Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 5 of 21 FirstFirst 12345678915 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 204
  1. #41
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,625
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: T-0-0- T-0-T theory.

    Realisation is the awakening flower that blooms within the being of quested intent.
    The dawning where theory falls to the ground and is abandoned-like some worn out garment,and the "idea" behind the possibility "lights" up ever so bright within,(a sort of
    coming online?)When one links up to the ALL.

    T00 and T0T are prime examples of this phenomena,they will remain a theory in your
    head,forever if not actioned upon,or will (come online)when the mind realizes the potential
    locked within the (seed) idea.


    tbc



    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  2. #42
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,625
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: T-0-0- T-0-T theory.

    Our mınds are all linked ınto the universal mind.as we "come online" and tap ınto this
    unıversal mıne of knowledge.we see that T00 and T0T are but aspects of our beıngness!




    regards michael
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  3. #43
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,625
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: T-0-0- T-0-T theory.

    Beingness expands in direct ratio to our understanding of what we really
    are,then the "dawning" illumines our minds to the way of TOO and TOT.


    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  4. #44
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,625
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: T-0-0- T-0-T theory.

    T00 and T0T are about realisation and understanding our full potentuality,when we can
    begin to approach this state of awareness,the signal of its authenticity become apparent.





    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  5. #45
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,625
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: T-0-0- T-0-T theory.

    as we awaken into gradual awareness of our true being,the pluralarity of "things" becomes revealed for what it really is "an illusion" we then "see" the connectabilty to
    all existence and the idea of aloness and being apart from leaves us forever.



    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  6. #46
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: T-0-0- T-0-T theory.

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    the pluralarity of "things" becomes revealed for what it really is
    The distinction that separates quantized space-time and continuous space-time analogous to the separation of rational and irrational numbers. But what about the imaginary numbers?
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  7. #47
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,625
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: T-0-0- T-0-T theory.

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    The distinction that separates quantized space-time and continuous space-time analogous to the separation of rational and irrational numbers. But what about the imaginary numbers?

    Well what about those imaginary suckers,lets forget them and see what happens!


    regards michael
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  8. #48
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: T-0-0- T-0-T theory.

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    lets forget them and see what happens
    Try talking them (physicists in particular) out of using complex numbers is futile. They prefer the existence of positive or negative determinants rather than the zero determinant of Hadamard matrices.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  9. #49
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,625
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: T-0-0- T-0-T theory.

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    Try talking them (physicists in particular) out of using complex numbers is futile. They prefer the existence of positive or negative determinants rather than the zero determinant of Hadamard matrices.

    Prehaps we need to bang someheads together,make them see sense!


    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  10. #50
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: T-0-0- T-0-T theory.

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    we need to bang someheads together
    The last of the Mohicans (in this case Richard Feynman) is dead and done. Feynman rule is based on the reality of imaginary mass.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

 

 
Page 5 of 21 FirstFirst 12345678915 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top