A Real Theory of Everything

[Planet_Bob]

Yes, I wondered about gravity also.

Presumably this is correct, given that it passed the referees, but it came as a suprise to me.

Any calculation based on the orbiting habits of stars would have to be purely theoretical, hence why it would be acceptable by any referees.

"We have determined that gravity's propagation speed is equal to the speed of light within an accuracy of 20 percent," said Ed Fomalont, an astronomer at the National Radio Astronomy Observatory (NRAO) in Charlottesville, VA. The scientists presented their findings to the American Astronomical Society's meeting in Seattle, WA.

Here's the link : How gravity was measured

Phew ! Just for a moment I thought that my whole understanding of how the universe works was wrong.

IMO, all the fundemental forces, including gravity and electrical are a bit like coffee. There's all manner of different flavours and each can be served up with a variety of accompaniments, but when you really get down to it, they all come from the same source, a coffee bean.
All the fundemental forces are all based around the same principle, but the properties differ.

• Gravity is defintely a mild decaf coffee - not very strong at all.
• Strong force is a rich roast with full cafeine. Turkish Coffee, the sort you can stand your spoon up in.

[humanbydefault]

I'm not going to repeat what other have said before and I'm not going to write here and now about the logical inexistence of the so-called "virtual particles" which in fact are so virtual no body have ever found one so far... (?)

Instead I'm going to talk about a medical case that happened pretty recently and it was televised a month or so ago.

It was in the series called "Medical Mysteries" and it is according to the medical science a "mystery" although I don't see it that way... Sorry!

It was the case of two premature born twins. One had a cronic heart problem that was in some [incomprehensible way] creating the same echoe of syntoms in his other brother. Both babies were consider for transplant only days after their birth and they decided to operate on the one with a worse heart first.
What happen later is what left the specialist with their mouth open: In a manner of hours the secon twin with apparently the same range of conditions was suddenly cured! Yes... CURED.
I wrote a long time ago an article-posting in this very forum titled "Biological Entanglement". If I'm not mistaken, I had only one serious response back then and It was a sort of humanistic approach to my idea contradicting my views by considering a sort of "emotional or spiritual link" between twins and common occurrences in real life.... This is history now and I didn't took it seriously in the first place that's why I didn't respond then to the reply... Now I would like to hear again someone trying to convincing me that "biological entanglement" does not belong to this "world."

I said then and repeat now that entanglement goes beyond simple photons and quantum "quasi-particles." It is false to see reality that way. Enatanglement is nothing more than the TRUE CONNECTION between what we decided to divided as REDUCTIONISTIC BEHAVIOUR and HOLISTIC BEHAVIOUR along every universal SCALE... [cosmic, cellular, atomic,etc].

In other words: What should behave in a simple reductionistic way [manner, fashion] according to our human-conceived classical or quantum rules are so interconnected in real-time that SPEED is IRRELEVANT in the very sense of its meanning. We speak of the speed of light so often that we thought we have reached the limit of the universal knowledge... we couldn't be more wrong in this. Even lab experiments have proved that in some rare cases the speed of light have been SURPASSED in order to account with the final results... I believe it was by the way.
I do believe that just as we have discovered the realationship between energy and matter in quantum mechanics there is also a compromising relationship between space and time that goes beyond primitive relativistics concepts. I beleive that in the universal scale time and space are connected in an absolute way and THAT IS THE ONLY REASON WE CAN'T FIND THE ANSWER OR THE TRUE BEHIND THE WEIRDNESS OF ALL TYPE OF ENTANGLEMENTS... INCLUDING A BIOLOGICAL ONE AS IN THE CASE OF THIS POST.

Thanks for your time.

HUMANBYDEFAULT

[WillieB]

Tesla,

After absorbing your opening post on this thread this is submitted with a great deal of humility. As far as physics is concerned I am still trying to talk my teachers into advancing me from the first grade to the second. Nevertheless I am still firmly convinced in the applicability of the basic concept that is expressed in “The Incremental Universe.” When that paper was composed and placed on the web my ignorance in the field was nothing short of monumental. Since that time I have joined a couple of forums and, through researching the references on those sites, I have come to realize just how little I knew and still know. However, nothing that I have read has dimmed my conviction that there could be a starting point contained in the reasoning that led to its existence.

Your essay has reinforced this conviction. There were so many points made which caused my reaction to be “that could fit” or “I knew it had to operate that way.” The impetus in the preparation was an attempt to more logically explain the imposition of physical forces by field phenomena. The carrier that was invented fits so neatly into so many areas that I simply refuse not to believe in its actual existence. I know that the simplistic nature of the paper puts my naiveté on display, but nevertheless, I do so hope that you will go to www.theincrementaluniverse.com and give the concept some serious consideration.

If I were to rewrite the paper today there would be many areas which would be severely edited. The most glaring discrepancy is the depiction of the increment itself in figure 1. It does not properly show the “spin” characteristic of the paired bundles in their orbits. They actually follow a helical path to form the overall torus. The first four words of discussion item 1 should have read “Otherwise empty space contains,” not “Space itself consists of.” Also, I would have spurned the actual existence of fractional charge in the quarks and assigned a value of one electron or one positron charge to each and every charge bundle.

I do hope that you will find the time to consider this.

Sincerely,

Bill Britton

[gautam]

To me it looks quite simple to unite the rest of the forces with gravitational force. Even theory of relativity seems compatible with quantum physics. We are not far from find the theory of everything. There seems to be a small handicap. We must take ourselves (observer) out of it. Or we shall keep getting truth little distorted. We shall be defining all entities such as time and space by standing out of the line.

[Lloyd Gillespie]

I think this thread of Tesla's deserves further investigations...

Regards,
Lloyd

[Rufus]

Tesla

Very Good article

Rufe