Two TOEs --- a long and short "Theory of Everything&quo

[Anonymous]

Click the following link for a FREE 200 page e-book "Theory of Everything"

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TheoryOfEverything/files/



Click the following link for a much shorter version:

http://a4.grp.yahoofs.com/v1/wAi8Pk9...hort%20TOE.htm


Have fun with these --- FREE --- little jewels



Hope your site does well.

[wisp]

Wisp Unification Theory is available free from
http://www.kevin.harkess.btinternet.co.uk or type "wisp theory" in google.
It is a serious theory, but because it opposes Einstein's view on space-time and supports the ether concept, it is difficult to get any recognition.
But one thing is sure: relativity is clearly wrong and wisp theory explains why.
Wisp theory developed from a simple idea that explained the cause of matter - a hole in the ether that forms into a fractal shape. This simple idea is a real gem, but it has failed to raise any interest in forum discussions. Much effort seems to be doing battle with Einstein's special relativity - a theory that fails to meet common sense criteria and yet has established itself as a fundamental pillar in modern science. It is wrong and has damaged the ability of scientist to think in an open-minded way.
Very soon one-way speed of light tests will show special relativity to be false.

wisp

- particles of nothingness

[Steve Hanson]

I have finished reading "The Final Theory" by Mark McCutcheon and have to say that I am surprised that there hasn't been any serious discussion of it anywhere. It's a very easy read and his explanations are short and to the point.

If you have read it, please show me why his orbital mechanics falls apart. You need to accept his conditions though. The only refutation I have seen assumes as a basic premise the existence of a gravitational force, which is what he says doesn't exist.

He seems to explain everything and all other theories are, at best, models that are built by coming at the problem from the wrong direction.

Amazing book. Amazing implications.

I would appreciate any help on orbital mechanics I can get. If he's wrong, it'll be the failure to explain how a planet rotates around the sun. I can see how it would 'appear' to move in an arc, but not how it completes a whole cycle.

[Robert]

Thanks Steve for bringing this up. I added "The Final Theory" by Mark McCutcheon to the Book Discussion Forum. Thought we could get a conversation going there regarding this book and the issues it generates. It comes at many established theories/principles with a new perspective and is sure to generate much discussion.