New Experimental Update!

[dleviwing]

Are you attempting to redefine the definition of “MONOPOLE” POK????
Your device is NOT a monopole!! Not even close to one.

[purveyor of knowledge]

Yes the device is made out of multiple magnets I can see that quite clearly. I am not fool. You're missing the point which is that when you send the device spinning all of the magnets rotating through eachother creates a unified effect. This unified effect is an emergent property of the inter-rotating magnetisms, not the magnets themselves. And yes, it does create a monopole field, although the field is very weak and only created when the device is in motion. Build the device yourself and you will see what I am saying, for demonstration be the judge of all things.

sincerely, pok

[mkirkpatrick]

It looks very interesting POK,but why is it outdoors!surely rain would damage it,would it not?What exactly does it do,or produce,I am totally unfamilar with such a device.

regards michael.

[Lloyd Gillespie]

So here is a picture of the device which I constructed myself. Is anybody interested in this kind of research?

When you get it to go perpetual, I'm all ears...

Regards,
Lloyd

[purveyor of knowledge]

Since MK asked I'll tell you all about it and the background behind it (ed. it's kind of a long explanation but it's fully linked and very informative)

To start off, Lloyd is right, this machine's design is as a perpetual motion device, but it is also based on a geometry germain to my theory. You see, when I first discovered my theory, which I did by correlating the big bang with what it seemed would happen if you sent something faster than TSOL according to General Relativity, it made me eventually realize that once the universe is expanding fast enough it's going to kind of turn itside out like the opposite of a big bang. I figure if two points seperated by slightly less than a planck distance begin expanding away from eachother at greater than lightspeed then positive time would actually completely "in"volve through itself and emerge in reverse, and this told me I needed a "mathematical" point where positive infinity met and connected with negative infinity. So I drew the number line and turned it into the number circle but I needed a symbol to represent my new point if it was going to be used in text books eventually which I figured it needed to be. From my subconscious and artistic side I drew up this symbol that looks something like this (http://www.photobucket.com/albums/y9...truesymbol.jpg)

THen eventually I figured out that the symbol I drew actually represented something that already existed - 1/0!!!! I realized this when I saw that you could draw the number circle such that every number is directly across from it's opposite reciprocal. So 1/2 is across from -2/1, and 3 is across from -1/3, etc.... And 1/0 is directly across 0. 1/0 is both positive and negative and 0/1 is neither. 0 is where 1/infinity meets -1/infinity and 1/0 is where infinity meets -infinity. So that's how I figured it out - by symmetry - but I actually figured it out before that, a long time ago (in 2001) and had forgotten. The REAL first time I figured it out was when I first was taught about 1/0 in Highschool Calculus as a senior in highschool (I was always in the accelerated classes). I realized 1/0 was simply the opposite of zero but my teacher said I had to be wrong. She said it wouldn't work because if 1/0=everything then everything*0=1 and we all know that anything*0=0. "But that's not totally true!" I told her because we don't know what 0/0*0 is. ANd furthermore, it could be that 1/0*0 DOES equal 1 as an extreme case because in reality, if you do the math, 1/0*0=0/0 and 0/0 can be equal to ANYTHING including 1. So anyway, that just goes to show that there is no reason 1/0*0 doesn't equal 1 and for that matter that 1/0 can't be defined for what it is, the opposite of 0.

So I pretended to believe my Math teacher and just went along with my normal highschool life. Then as I said, I had an epiphonetic moment back in 2005 before I joined toequest where I correlated breaking the speed of light with the big bang and it led me back to the idea of 1/0 from a different perspective - one of cosmology! I realized what I had forgotten and this time I understood how it related to cosmology and expansion so I knew I had to keep thinking about it. And now I also had this weird symbol that I didn't really know what it means.

So getting back to the symbol, the symbol shows the merging of
two circles with a circle in between, but it can also be drawn as a continuous loop which is how I first drew it. The symbol represents the merging of yin and yang, i.e. left and right or positive and negative infinity, and in the center is 1/0 - everything, the representation of perfect diametric symmetry. So the idea is that this symbol may relate to the underlying structure of the unified field. And just so everybody knows "1/0" and the "unified field" are synonymous in the english language because they both mean "1 thing completely undivided."

So around this time I made another accidental insight. It's almost like my whole life these clues have just been getting thrown at me. It happened when I started getting into antigravity when I rediscovered the Hutchison Effect one mourning when I dreamed my cell was ringing but really I was peeing in my bed. It's almost like I had to get up or I would have missed something. Well, I went to the internet at the lab and stumbled upon the hutchison effect again (I'd heard about it a long time ago in higschool on the discovery channel). The idea of the Hutchison Effect and also "free" or "zero-point" energy made sense to me at this time because in my theory it says that "1/0 is the total amount of energy that is" and also pretty much that "everything is possible by definition." That's when I discovered an amazing thing - that the symbol I thought was useless was actually contained in the design of a really amazing antigravity invention by Marcus Hollingshead. Here's an article about that little known device (http://english.ohmynews.com/articlev...64556&rel_no=1)
and you can hear an informative interview with Mr. Hollingshead here (http://www.americanantigravity.com/a...iew/Page1.html)

