Everything Forever: Learning To See Timelessness

[yossarian]

I am not sure if this has been posted, but this book looks fascinating. There are links to the introduction and first chapter at:

http://www.everythingforever.com/st_order.htm

[yossarian]

I posted this on another board and got slammed for being a mumbo jumbo laden metaphysicist.

is this legitimate science this book is based on, or mumbo jumbo?

it is highly theoretical, but it seems to have a solid scientific base it forms its ideas on, correct?

[mkirkpatrick]

I am not sure if this has been posted, but this book looks fascinating. There are links to the introduction and first chapter at:

http://www.everythingforever.com/st_order.htm

Thanks for the link,looks interesting,will check it out.

Cheers yo.



regards michael.

[Graybeard]

I read part one (will read the rest later) it didn't seem to contradict mainstream science.

Thank you for the Link.
greg

[Lloyd Gillespie]

I am not sure if this has been posted, but this book looks fascinating. There are links to the introduction and first chapter at:

http://www.everythingforever.com/st_order.htm

Hi Yossarian, and thanks for this link. It accurately explains the problems I have pointed out about the 2nd law of thermodynamics. The rest of the article has some questionable ideas, but it's well worth the read, just for the 2nd law clarifications, alone, and there are some nice extended theorizing about probabilities and possibilities, of fundamental universal mechanics...

Lloyd