Forget Every there is only Thing!

[mkirkpatrick]

Supposing we have all wrong! This is the theory that I purpose,the very word "everthing"
seems to conjure up a whole multitude of seperate things,but,I suggest that there is no
"every" just thing manifested in a mulitude of ways,but in reality they are all the same
thing.

If this were so,then our theory of everything would be changed to the theory of thing.
It is behind the scenes that interests me,what is happening at the invisible level of causes.

I maintain that if you "look" behind the scenes of "all things" you will always find the same
one thing! Call it energy interactions,or whatever,they are always the same,Thing,never
the plural,things.

The very word everything enables confusion to rise up and blind us from the simplicity
of thing-one energy "appearing" as many.

I would be grateful for your thoughts on this fellow toequesters.

warm regards michael.

[Lakshya]

Supposing we have all wrong! This is the theory that I purpose,the very word "everthing"
seems to conjure up a whole multitude of seperate things,but,I suggest that there is no
"every" just thing manifested in a mulitude of ways,but in reality they are all the same
thing.

If this were so,then our theory of everything would be changed to the theory of thing.
It is behind the scenes that interests me,what is happening at the invisible level of causes.

I maintain that if you "look" behind the scenes of "all things" you will always find the same
one thing! Call it energy interactions,or whatever,they are always the same,Thing,never
the plural,things.

The very word everything enables confusion to rise up and blind us from the simplicity
of thing-one energy "appearing" as many.

I would be grateful for your thoughts on this fellow toequesters.

warm regards michael.

Actually I think the TOE should explain everything that's why there is 'everything' in it. It should explain the nature of everything, our universe, it should also explain that for example what Mr. x will be doing after 9 hours, 5minutes and 6 seconds as it is the theory of everything, it should also explain the past and what is one thinking etc. It should explain everything in the universe whether it is in space notions or intime notions. Surprisingly, suppose that string theory becomes TOE then it should also explain why this theory works so well in explaining everything and also the reason it states for the above question it should also justify that why that reason works so well and the reason made for that reason and..........................I hope that u have understood my meaning as most of the people to whom I say these type of things become confuse. At last I want to say that 'everything' means something that one can't imagine. It is not one thing but it is so big the everything.

[mkirkpatrick]

Actually I think the TOE should explain everything that's why there is 'everything' in it. It should explain the nature of everything, our universe, it should also explain that for example what Mr. x will be doing after 9 hours, 5minutes and 6 seconds as it is the theory of everything, it should also explain the past and what is one thinking etc. It should explain everything in the universe whether it is in space notions or intime notions. Surprisingly, suppose that string theory becomes TOE then it should also explain why this theory works so well in explaining everything and also the reason it states for the above question it should also justify that why that reason works so well and the reason made for that reason and..........................I hope that u have understood my meaning as most of the people to whom I say these type of things become confuse. At last I want to say that 'everything' means something that one can't imagine. It is not one thing but it is so big the everything.

I understand you Lakshya,and I thank you for your most thoughtful contribution here
on this thread.

warm regards michael.

[mkirkpatrick]

In trying to tie up the many,the one slips out through the door unnoticed?This is the constant problem that science fails miserably to grasp,or even see.

If we say there is just energy,that's all,universal energy is thing,there are no(things) energies,just(thing) energy.

We then have the theory of thing,which will be found to be so much more simple
that chasing all these fictitious particles with exotic names that mean nil,and keep producing themselves when they are predicted!All this mental gymnastics can be relaxed
leave the manic bi-polar search for things,and focus on the one Thing-energy!


regards michael.

[Lakshya]

In trying to tie up the many,the one slips out through the door unnoticed?This is the constant problem that science fails miserably to grasp,or even see.

If we say there is just energy,that's all,universal energy is thing,there are no(things) energies,just(thing) energy.

We then have the theory of thing,which will be found to be so much more simple
that chasing all these fictitious particles with exotic names that mean nil,and keep producing themselves when they are predicted!All this mental gymnastics can be relaxed
leave the manic bi-polar search for things,and focus on the one Thing-energy!


regards michael.

Michael, you have again come to that 'thing'. I have already told you why it is 'everything'. Please read it again and you will get answer in it. OK I tell you particularly the answer of this question. We want to know the reality and those particles are not fictious. We are developing a model which can help us understand this whole universe. We can't overlook anything and make our task easy and we want a model of everything. That's why we use 'everything'.

[mkirkpatrick]

Michael, you have again come to that 'thing'. I have already told you why it is 'everything'. Please read it again and you will get answer in it. OK I tell you particularly the answer of this question. We want to know the reality and those particles are not fictious. We are developing a model which can help us understand this whole universe. We can't overlook anything and make our task easy and we want a model of everything. That's why we use 'everything'.

Lakshya,I understand what you are saying,thank you for your input here.


warm regards michael.

[mkirkpatrick]

When we can eventually see with the eyes focussed on the singular rather than the plural
we then shall see a giant step forward for mankind taking place.

Energy there is a plenty of,unlimited supply in fact,but energies do not,nor ever have existed,period.




regards michael.

[Lakshya]

I think that you are right and want to give a simple answer to that question that is the only energy is present in the form of strings and so string theory is the theory of thing according to you but I say that different fluctuations in strings make different particles and so to understand why different fluctuations make different particles is also the work of string theory. So we can say that it is theory of everything or every particle or every matter. By the way, good question I was not able to understand it completely and that's why I was replying strangely.

[mkirkpatrick]

I think that you are right and want to give a simple answer to that question that is the only energy is present in the form of strings and so string theory is the theory of thing according to you but I say that different fluctuations in strings make different particles and so to understand why different fluctuations make different particles is also the work of string theory. So we can say that it is theory of everything or every particle or every matter. By the way, good question I was not able to understand it completely and that's why I was replying strangely.

Many thanks Lakshya,for your valued input here,what I am attempting to do here
really is to basically simplify a rather complicated way of understanding reality.

Hope you can help me to suceed.


regards michael.

[Lakshya]

Can I ask you a question michael. I have read about light cone in many books but till now I have not been able to completely understand what is it? The more I read the more I get confused Please help me.