Wishing Mr. Mark McCutcheon the Fame he Deserves.

[RascalPuff]

2.1 To whom it may concern:

Please explain Final Theory author Mark McCutcheon's omnipotent triumph over universal gravitation, Newton, Einstein, and the history and evolution of physical science.
The winner gets writers cramp?

Here is a sample - make sense - letter to one of Mr. McCutcheon's Lieutenants ('Nick'), from a newly recruited, wonderstruck member of The Final Theory's Lost Platoon:


Nick
Hello I have just recently joined the forum.
I think you have made a very clear point.
I am not in a position to speak with authority on the
Topic of Albert Einsteins picture of gravity, but I find
myself struck with wonder when I think that this idea
has been accepted for so long.
It is not a good comparison of real physics.
It seems we had a longing for someone to say something that
sounded profound back then.
No one know what he was saying and so everyone simply quoted others as time passed.
I think we need to start with real basic thought now, and make sure it make sense.


Post Script:
The first two electrifying chapters of McCutcheon's oxymoronically titled book are direct parallels of and, ostensibly extracted from Gravity Is The 4th Dimension, by Truly Yours. I am grateful for whatever attention Mr. McCutcheon may gather for himself, insofar as when he lays enough eggs on the other side of the road, the chickens will inevitably come home to roost. As I have said before on this issue, whether Mr. McCutcheon pirated my work or not is a technicality. The point is that his so called 'Final Theory' party is nearly 50 years tardy. I am grateful to Mr. Mark McCutcheon for publishing his work in hard copy and advertising it on the internet, although I must admit resenting his greed in selling my work at $30.00 per copy while mine is given away free. Should McCutcheon ever be obliged to pay me royalties I hereby publicly promise to give whatever that may amount to, to worthy charity. More will be said about this culminating intrigue and duplicity, later. (Any suggestions are welcome.)

Regards,
- R P (K. B. Robertson)

[mkirkpatrick]

Sometimes "getting what we deserve leaves a sour taste in the palate"lets hope that the
salt cellar is close by.



regards michael.

[RascalPuff]

Dear Michael:
Here's a man - Miles Mathis - who's done a lot of work on just about everything, including the kind of stuff I do. But the difference between him and McCutcheon is night and day. I hope you find time to mosey around a little at this link.

'May be produced for educational and non-commercial purposes.'
http://www.geocities.com/mileswmathis/index.html

The Third Wave: A Redefinition of Gravity is one of his works.

Best regards
- RP

[RascalPuff]

Dear Michael:
I'm noticing that the URL clicker I left you with is tempermental, so I'm sending the following column of clickable information. It'a all by Miles Mathis. He's terrific as a scientist and a man. I hope more peope here at T.O.E. famliarize themselves with his work.

P.S. This is my 200th post at Theory of Everything. I think it very appropriate. Should you choose to snoop around in this information, please let me know what you think of it.

Regards
- RP

Chapter List

i. Preface. A broad overview of the current state of physics and math, and an explanation of my intent with this book. 5pp.

ii. The Central Discoveries of this Book. What I believe I have achieved; an overview. 7pp.

1. A Revaluation of Time. This paper offers a simple operational definition of time, one which is useful in understanding the papers that follow. 6pp.

2. Relativity as a Concept. An introduction to the problem, preparing the reader for the mathematical arguments in later papers. 6pp.

3. The Michelson/Morley Interferometer. Here I explain the flaws in various conceptualizations of the interferometer, showing that no fringe effect should have been expected. It was originally published as Appendix A to the long paper in chapter 7. 12pp.

4. A Final Simplification of the Problem (of Special Relativity). This is a short paper glossing my main corrections to Einstein’s transforms. It was written after the papers in chapters 5, 6 and 7. 6pp.

5. The Discovery of First-Degree Relativity and the Refutation of Gamma. This is the paper I sent to several journals, including Annalen der Physik and Physical Review Letters, from 2001 to 2004. It condenses the information from the longer papers in chapters 6 and 7. 13pp.

6. A Critique of Einstein’s Original Paper. Here I attack Einstein line for line, using “On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies” (Annalen der Physik, 1905) as my text. This was to answer critics of my first paper [chapter 7] who believed that Einstein’s paper of 1905 still had precedence over math published later in the books Relativity and The Meaning of Relativity. This paper was originally published as Appendix C to the longer paper below. 8pp.

