wave" could be possibly detected. The old quote "Watched teapot never boils" was directed THEN to the relative limit of the human patience. No visual act could influence in any way the time water will boil since there is no "physical conection" betwen both of them. Centuries ago it was thought that our vision was light going out from our eyes, but that is history. However when today physicists measure the quantum world in their labs they use all kind of radiation [laser, short wavelength radio waves, etc] and those DO influence the outcome in a definitive way.

    One last word if I may about the speed of light. The speed of light is constant for each frequency of light. Just as electrons [a different type of quantum of E-M energy] move at different velocities due to their intrinsic energy content so photons of different colors move accordingly to the same principle.
    The vacuum does not change much where we have done those experiments but the actual detection of the small difference between the speed of each color photons is going to be a task for the far future. We have just open a new chapter with MINOS experiments and light is a long way ahead of today's science... We could say is part of today's science fiction.
    Our apparatus are not able to detect the small difference on speed across the vacuum between those photons with different intrinsic energy since it would demand a high level of instrumental sophistication that we don't have yet. Our minds [however] CAN AND SHOULD go beyond those "technical barriers and "predict" what the future holds...

    HUMANBYDEFAULT

  6. #16
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    double down everything

    If you get two aces in a game of blackjack, the logical thing to do is to double down or nothing. But if you win then you get twice the amount of your bets. In the physical world, this double pleasures are time independence and space independence or spacetime independence. Realistically, we can't have both. However, the true vacuum has it! And the outcome is that it cannot be measured.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  7. #17
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    If you get two aces in a game of blackjack, the logical thing to do is to double down or nothing. But if you win then you get twice the amount of your bets. In the physical world, this double pleasures are time independence and space independence or spacetime independence. Realistically, we can't have both. However, the true vacuum has it! And the outcome is that it cannot be measured.
    And can we be space and mass independent, or time and mass independent (or are both also impossible)?

  8. #18
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    casinos are there only because ...

    Quote Originally Posted by GUILLE
    And can we be space and mass independent, or time and mass independent (or are both also impossible)?
    It is our belief that we will win which made the casinos to remain open for business, for they know the secret of the ultimate law of probability of knowing when to quit when you are ahead.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  9. #19
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    It is our belief that we will win which made the casinos to remain open for business, for they know the secret of the ultimate law of probability of knowing when to quit when you are ahead.
    Can you elaborate this and put into the physical means? (I knwo whatit means as example, but the human mind is only capable of going from concept to example, not from example to concept.)

  10. #20
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    the increase of entropy

    Quote Originally Posted by GUILLE
    Can you elaborate this and put into the physical means?
    The increase of entropy as stated in the 2nd law of thermodynamics - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_...thermodynamics and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermodynamics
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

 

 
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. The Uncertainty Principle
    By Robert in forum Anomalies
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 07-26-2009, 08:26 PM
  2. principle of superposition
    By AntonioLao in forum Quantum Physics
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 01-08-2007, 02:18 PM
  3. Jacobi’s principle and space axes
    By AntonioLao in forum Cosmology
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-28-2005, 02:41 PM
  4. general principle of equivalence
    By AntonioLao in forum Your TOE Theory
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 05-22-2005, 02:16 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top