ALso since then I've noticed many other "odd" examples of this symbol. For example, if you look at the Aether Unit in Volantis's theory and you look down at it from the right angle (above and to a slant) it looks just like the symbol. Also there was this lady who had a near death experience in a Ballooning accident and during her experience she saw what is now called the "pattern knot" or simply "the pattern" which she descibed as "The pattern of life and love" or "primarily a matrix of personal and gloabl healing." It is equivalent to the symbol. Here's a link (http://www.math.uic.edu/~kauffman/MThoughts.htm) and here's her personal account (add www) near-death.com/dennis.html. Her name is Lynnclaire Dennis. ALso "the symbol" is the most recurrent image in advertising that I can find, as if it's loaded into our subconscious (or the subconscious of catchy ad designers). It even ends up in funny examples like this - (http://www.seenontv.com/prod-pages/i...llet_thumb.jpg) and this (http://www.weinholds.org/images/2012/25.jpg) and this (http://www.godandscience.org/images/hourglassnebula.jpg) and this (http://www.tvsnob.com/images/cbs_logo-thumb.jpg) and this
(www.coralcastlecode.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/mar99.jpg)!

Then one day I was sitting around with some magnets trying to think about how you could get them to push on eachother. I figured two intersecting circles could push on eachother, and without really thinking about the symbol (on purpose), I ended up coming up with the design you see. Actually I just came up with the interlocking circles, then to make it more like the symbol so that it would be complete I added the central core. Then it ends up resembling the marcus device somewhat.

Now as far as what does this device do, that's a very good question which I'm still figuring out. It's not completely built yet in all it's iterations but the version I have right now produces a very weak monopolar field when spinning. Actually the one you see pictured isn't around anymore and I called that one the "lightning director." The one before that was the first one and it was called "rainmaker 2006." That's because pretty much everytime I run one of these versions of this device it rains. I know it sounds crazy but I'm just telling you the facts. Here's a picture after a flood after one of the tests http://www.photobucket.com/albums/y9...topdestiny.jpg . Yep, the first one I built had no core and it rained and rained and there was this cloud just chilling right above my house (see this picture http://www.photobucket.com/albums/y9/sect/clouds2.jpg which was actually a couple of days later but it looked the same for several days) then it just kept raining when I went to the Tesla Tech conference in July and when I got back my whole town was being washed AWAY and the whole southwest was being inundanted with weather that even had the weathermen guessing!!! Of course that one broke the day of testing which was Jun 21st I believe. THen the next one I built and ran after the rains finally died down we had a huge lightning storm - that was the lightning director and it had a modified core. I still have the newspaper articles on all of this stuff because it came out in several articles in the Ruidoso News and also Lightning Director's storm made it into the Paydirt which is our campus newspaper. Then the next one I built with another modified core we had this huge hail storm. The one I've got right now isn't that powerful but I don't really mess around with it at high speeds. Plus it's got a bigger diameter so the intersection reaction isn't as strong and that's what's causing the rainfall I think.

He he, so that's what the device does. It's all based on the geometry of spacetime from what I can tell but I know it's pretty crazy. I'm still working it all out so give me some time. Equations are on their way, I promise. Eventually this machine IS going to be self-powered and it's going to help me figure out my theory a lot better and also help me derive equations that relate QM and GR, etc. Basically it's just a research tool that's a hole lot of fun. I left my plans in the woods and somebody took them. Luckily it's in my head but what if it falls into the wrong hands? Oh well, the informatin is here for everyone now. Just remember, with great technology comes great responsibility. Need I say my tagline again?

thank you

[mkirkpatrick]

Thanks POK for that very detailed explanation,I was particularly interested in the search
for gravity waves you provided in the link,seems that they are on the verge of "discovering" them!Hope your project works out.



regards michael.

[dleviwing]

POK;
I love a good yarn but you definitely have far too much fiber in your diet.

[purveyor of knowledge]

Thanks everybody. Here's a few more links that show "the symbol" (or aspects of it) in crop circle formations. Hmmm, is somebody trying to give us a message????

http://www.greatdreams.com/hodson~1.jpg






and one last view of the hourglass nebula which astronomers are still trying to figure out why it looks that way. I think I can make a guess (it's a subatomic structure that has been blown up to macro size, and that's what is being pictured in the crop circle above. It's the basic unit of spacetime - the same thing as Volantis's aether unit)

[Lloyd Gillespie]

To start off, Lloyd is right, this machine's design is as a perpetual motion device, but it is also based on a geometry germain to my theory. You see, when I first discovered my theory, which I did by correlating the big bang with what it seemed would happen if you sent something faster than TSOL according to General Relativity, it made me eventually realize that once the universe is expanding fast enough it's going to kind of turn itside out like the opposite of a big bang. I figure if two points seperated by slightly less than a planck distance begin expanding away from eachother at greater than lightspeed then positive time would actually completely "in"volve through itself and emerge in reverse, and this told me I needed a "mathematical" point where positive infinity met and connected with negative infinity. thank you

This is the interesting point of your entire post to me, POK. It represents another high overview of complete sub-quantum and quantum space mechanics, in the rough. I think it has value, for developing theory views. The complete hydrodynamics of the universe, can actually be seen through the similarities of this model, with the truest physical models of fundamental substance and motions...

regards,