7. An Algebraic Correction to the Transformation Equations (The Lorentz Equations) of Special Relativity. This is my first paper on Special Relativity. It includes new first- and second-degree transforms, as well as new transforms for movement toward an observer and at an angle to an observer. In addition, it explains the interferometer, discusses the Hafele-Keating experiment, and suggests a solution to the Pioneer Anomaly. 48pp.

8. The Light Clock. A close analysis of the light clock, showing the many ways it fails as a visualization of time dilation. 3pp.

9. A Final Argument against x' = x - vt. </U> A short addendum to my proofs against this equation, once again using a text of Feynman as an example. 2pp.

10. The Equation x' = x - vt, Again. One more useful visualization of the problem, focusing this time on the immobility of origins in relative motion. 3pp.

11. How the Loss of Gamma affects Minkowski’s Space-time Equations. In this paper I show how Minkowski’s math must be affected by my corrections to Special Relativity. Also see chapter 49 below. 5pp.

12. How New Transforms in Special Relativity Affect Mass, Momentum and Energy Equations. Here I show that Einstein’s mass and energy transforms are also incorrect, including the famous E=mc2. I also show, for the first time, that the classical equation E=mv2/2 is not an approximation. Finally, I derive the number 108 for the proton. 41pp.

13. New Mass and Energy Transforms—a Gloss. A much shortened argument, compressing the paper in Chapter 12. 11pp.

14. An Overview of my Mass Increase Papers. A 2-page presentation of findings only, with no derivations and no analysis. 2pp.

15. Lorentz Invariance. How my corrections affect so-called Invariance, covariance, and violations. 4pp.

16. A Re-definition of the Derivative (why the calculus works—and why it doesn’t). This paper establishes for the first time the true foundation of the calculus. Rather than pursue a diminishing differential, as has been the quest of history, I have discovered the constant differential underlying the basic equation of the calculus. In doing this, I show that instantaneous values are impossible. 28pp.

17. Calculus Simplified. A compression of my long paper on the calculus. 13pp.

18. Trig "Derivatives" found without the old Calculus. Here I show that my simple exponent table from my calculus paper, and the constant differential, apply just as easily to trig functions. 3pp.

19. Another Fatal Flaw in the Historical Foundation of the Calculus. A further flaw in the current proof of the derivative, specifically in the assumption that the terms in an infinite series can approach a limit. I show that the sum approaches the limit, but the terms do not, nullifying the accepted procedure. 4pp.

20. A Disproof of Newton's Fundamental Lemmae. Newton's first 8 lemmae from the Principia are shown to be false. 6pp.

21. Quantum Mechanics and Idealism. My paper on the calculus is tied to QED here. Also a comparison of the idealisms of Heisenberg and Berkeley. Finally, a disproof of both idealisms, and a simple logical and mathematical refutation of the Copenhagen interpretation. 10pp.

22. Superposition. Both superposition and the wave-particle duality are explained mechanically, with a straightforward visualization. This falsifies the Copenhagen interpretation in the most direct way imaginable. 5pp. Also see #58 below.

23. Bohr's First Big Mistake. A major substitution error in the math of the Bohr radius is shown to infect all of QED. 3pp.

24. A Correction to a=v2/r (and a refutation of Newton's Lemmae VI, VII & VIII). In this paper I expose the errors in the derivation of a=v2/r, one of the bedrock equations of circular motion. In doing so I falsify Newton's famous Lemmae VI, VII & VIII from the Principia. 17pp.

25. Celestial Mechanics. A demonstration of the inadequacies of current theory regarding gravity, orbits, and nebulae. 18pp.

26. A Critique of General Relativity. A refutation of Einstein’s thought problem of the spinning disk and an analysis of the tensor calculus. Also, a solution to the primary problem of GR (the deflection of starlight) without tensors or Riemann. 13pp.

27. Another Critique of Curved Space, using an analogy to the electrical field. 4pp.

28. The Third Wave: a Redefinition of Gravity, Part I. No curved space, no force at a distance, no force-carrying particle. Gravity is explained here simply in terms of straight-line motion. Mass, inertia and gravity are all shown to be equivalent, reducible to the same motions. 9pp.

29. The Third Wave: a Redefinition of Gravity, Part II. An explanation of both atomic and macro orbits using the expansion "field" and the E/M field. 7pp.

