[RascalPuff]

As a moderator, imo, neutralino combines temperance, cordiality and guidance.
(Neut: I tried to add a reputation cannister with this message, but instead merely activated a 'quick response')

- RP

[N0B0DY]

If you're interested, RP, the following program is simple to understand and use:

http://sourceforge.net/project/showf...ease_id=563252

[RascalPuff]

Hey Senor Nobody:
A more navigable and streamlined presentation of my work - other than as it appears on delphi - is right here on TOEquest, at:

http://www.toequest.com/forum/toe-th...#content_start

Please have a look at it and tell me what you think.

- RP

[N0B0DY]

I'm looking through right now, RP, and it looks great. Is it all your copyrighted work?

[RascalPuff]

Originally Posted by N0B0DY I'm looking through right now, RP, and it looks great. Is it all your copyrighted work?

There's quotes and illustrations from other sources which I identify when the work isn't mine. There's also some stuff from Wikipedia - the free encyclopedia.

I do think the work could stand some editorial abbreviation.

[N0B0DY]

So you want all of it put into an e-book, RP?

[RascalPuff]

Originally Posted by N0B0DY So you want all of it put into an e-book, RP?

Would prefer to go over the whole thing wearing my editorial hat before you e-book the puppy.

I would also prefer that we get some commentary from this guy named 'Nobody', that hangs around TOEquest a lot, so please consider that a factor...

We'll stay in touch on this, okay? and I'll let you know when I think it's ready, but it's much easier to deal with than the delphi post.

I think it was Robert and/or Michael that divided it into convenient sections.

Glad you like it, whereas, now that I know it's going into an e-book, I wish to scrutinize it more closely. I do want your input so please keep that in mind, in the interim - you've already posted several commentaries on it but most of their locations are unknown to me now.

Thank you for being.

Best regards,
- RP

[austintorn@aol.com]

RP,

I could make an overview, of the dozen points or so from your already condensed 50-page book that I have. I could probably keep it to one page of regular paper. It would be powerful to have all the points together and would also be something that would make people want to read more in depth.

[N0B0DY]

I was thinking more along the lines of a hundred, but my commentaries would change the whole idea from a steady state of both expansion and contraction to a static state of neither, RP.

Out of respect for your work and partly because of the way I feel your work has been unjustly criticized, I would rather just let you weed out what you don't want in and either Austin or I can put it into book form. It is very easy to do.

[RascalPuff]

Originally Posted by austintorn@aol.com RP, I could make an overview, of the dozen points or so from your already condensed 50-page book that I have. I could probably keep it to one page of regular paper. It would be powerful to have all the points together and would also be something that would make people want to read more in depth.

Austin:
Please, by all means do that. It doesn't necessarily have to be all on one page either. Any contribution you make - in pictures or text - will be more than welcome. Can you send me an example - or examples - of what you have in mind? Might you consider making an introductory statement?

I'll be working on editing for a while before I ask you or Nobody to e-book (or pdf?) it - you guys say that's easy but I haven't a clue as to how that's done.

Nobody:
Maybe you would consider an editorial statement of some kind?

What an honor it is to have friends like you.

Please stay in touch.

Best regards to you and yours,
- RP