[dleviwing]

POK;
This should help you.
http://www.grandunification.com/PDFs/Table_A.pdf
http://myresearch.blogdrive.com/arch...-2005_o-0.html

[purveyor of knowledge]

DV,

I am aware of the right hand rule but that's not the issue. Surely you don't think I am uneducated! Thanks anyway, and I won't take offense since you didn't know. I never said that my coil negates electromagnetic theory. It doesn't. All I said is it's a coil that has never been done before. I am quite certain, for this planet at least! And inductive amplifiers do not use my coil. I double checked.

thank you, POK

[dleviwing]

POK;
It may be more useful to do the iron filing test to verify the magnetic lines are as you state them to be. Also more detail as to current and load conditions being used would also help.

BTW: individuals that do not provide a full profile must expect to be viewed as uneducated until their posts demonstrate otherwise. If you are an electronic engineer or tech, state that in your profile and I will assume it to be the truth unless your posts indicate otherwise.

[theunify]

Well, your all uneducated until you post in our Many Worlds Pub; first of all.

Two way magnets are noticable, yes, because you have overlapped two strong bi-polar fields and they have "stuck" in the material. Do these two bi-polar fields stablize each other or do they destabalize each other?

Hypothesis - Your overlapped bi-polar's will remain embedded in a material but will become weaker over time.

Hypothesis, 1 - If the fields are unequal in force one bi-polar field will eliminate the other bi-polar field through simple realignment of the material.

Conclusion - You must know now from studying the strengths of the forces that magnetic fields are caused by mediating particles supplied from outside of the material, and that the material itself simply acts as a conduit for it's channeling.

Discussion - Magnets are defined as bi-polar by convention, this is another way of saying that it is a approximation of the truth. Magnets are both bi-polar, and multi-polar as you have been demonstrating, not in concept, but in physical reality this occurs for simple reasons. The action of the magnet is a conduit for mediating particle (graviton) the gravitons enter one side (negative) and exit the (positive) side; this proves that it is possible for the magnet to be multi-poled, having gravitons exit and enter from random directions, creating a null effect. This also makes it theoretical possible to have a monopole magnet where the energy is drawn in, or drawn out, yet has no matching decrease or excrease of energy.

Very Very good thread, I believe this is one of the many theories which will be proven by The Unification Theory.

[purveyor of knowledge]

Thanks for the comments the unify. I am getting some real strange effects from the metal sphere that I magnetized using this coil. When I put the magnetized sphere on top of a compass and rotate the sphere clockwise the compass needle turns counter clockwise. I'm going to have to study it more before I can give you any real answers. Sometimes magnetism is more complex than we understand. The possibility for a monopole is not ruled out. Also the possibility that magnetism is mediated by gravity, and the converse - that magnetism can be changed into gravity - is very intriguing and warrants further study.

DV, if you want to ask me a private question I would be obliged to have that conversation in private. My background is not the issue here, and furthermore it is bad manners to assume somebody is uneducated, profile or no profile. That having been said, I agree with you, an iron fillings test is warranted. Everything is as I have indicated by the compass needle. And to answer your question, the coil was run with a nine volt battery for approximately one week and the direction of current was clockwise in both coils.

One more thing is I figured out what you were talking about that they use in inductive amplifiers. That's a regular torroidal coil! The difference is mine is two torroidal coils that pass through eachother in the same plane forming ninety degree intersection points. Nobody has made a coil like this before. As I'm sure you know, the magnetic field of a regular torroidal coil is confined to within the torroid. Not so with this different coil. Further study is warranted.

cheers!

[purveyor of knowledge]

Here's my latest experimental update for you guys, MK, DV, the unify, and all. You'll never guess what it is. It's a 2-d monopole! THat's right, it attracts north from both sides. Also it repels south from both sides as well (that means it's not just due to regular ferromagnetism). It's a lot of fun to see and I wonder if ya'll can figure it out how I did it? It's so easy but see if you can figure it out.