30. The Third Wave: a Redefinition of Gravity, Part III. An explanation of the inverse square law using expansion theory. It is also shown that the Standard Model contradicts the law. 6pp.

31. The Third Wave: a Redefinition of Gravity, Part IV. Retrograde orbits, Triton, and the lack of angular momentum in the Sun are explained. 10pp.

32. The Third Wave: a Redefinition of Gravity, Part V. The aberration of starlight and gravity at the quantum level are explained. A proposal concerning the strong force is also made, linking it to the expansion of matter. 14pp.

33. The Third Wave: a Redefinition of Gravity, Part VI. The Ideal Gas Law as proof of Expansion Theory. 3pp.

34. The Third Wave: a Redefinition of Gravity, Part VII. The Moon as proof of Expansion Theory. Mass and weight using both the gravitational field and the E/M field. 15pp.

35. The Third Wave: a Redefinition of Gravity, Part VIII. Genesis. I introduce a new cosmology to contain my mechanics. 7pp.

36. The Third Wave: a Redefinition of Gravity, Part IX. The optical size equivalence (angular diameter) of Sun and Moon as proof of my theory. 9pp.

37. The Universal Gravitational Constant. I follow a hint from Maxwell to give the dimensions of G to the mass. 6pp.

38. Bending of Starlight by the Planets. Experimental proof of my theory of gravity. 7pp.

39. Contra Feynman. Some introductory comments on Richard Feynman, including a critique of Dicke's experiment. 13pp.

40. Richard Feynman and the Glorification of Heuristics. A further critique of Feynman and QED. 7pp.

41. Some Introductory Remarks on Cantor. A few observations on point-set topology and infinities. 5pp.

42. Zeno's Paradoxes. A short paper on Zeno's various paradoxes showing, among other things, that I am not opposed to limits or infinities in mathematics or in physics when they are used properly. 6pp.

43. Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems. Commentary in passing on Kurt Gödel, including analysis of Karl Popper, Bertrand Russell, and others. 6pp.

44. Proof that Classical Action is Invariant in a Galilean Transformation. A reply to a paper in American Journal of Physics that claimed that action was not invariant in a Galilean transformation. This transformation is x' = x -vt. 3pp.

45. Why Noether's Theorem is a Tautology. A short proof of Noether's Theorem by algebraic means, showing that symmetries are equivalent to conservation laws. This contradicts the current interpretation that symmetries are primary. 2pp.

46. Entropy. A refining of the concept of entropy, and a rebuttal to the current conceptions of order. 5pp.

47. A Break in the Pioneer Case. An article written for a popular journal showing, in the simplest possible way, the cause of the anomaly. 4pp.

48. What is π? Here I show that π is a centripetal acceleration and that the circumference of any circle has complex dimensions. 6pp.

49. Why Hyperbolic Math is not applicable to General Relativity. Here I show the flaw in i and the assumption that time travels orthogonally to x, y, z. 2pp.

50. String Theory: the Inelegant Universe. A Critique of String Theory and M-theory using Brian Greene's book The Elegant Universe as my text, including a foundational correction to the 11-dimensional math. 14pp.

51. Does Size Matter? The first entry in a new section answering readers' questions. Here I answer a question about the ratio of volume to surface area changing with size. 3pp.

52. A Call to Astronomers. A call to astronomers for confirmation of a prediction concerning the bending of starlight by Jupiter. 4pp.

53. The Moon Gives up a Secret. Numbers from the Moon are analyzed to show that "gravity" is a compound field. 4pp.

54. The Trouble with Tides. A thorough expose of the holes in current tidal theory. 10pp.

55. Explaining the Ellipse. Holes in the elliptical theory of orbits are filled at last. 4pp.

56. Why do Stars Twinkle? A new answer to this question and some commentary on the old answer. 6pp.

57. Squaring the Circle. Here I show various operational inconsistencies in claiming that the circle cannot be squared "with a straight edge and compass." 12pp.

58. The Collapse of the Wave Function. Written as an introduction to my paper on Superposition. See #21 above. 7pp.

59. Electrical Charge. Defining charge as the mass of the radiation. 9pp.

60. Goldbach's Conjecture Proved, the simple way. 5pp.

61. The Born-Einstein Letters, extended commentary on QED, GR, and other subjects. 14pp.

554pp. total. 4/14/2007.

