Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Theory of Everything > TOE Theories
Reload this Page Reciprocal Balance - the 'simple' approach
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Re: Reciprocal Balance - the 'simple' approach
Old
  (#11 (permalink))
9th degree Black Belt
N0B0DY has a spectacular aura about
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,941
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 110x in 104 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rep Power: 27
   
Re: Reciprocal Balance - the 'simple' approach - 07-06-2007, 12:56 PM

"So do you have any proof that the universe is infinite? I have a philosophical difficult time imagining any real thing as infinite. No problems with conceptual things like numbers, points, curves, etc."

If the universe wasn't infinite, we would then have to conclude that the universe exists within a place that isn't there which is easy enough to prove to be illogical. Living inside a finite universe would be synonymous to living inside a house with no outside.

Eventhough my interpretation is abstract, the functioning requires infinity to allow for finite observations because there can be no logical boundary attributed to residual effects. Logically, the area affected must increase infinitely and the force of the effect must decrease infinitely - beyond what can be detected consciously.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: Reciprocal Balance - the 'simple' approach
Old
  (#12 (permalink))
Grandmaster
Profpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to behold
 
Profpat's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,203
Thanks Given: 332
Thanked 544x in 496 Posts
Join Date: May 2007
Rep Power: 48
   
Re: Reciprocal Balance - the 'simple' approach - 07-06-2007, 01:05 PM

You are right Michael that concept has to come from somewhere. Nobody thanks for the input.

I think I'll post this as a question on the forum, and get this off THoR's site. ( Sorry THoR )

Best to all,

Profpat
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: Reciprocal Balance - the 'simple' approach
Old
  (#13 (permalink))
Orange Belt
THoR is on a distinguished road
 
THoR's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 21
Thanks Given: 5
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Join Date: Jun 2007
Rep Power: 0
   
Re: Reciprocal Balance - the 'simple' approach - 07-07-2007, 03:58 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by N0B0DY View Post
"So do you have any proof that the universe is infinite? I have a philosophical difficult time imagining any real thing as infinite. No problems with conceptual things like numbers, points, curves, etc.


Elementary theory of numbers. For every integer you can add +1 and achieve a greater value. The axiom applies to any measurement - time, distance, hiccups - unless a limit applies. It is not infinity that requires proof - it is the existence of a limit.
Quote:
If the universe wasn't infinite, we would then have to conclude that the universe exists within a place that isn't there which is easy enough to prove to be illogical. Living inside a finite universe would be synonymous to living inside a house with no outside. Eventhough my interpretation is abstract, the functioning requires infinity to allow for finite observations because there can be no logical boundary attributed to residual effects. Logically, the area affected must increase infinitely and the force of the effect must decrease infinitely - beyond what can be detected consciously.


"Eventhough my interpretation is abstract, the functioning requires infinity to allow for finite observations because there can be no logical boundary attributed to residual effects. Logically, the area affected must increase infinitely and the force of the effect must decrease infinitely - beyond what can be detected consciously." You've lost me here, plez xplain.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: Reciprocal Balance - the 'simple' approach
Old
  (#14 (permalink))
Grandmaster
Profpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to behold
 
Profpat's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,203
Thanks Given: 332
Thanked 544x in 496 Posts
Join Date: May 2007
Rep Power: 48
   
Re: Reciprocal Balance - the 'simple' approach - 07-07-2007, 04:47 PM

THoR,

Numbers don't have limits conceptually. The universe and time and space may indeed have limits. Just because we are expanding now doesn't mean it's going to expand forever. It just may stop and contract.

Profpat
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: Reciprocal Balance - the 'simple' approach
Old
  (#15 (permalink))
Orange Belt
THoR is on a distinguished road
 
THoR's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 21
Thanks Given: 5
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Join Date: Jun 2007
Rep Power: 0
   
Re: Reciprocal Balance - the 'simple' approach - 07-08-2007, 08:55 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Profpat View Post
THoR,

Numbers don't have limits conceptually. The universe and time and space may indeed have limits. Just because we are expanding now doesn't mean it's going to expand forever. It just may stop and contract.

Profpat
Expanding? Is the infinite universe expanding? Into what?

The sound of galloping hooves does NOT mean the zebras are stampeding.

Given a finite number of moving objects randomly vectored at random velocities within a finite volume, eventually all collisions which could occur WILL occur - within a finite period of time. Many of those collisions may occur outside of the original volume, but they will still take place within a finite period and within a finite distance. Once all collisions have occurred, all objects will eventually reach the boundary of the initial volume and except for those very few which may be moving at exactly the same velocity in precisely parallel paths, they will all be moving away from each other.

There is more than one explanation for the 'big bang' observations of astronomers. I concede the possibility of some local cosmic engine reaching critical mass and exploding, but it occurred in that infinitesimal portion of the universe visible to our limited technology.

There is more to the universe than meets the telescope - x-ray, radio or otherwise.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: Reciprocal Balance - the 'simple' approach
Old
  (#16 (permalink))
MJA
7th degree Black Belt
MJA is a jewel in the roughMJA is a jewel in the rough
 
MJA's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,079
Thanks Given: 155
Thanked 127x in 108 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2007
Rep Power: 18
   
Re: Reciprocal Balance - the 'simple' approach - 07-08-2007, 10:36 AM

Until man knows the finite extent of the universe, it will be known as infinite!

MJA


The truth of everything is less than one inch,
it is only equal and the lion is one.
One is free when the door is opened,
education has the key.
=
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to MJA For This Useful Post:
THoR (07-08-2007)
Re: Reciprocal Balance - the 'simple' approach
Old
  (#17 (permalink))
Moderator
mkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to behold
 
mkirkpatrick's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 7,340
Thanks Given: 348
Thanked 703x in 655 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rep Power: 94
   
Smile Re: Reciprocal Balance - the 'simple' approach - 07-08-2007, 10:57 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by MJA View Post
Until man knows the finite extent of the universe, it will be known as infinite!

MJA
I agree MJA, simple and yet profound,I like it! Thanks.



regards michael.


Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Triumph of Life, Love, and Being (Part 2/2) austintorn@aol.com Philosophy Articles 0 06-23-2007 04:33 AM
Auxiliary T.O.E. Pt. IV RascalPuff TOE Theories 0 05-18-2007 04:19 AM
Philosphical TOE (draft notes) Jamesh Your TOE Theory 12 01-31-2007 06:27 PM
Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)? socratus Quantum Physics 9 01-30-2007 08:07 PM
Different approach to TOE description force5 TOE Theories 1 05-22-2004 09:42 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com