Ha ha, this is totally awesome and wigged out!!! See, education is not where it's at. Only figuring stuff out matters and somethings they teach you are impossible and that's not right. It's all about optimism fellow humans, believing in yourself and the world around you. Next step is that I'm going to try to make a fully 3-d monopole. I can't wait!!! Well, see if you guys and gals can figure it out and I'll update you when I get the 3-d monopole built and tested.

love and respect, purveyor of knowledge

[mkirkpatrick]

Originally Posted by purveyor of knowledge Here's my latest experimental update for you guys, MK, DV, the unify, and all. You'll never guess what it is. It's a 2-d monopole! THat's right, it attracts north from both sides. Also it repels south from both sides as well (that means it's not just due to regular ferromagnetism). It's a lot of fun to see and I wonder if ya'll can figure it out how I did it? It's so easy but see if you can figure it out. Ha ha, this is totally awesome and wigged out!!! See, education is not where it's at. Only figuring stuff out matters and somethings they teach you are impossible and that's not right. It's all about optimism fellow humans, believing in yourself and the world around you. Next step is that I'm going to try to make a fully 3-d monopole. I can't wait!!! Well, see if you guys and gals can figure it out and I'll update you when I get the 3-d monopole built and tested. love and respect, purveyor of knowledge

Thanks for the update POK,wish you well in your exciting endevours.

regards michael.

[theunify]

here is the quote from my work on the subject. I think you are looking for a simple calculus derivative; maybe I will have that for you soon once I take a closer look at this problem. Can you restate your problem in a scientific manner, Introduction, Hypothesis, and Alternative Hypothesis?

The force of electromagnetism is based on the speed of light.

The concepts involve similar Unified approaches as we have taken in Gravity where we dismiss the possibility of the magnet or planet causing it’s own field and rely more on what other energy exists in outer-space. The reason for this is that as you will see once we get down to the nuclear forces it is hard to imagine an object so small yet having the ability to create it’s own force particles which have the ability to escape to make a return journey which would cause attraction for any object in that return path.

Electromagnets use fields but also operate at the speed of

light; there are energy disturbances in magnets that cause the photons to bend space and "push" some objects away while bringing others closer due to the complex interaction between the gravitational forces proportioned to the electromagnetic forces.

Picture a bar magnet with positive and negative. Plus and

minus are sides used to determine which side will attract and which will repel. However they are both gravitationally similar but act totally different in the presence of one another. The process is simple, the negative side of the magnet conducts energy from space, and the positive side repels it.

It is the Universal-shape of the magnet that makes it

possible for photons to cause the negative side and the positive to have the same mass and different force vectors.

A similar concept of photons pushing objects instead of

magnetic fields pulling objects. So magnets may actually be pushed together by space rather than pull themselves that way. This magnet I keep talking about is the result of photons that act as gravitational force particles called gravitons. Gravitons need to be present in order for things to work. Magnets are conductors for gravitons.

[purveyor of knowledge]

I might agree, and I'll say one thing's for sure, magnetism and gravity are related in a phenomenological way. Question. Is a magnetic field subject to lorentz transformation the way everything else is?

Moving on, here's my latest experimental update which I promised Robert I would share with the forum

Emergent Property of Inter-rotating Alternating Magnetic Fields

Abstract:
Two dynamic inter-rotating magnetic circular arrays produce an emergent property that resembles a magnetic monopole

Methods:
Two magnetic circular arrays are composed, one made out of six points of magnetic repulsion (alternating N-S, S-N, etc.) and the other made out of six points of magnetic attraction (alternating E-W, W-E, etc.). The circular magnetic arrays are held in place with a mechanical system and they are allowed to intersect though eachother in the same plain such that the ration of the diameter of each array to the distance between their centers is the square root of two. One circle is out of phase with the other so that the two arrays can spin through eachother and none of their magnets collide.

Observations:
When the machine is spinning it creates an emergent phenomenon that resembles a magnetic monopole.

Conclusions:
More investigation is warranted. A slightly altered experiment will be done to see if the machine can create an emergent phenomenon that resembles a regular magnetic di-pole instead. This would demonstrate the recursive nature of magnetism. The possibility of the recursiveness of magnetism would shed light on other questions where recursiveness leads to an apparent paradox, such as the incompleteness theorem, the axiom of choice, Russell's paradox, and the theory of everything paradox presented by Guille (which asks if the theory of everything can explain itself, or in other words, is the theory of everything recursive?). Recursiveness has been accused by some people of being "circular logic," although it may be an ironic aspect of nature.

[purveyor of knowledge]

So here is a picture of the device which I constructed myself. Is anybody interested in this kind of research?