[Graybeard]

Rascal ....

I read article number 50 (so far). I can't fault the logic, and it made me laugh hilariously re the reference to finding the string with a sieve.

I will certainly read more.

greg

quoting Miles Mathis (I think) "Another of the inelegances of string theory is the required energy of a string. The unbelievable amount of tension [10^39 tons] on a single string gives it a mass of some 10^19 protons.

This is about the mass of a grain of dust. The theorists need all this force on the string since they have gathered all the other forces here at the axiomatic level. This has the added benefit, they think, of making the mass too great to be discovered in an accelerator. Unfortunately, the mass is so huge that it should make the string discoverable by macroscopic means. I might suggest a sieve.

Seriously though, the theorists admit that "all but a few of the vibrational patterns will correspond to extremely heavy particles," meaning particles many times heavier than a grain of dust.4 It is hard to believe that masses of this sort floating around are undetectable."

[mkirkpatrick]

RP,"squaring the circle" is the heading here that caught my eye,I have always instinctively
known that this could be done,I am most grateful to you for reconfirming that fact to me.
I thank you most kindly sir.


regards michael.

[Andrew]

Dear RascalPuff:
My name is Andrew and I don't post on the forum as often as I want to becasue of having quite a troubled Internet connection. I work on TOE myself as many on this forum and I'm trying to collect al the information available. Unlike Mr. McCutcheon I promise everybody that if I have something written or published I will respect their ideas by due quoting. I'm unable also to buy anything online and I wrote about it to Mr. McCutcheon asking him if he could send me a copy of his book free of charge promising him to respect his words the same receiving no answer whatsoever - positive or negative. So now I send the same request with the same promise to You: can You send me a copy of all your 50 articles via e-mail? I'm just unable to download them one by one from the site. Thanks, Andrew.

Beg pardon, 61 article, 554 pages - a lot of reading! And a lot of writing, congratulations!

[RascalPuff]

Dear RascalPuff:
My name is Andrew and I don't post on the forum as often as I want to becasue of having quite a troubled Internet connection. I work on TOE myself as many on this forum and I'm trying to collect al the information available. Unlike Mr. McCutcheon I promise everybody that if I have something written or published I will respect their ideas by due quoting. I'm unable also to buy anything online and I wrote about it to Mr. McCutcheon asking him if he could send me a copy of his book free of charge promising him to respect his words the same receiving no answer whatsoever - positive or negative. So now I send the same request with the same promise to You: can You send me a copy of all your 50 articles via e-mail? I'm just unable to download them one by one from the site. Thanks, Andrew.

Dear Andrew:
A condensed presentation of my book is available at no cost at URL http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie . You are welcome to cut and paste all or portions of that work (in progress) and may reproduce it - with acknowledgement of origin - at no cost, for educational or non-commercial purposes. Although the 6th small press, 1979 edition of my work was 627 pages duration, it is sold out and not posted on the internet. How did you get the impression that there are '50 articles'?
Best regards,
RP (K. B. Robertson)

[Andrew]

Dear Mr. RascalPuff (Mr. Robertson)
The Forum managers will de rightfully upset by the fact that we exchange private messages here, but I want to thank You deeply for the answer. My net connection is particularly horrible today and I'm unable to go through the links of private messages right now. So accepting the risks of it, I have no choice but to give You my e-mail address here. Please, send me a message with Yours so we can leave the Forum for the debate of its subjects: spasver04@yahoo.com. Thank You once again, Andrew.

[RascalPuff]

Dear Andrew:
I think you may be confusing my forum at http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie with the website of Miles W. Mathis at
http://www.geocities.com.mileswmathis/index.html . 'The Greatest Standing Error in Mathematics and Physics'. Mr. Mathis' website is much larger and more wide spectrum than mine, though, like me, he does offer his copyrighted material for reproduction, providing that his name is properly accredited and the informaton is used for educational, non-commericial purposes. My email address is kraziequus@yahoo.com.

Another site you may find very interesting is http://www.spaceandmotion.com/help/i...sics-space.htm . Compliments of Ms. Karene Jade Howie and Maestro Geoff Haselhurst, who likewise offer the information on their site for free, with acknowledgements of its origin and stipulation that it will be used for educational and non commercial purposes only.

Let me know how things go for you.

Regards,
- RP (K. B. Robertson)